<kaz> scribenick: mjk__
Taki: any objections to the minutes?
<kaz> vF2F minutes
McCool: already decided to publish them in the main call
Taki: last week minutes, any comments or objections?
<kaz> July-10
Taki: minutes from July 10th approved
<kaz> Issue 926
<McCool_> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/master/USE-CASES/oauth.md
McCool: reviewed the various flows,
some deprecated terms
... discussion of specific flow types: code, client, implicit,
password
... there is a device flow to be added in addition to code and
device
... not planning to use implicit or password flows
<kaz> PR 927
<kaz> proposed section "5.3.3.8 OAuth2SecurityScheme"
McCool: also edited the table in the
TD editors draft section 5.3.3.8
... added normative assertions to the specification
... users can define additional flows by adding .ttl files,
using password and implicit as examples
<kaz> files changed
McCool: changed the ontology as
well
... updated the official nomenclature for "OAuth 2.0"
... should these changes be a maintenance release or queued up
for 2.0
... should not break any existing TD
... no change to the JSON schema file, should be 1.1
compatible
... we can hold for now and discuss more in the security tf
<kaz> Issue 901
McCool: need to read this issue and think about it more
<inserted> Issue 922
McCool: seems to be a testing
problem, to elaborate and test for all the possible cases
... will assign issue to mm
... write 4 different test scripts
Daniel: will look at node-wot to see what is implemented
<dape> https://github.com/eclipse/thingweb.node-wot/tree/master/packages/binding-http#feature-matrix
<dape> ... apikey for consumer only
McCool: discussion of header vs.
query options
... whether to change the default to header, would be a
breaking change
<inserted> Issue 923
McCool: will need to use a URI
template and define a new scheme for apikey
... where do we indicate the name of the template variable,
could use a fixed naming scheme
... will follow up on the issue
<inserted> Issue 899
McCool: dynamic TDs are troublesome
for directories because of the cache syncing issues
... personally like the action description
Daniel: dynamic TDs may not be the
right pattern for actions, but dynamic TD may have other use
cases for changing resources
... it would be a lower frequency and not as problematic
McCool: there are update cases but only for low rate of updates, not per millisecond
Daniel: agree
McCool: td signing will make it not a
lightweight process
... still favors an action description
... need to use the action description as a template
Koster: still need to do the design
and make some examples
... opc-ua has a long-running call called a program
... distinguished from a short running call, which is called a
method
Daniel: there is an opc-ua binding in node-wot contributed by Cristiano and (Luca Sciullo)
Taki: other topics for today?
Kaz: do we want to wait for 30 minutes for Ege?
McCool: if there are no specific topics, we could adjourn
Taki: will send Ege an
email
... adjourned