W3C

– DRAFT –
PWE

11 August 2020

Attendees

Present
Tess (Hober), Jeff, JoryBurson, Judy, Ralph, Tzviya, Wendy Seltzer (wseltzer)
Regrets
AdaRose Cannon, Wendy Reid
Chair
Tzviya
Scribe
Ralph

Meeting minutes

previous 28-July

Training - PWE Roadmap Training section

Tzviya: thanks to Judy for putting together most of the materials in the roadmap

<tzviya> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌PWETF/‌wiki/‌PWE-Roadmap

PWE Roadmap

Judy: Wendy Seltzer and I met a little over a week ago
… she wanted to ask us to be careful about indicating that what's in the Roadmap are a draft
… as we're doing our planning in public space
… this is exploratory

Tzviya: also, on the CEPC Training Plan
… I wanted to talk about approaches to training
… who might provide it
… and share resources

Judy: I talked with one training provider to get an idea of how the industry works and what their offerings are
… I can talk with others as well

Jory: to what extent are we trying to think of the training component as training on our own expectations for our CEPC and culture
… vs a series of trainings that are more widely applicable
… e.g. trainings on using inclusive language
… which flavor do we want to tackle first?

Tzviya: we need to do both
… not just inclusive language
… how to handle CEPC violations as well
… and there's the de-escalation module you've worked on
… there are a bunch of training modules

<Zakim> jeff, you wanted to address Jory's question

Tzviya: one of our discussions should be which modules we want and which come first

Jeff: from my perspective the priority is on training the new CEPC
… ideally that should be done by TPAC
… for context: the AB is having a conversation about whether the AB should be role models in the new CEPC
… the attempt to get the AB to be role models seems difficult; many feel that everybody should equally be role models and that it would be a mistake to call out the AB as role models
… so we have 10k people in the community who would then be expected to be role models
… few of them are even aware of the new CEPC
… we need to have materials out in some fashion before TPAC to start educating the very large community

Judy: this is a nice opportunity to have the new CEPC and organizational interest in training on it
… we have an opportunity to reach potentially very large numbers of folk
… we would benefit from using pilot groups to improve the material to land well for the broader community

<jeff> +1 to Judy

Judy: I've been thinking of concentric circles: staff, leadership {chairs, TF chairs, AB, TAG}, ...
… we might even start by inviting some people from different communities for a first pass
… and include international representation
… maybe layer: groups that we want to actively train in some depth and others we want to inform and orient
… the inform and orient part could be quick
… even get something in place in September

<Zakim> tzviya, you wanted to ask jeff what he thinks the cepc training should include

Judy: I was encouraged to hear from one business how they would go about scaling

Tzviya: I'm all for raising awareness on the CEPC
… if people need more clarity on what the document means, we could have a session on that
… if people just need a walk-through, that would be quick to develop
… we need training on procedures and we do not have procedures in place

<Zakim> joryburson, you wanted to say goal prior to tpac should focus on awareness

Jory: we need some goal posts
… if the goal is simply to ensure that as many of the 10k as possible have been made aware of the new CEPC, have it in front of them, have the opportunity to watch a video describing its purpose
… that's something we can accomplish by end of October
… on the next-level questions that we expect people to ask about procedures we can't do until we have the procedures

Judy: we won't have the procedures in place for a while
… and we don't want to miss the early training opportunity
… see the section on training approaches in the CEPC Training Plan
… can we do more than just send a link and ask people to read?
… offer a walk-through that people could do at their own time and pace?
… a 50-minute chunk with a high-level message and then a walk-through
… even just a narrated explanation tied to the goals of the organization
… with links to additional resources
… a closing statement or a few recap questions; and interestingly, this is somewhat similar to what a professional firm described as their approach
… we could also have live sessions; we have a lot of different options to reach people virtually

<Zakim> jeff, you wanted to respond to what training can include

Jeff: the question on training prior to Procedures raises the question of how revolutionary this CEPC might really be

<tzviya> +1 to judy's proposal

Jeff: the Expected Behaviors includes [new material]
… we really have a revolutionary code
… if we're serious about it we should train on it

WSeltzer: let's start with easy stuff
… send emails with excerpts of highlights from the CEPC
… "your daily burst on Getting to Know the new Code of Conduct"

<joryburson> we could do tweets!

WSeltzer: this doesn't exclude other in-depth training

Jory: +1

Tzviya: Every Tuesday CEPC !

<Zakim> Judy, you wanted to wonder about the importance of reading things in context

Tzviya: I think a one-hour walk-through would be useful
… and give some scenarios
… to hammer the concepts home
… I think we could do that ourselves

<joryburson> happy to help

<Zakim> tzviya, you wanted to talk about next steps

Judy: reflecting on what it would be like to get weekly snippets of CEPC
… one worry I have is that we talked a fair amount about the sequence of material
… particularly in trying to reach audiences who may not have thought about this before, the context of the whole thing is important
… I hope people would first get it in some kind of shared context
… many parts of this may seem radical to us but would not to other organizations who have developed Codes of Conduct

<Zakim> jeff, you wanted to mention the possibility of cascading through chairs

Jeff: there's a lot more here than people were previously trained on
… on smaller test groups, as Judy mentioned, it would be reasonable to reach out to our groups and let them know we're up-leveling our sensitivity
… we can't force them to attend a training session but it would be really nice if the chairs themselves would take it and encourage their groups at their next group call to take it
… this is one approach to get to the larger audience

Tzviya: that gets to the question of who is invited to trainings
… it's not a good idea to invite only chairs

Judy: my eventual goal is to have something that can be re-used often
… and therefore is in a video [recorded] format
… record a live session in case that's what we'd want to re-use
… and ask the pilot test group to stay afterward to give feedback
… something that is scalable without requiring presenters to be available at various times around the globe
… a module on "managing bias" would also be potentially useful to us

Tzviya: CEPC Awareness is something that makes sense for this group to do
… we can work out timing for Americas/Europe and Asia live sessions

Jeff: if we get this done by October 1, we're solidly ahead of TPAC

Tzviya: so we have about a month to prepare
… I'm willing to work on this, with help

Judy: me too

Jory: me too

<jeff> Jeff: me too

<Ralph> happy to help with what I can

Jory: folks here can take turns speaking to specific pieces of the document
… there's more you'd want to do in the form of exercises to make the material stick
… I'm happy to help

Tzviya: who would we invite to the initial session?

Judy: for me, a pilot group is a priority
… it would be extremely helpful to especially look for diversity in this pilot group
… I'd love to get some active TF facilitators, active CG chairs
… I'd hope that some AB and TAG would be willing to participate
… to get diverse feedback

<Zakim> jeff, you wanted to comment on Judy's tiers

Judy: there are a variety of roles in which people act on behalf of W3C

Jeff: I like Judy's tiering of folk
… tier 1: pilot group -- early September makes sense to me
… tier 2: W3C Responsible Folk -- would be great to have them trained by TPAC

<Zakim> joryburson, you wanted to ask what the SWBAT is after this first training

Jeff: tier 3: Everyone Else -- would be great to make them aware with full training later

Judy: +1

Jory: for tier 1, I don't yet have a grasp on what students will be able to do
… that focuses content and learning objectives
… can we discuss that for a few minutes now?

Tzviya: for the awareness session we're just asking them to be familiar with CEPC and if they recognize a situation to pull themselves out
… maybe even as a bystander stop somebody else but maybe that's asking too much

Judy: I don't think that's too much to ask
… 3 goals off the top of my head:
… 1. if some were to happen, what do I do? -- aware of the policy and be able to point someone to an Ombuds
… 2. if they witness something happening, they have some idea that as a bystander there's something they can do
… 3. if someone is in a difficult situation themselves they can look at whether it falls within CEPC

Jeff: +1 to those as second-level goals
… but we need some primary goals as well:
… explain to people what we're trying to achieve as a community
… reminders of the basic values: respect
… in the heat of the moment things happen, be able to address those gracefully and move forward
… there's a higher-level framework of what we're trying to achieve with this new Code even before we get into the things Judy mentioned

Tzviya: I agree the "what to do when you've made a mistake" is an important section but I hesitate to focus on it too much
… my concern is that if we focus on that, people will fixate on that and say "but I apologized"
… things may seem minor that aren't
… people who have been violated might not be able to just move on

Judy: on how to make things stick ...
… we don't know anything about efficacy
… nor does the field as a whole
… I think it's possible that we could do training that would have no effect and we'd not know it
… I'm trying to learn more about what is known and not known about efficacy of training
… what improves the situation in various organizations
… is there interest in outsourcing training to an organization with experience in this?
… we may so need something customized that we can't do that

<Zakim> joryburson, you wanted to say efficacy is hard but one way to measure is how people share after the fact

Tzviya: I doubt that it makes sense to outsource CEPC training to a third party, but we should consider for additional training

Jory: given our timeline it would be harder to get a third party
… one goal is to get people excited after the class to share their experience
… reports that attendees have shared with their colleagues is better evidence that they appreciated the material
… this would be the metric I encourage us to use

Tzviya: I believe that is already happening with our CEPC; I've heard from a few companies that they're using it
… summarizing ...
… we've committed to doing training to a pilot group
… we need to discuss who is in that pilot group
… we need to start scheduling now
… who can work on the scheduling?

<tzviya> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌PWETF/‌wiki/‌CEPC-Training-Plan#possible-tiered-phased-training

Judy: I've updated ^^
… does anything here not reflect our consensus so far?

Judy: the last section of PWE Roadmap is about training
… people are welcome to comment on the expanded workplan
… I prefer that we talk about things here before adding to the public page

Tzviya: let's give some thought for next time about what other sorts of training we want; diversity, ...

Judy: what do we need from W3M?
… we could give them an update

Jeff: certainly updates are in order
… if we want something by early September we need to delegate who is in charge of building this training pilot
… if it's Judy, she needs to know who of us are available to help her
… I recommend another checkpoint on the 25th

Judy: I already have some ideas based on conversations so far
… somebody to do an intro piece; e.g. Jeff -- 3-4 minutes
… maybe Tzviya to do the walk-through for 20 minutes
… and I'd like to brainstorm with Jory about what sort of exercises would work in a canned recording
… close with an offer to do topic-specific trainings; e.g. on de-escalation. I don't yet have an idea on that

Tzviya: that's pretty much what I had pictured
… Judy, Jory, and I will need to schedule time to plan

<joryburson> I have to drop but would also like to talk about doing the de-escalation training at TPAC at the next meeting

<joryburson> https://‌hackmd.io/@ra-6t4fuRmeQNH1J5Rzv3A/‌BysHpmefP

<joryburson> that is a hackmd with the start of the lesson plan

Tzviya: my biggest worry is how to approach an international audience

[adjourned]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 121 (Mon Jun 8 14:50:45 2020 UTC).