McCool: (goes through the minutes)
... any objections to publish the minutes?
(none)
approved
(none)
<inserted> wot-security issues
McCool: anything we can close?
... maybe one missing thing on security for discovery
... cross-over issue with discovery
... unsecure directory service would be bad
... (goes through the issues from wot-discovery too)
McCool: creates a new issue on security for directory
wot-discovery issue 96: Should security be mandatory on directories?
McCool: if mandatory, what scheme?
... what security is appropriate for what contexts?
wot-security issue 196: Consider security issues in Discovery
McCool: was there any discussion on lifecycle during the Architecture call last week?
Kaz: no
... we just talked about the FPWD publication, recent use cases,
etc.
McCool: there is still PR ongoing
... we should leave this open until the lifecycle is
finalized
... the PR 539 has been merged, though
McCool: Oliver has agreed to review the
current status and provide input on whether any additional updates
are needed from a security perspective
... (assigns Oliver to Issue 192)
<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/192
McCool: this is an opensource home
automation assistant tool
... would ask Cristiano himself to this issue
... to collect information
... (adds comments on possible questions)
... I'll take Issue 189 on ThingSpeak
McCool: Oliver to review Issue 187
McCool: do we have a right stuff for home
assistants?
... (adds "Hubs" label to issues on home assistants)
<McCool> Issue 187
topic Issue 66 on Role of Platforms in WoT
McCool: are "Hubs" and "Platforms" the
same thing?
... perhaps not
McCool: any opinions?
... next steps here would be (1) to find existing systems that use
object security and consider how to model them (OCF 2.x?)
... (2) to build and experiment with some prototypes in a
Plugfest
... before doing #2 above
... we would have to justify the effort with use cases, etc.
... could be the case if some major ecosystem we want to integrate
with WoT requires object security
... smart city use case may require it
Kaz: yeah
McCool: could start by defining the contexts
[adjourned]