Meeting minutes
approve last meeting minutes
<plh>
AndreaPerego: +1
<riccardoAlbertoni> 0 (i was not there)
<plh> 0
<PWinstanley> +1
<kcoyle> +1
<annette_g> +1
Resolution: last meeting minutes approved
Introduction to new members
PWinstanley: RachelAh, would you introduce yourself?
RachelAh: [introducing herself]
<annette_g> Welcome, RachelAh!
PWinstanley: [Giving a summary of what done by DXWG so far]
Welcome! Good to have you here.
All: [Introducing themselves to RachelAh]
PWinstanley: plh, could you update us a bit on the upcoming TPAC?
plh: So, we'll have a virtual TPAC this year. This is the event when also we try to support WG cross-fertilisation.
… In the devoted day, we ask people to propose topics.
… The registration to WG meetings (as member or observer) will be done as usual.
… We are however more free to select the timeslot, provided that there are no overlaps with other meetings.
<plh> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2020/GroupMeetings#WG.2FIG.2FBG_Group_Meetings_details
PWinstanley: Do we have still time to block our timeslot and breakout sessions?
plh: The sooner the better, but there's still time at the moment, AFAIK.
<plh> The deadline to submit recordings [Lightning talks] is September 21.
<plh> 1400-1500 UTC for breakouts
kcoyle: Which the timezone for the meetings' timeslots?
plh: It's UTC.
<riccardoAlbertoni> +1 to email discussion..
<antoine> rrsagent2, please draft minutes
<annette_g> +1 to email discussion
PWinstanley: We cannot make decisions at this point, but maybe we can do this in the next days, so to get feedback from Simon, Nick, and Rob.
mid-year break report
PWinstanley: I wonder whether we have anything to report about DCAT.
forward plan
<riccardoAlbertoni> I am happy
PWinstanley: Are people happy to have fortnightly meetings for the plenary?
+1
<annette_g> me too
<riccardoAlbertoni> +1
<Ana> +1
<antoine> +1
milestones we should look at
PWinstanley: Conneg is waiting for IETF to proceed further.
… We will wait for having some report from Nick & Rob on this.
PWinstanley: About DCAT, riccardoAlbertoni, when do you think we will have a first draft of DCAT3?
riccardoAlbertoni: We have still some topics to discuss, so difficult to say at the moment.
kcoyle: A question about GH: Should we ask people to use the project feature? It looks like they have been created, but eventually not maintained.
PWinstanley: A question to plh: How the process will be to move to REC track?
plh: The 2020 process has been approved, but we can still keep on using the 2019 process, if need be.
… About the patent policy, nothing will change for the moment.
<plh> https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/dx
<plh>
PWinstanley: So, coming back to your point, kcoyle, do you have any suggestion?
kcoyle: Just suggesting to keep on track with what happened, and having it recorded.
… The main point is to have some "place" where it is possible to see where we are for each deliverable.
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/projects
riccardoAlbertoni: +1 to kcoyle . We are actually using the GH project dashboard. Maybe it is not enough, so we can think of adding some additional info.
<riccardoAlbertoni> sure ..
PWinstanley: As kcoyle said, it may worth looking into how we can have all this in the same place.
PWinstanley: Anything else to discuss about the way we are working? Issues to keep in mind in addition to TPAC?
kcoyle: Based on work we are doing in Dublin Core, it would be great to have some actual metadata record using DCAT2.
PWinstanley: May be worth having a chat with Anna about the Danish profile of DCAT-AP (DCAT-AP-DK).
… Anything else?
All: [silence]
<riccardoAlbertoni> thanks all, have a good night/day!
<RachelAh> thank you all
PWinstanley: Thanks everyone! Nice to have you on board, RachelAh!
[meeting adjourned]