W3C

- DRAFT -

WoT Discovery

07 Sep 2020

Agenda

Attendees

Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Christian_Glomb, Farshid_Tavakolizadeh, Kunihiko_Toumura, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Cristiano_Aguzzi
Regrets
Chair
McCool
Scribe
kaz

Contents


<scribe> scribenick: kaz

Agenda

Farshid: mentions some trouble with ReSpec

Kaz: suggests we don't use fragment URL for workaround

McCool: or local reference?

respec issues

Prev minutes

Aug-31

McCool: (goes through the minutes)
... any comments on the minutes?

(none)

McCool: approved

Aug-17

McCool: bunch of issues
... Farshid, did we create an issue accordingly?

Farshid: guess we did

McCool: ok
... any objections to approve the minutes?

(none)

McCool: approved

TPAC vF2F planning

McCool: f2f is coming up
... PlugFest as well
... also joint sessions
... we should create issues on topics for: DID, Privacy, JSON-LD
... any existing issues to be marked as well?

Farshid: possible meeting with T2TRG on JSONPath?

McCool: good question
... there is an issue on JSONPath

Issue 56 on JSONPath

McCool: (adds a comment to issue 56)

new comment for issue 56

(possible joint meeting with T2TRG)

Issue 54 - Need to define context for added vocabulary

McCool: can close it?

Farshid: not yet done

McCool: ok, still an open issue
... should create an issue in wot-thing-description for this
... combination scheme is still under discussion

<FarshidT> link: https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/617

Issue 24 - Consider how to sign TDs in a directory service

McCool: related to DID

Issue 17- Compare Query and Filter approaches

McCool: maybe can be closed
... (adds a label of "T2TRG")

Issue 2

McCool: (adds a label of "PING")
... another problem with how to deal with JSON-LD fragments in query responses

Farshid: exists for XPath, JSONPath and SPARQL

McCool: (creates a new issue)
... for the joint meeting with JSON-LD

Issue 63

Issue 64 - XPath queries of vocabulary using namespaces

McCool: (and updates the comments on that issue)

new comments

McCool: we need to define DID introduction
... (creates a new issue on that)
... (and adds a label of "DID" to the new issue)

Issue 65

McCool: need to think about which DID methods are applicable

(and then creates another issue of "Consider overlap in DID and Directory functionality)

Issue 66

<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3ADID

<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AJSON-LD

McCool: issues relate to DID and JSON-LD above

Issue 11 - Update Two-Phase proposal

McCool: (adds a comment)

comment added to Issue 11

McCool: (adds some more comments)

new comments

McCool: Privacy issues?

Issues with "PING" label

Issue 67 - new issue on directory API proposal

Schedule for FPWD

McCool: FPWD in September 2020

PR62

PR 62

McCool: any objections to merge this?

(none)

McCool: (merged)

PR61

PR 61

McCool: need to negotiate with the Architecture TF

Farshid: terms to be listed alphabetically

PR51

Farshid: think this is done

8.2.2.3

scribe:

McCool: any concerns to merge PR 51?

(none)

(PR51 merged)

PR60

PR 60

McCool: Toumura-san's PR reviewed by Farshid
... (adds some comments)

McCool's new comment

tou: how to identify the discovery service server?

McCool: just use "_wot" for everything
... and _directory._sub._wot for directory APIs

Farshid: the information is available only during the search

McCool's proposal

McCool: please review the issue

[adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version (CVS log)
$Date: 2020/09/14 14:08:13 $