<kaz> scribenick: McCool
<scribe> agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#8_July_2020
no guests today
June 10 - review minutes
<kaz> June-10
Ege: would like to add to the agenda about cleanup in the wot repo
Sebastian: summarizes/reviews June 10 minutes
any objections to publishing the June 10 minutes?
(no objections)
Sebastian: will be published
June 17 minutes
<kaz> June-17
Sebastian: reviews/summarizes June 17 minutes
any objections to publishing the June 17 minutes?
(no objections)
Sebastian: will be published
July 1 minutes
<kaz> July 1
summary, cancelled marketing, had marketing discussion during the main call
and also set up the doodle for the new TD call
(any objections?)
(no objections)
Sebastian: will be published
<kaz> vF2F
not going to review or ask for a decision now, but please review
McCool: I suggest that each TF review their own sessions
Sebastian: if there are any comments, let us know, we will finalize next week
McCool: security, discovery, and PoC TF have already reviewed their sessions
doodle poll ongoing, issues with Friday meeting
https://doodle.com/poll/eeydfxm7mq7cpih3
will make final decision in TD call this Friday
but at the moment, the 2h slot on Wednesday looks good
EDT 10am-noon in your timezone
please check the above, and please vote on the doodle poll if you have not already
Ege: note that it was updated since it was first posted
Sebastian: note that if we go with Wed, then we have a 2h slot, so we can combine the TD and binding templates
Lagally: I can only make one of these slots, so we should consider splitting
Sebastian: we do need a 2h slot even just for TD; the bindings are less than 1h usually
McCool: note that the only two
conflict-free slots are the ones on Wed
... and they happen to be adjacent
Ege: I have some conflicts on the Wed but can make it work
McCool: I have conflicts too in the proposed time but can make it work most weeks
Call for AC review (Member-only)
Sebastian: AC reps were supposed to
review, there is a final vote
... deadline is August
Kaz: biggest change is applying
process and patent policy to new evergreen mechanism
... there are many changes... not since May, but from the
previous version
<sebastian> summary of the resolution
Sebastian: new meeting kickoff this
week
... need to decide where to put this new work, eg in a new repo
or in the existing one
... and we need to coordinate with the IETF
... and we need an official OK, seb to contact Carsten
Bormann
... decided to keep the work in the binding templates repo, at
least for now
... also, Klaus Hartke from Ericsson will coordinate and lead
this work
... note that this was a one-time meeting, not a
recurrence
... followup will be in the binding templates call
Kaz: we definitely need to handle this topic carefully via liaison with IETF, I will coordinate with the W3C liaison team
Sebastian: agree; don't expect any problems, but need to do things properly
<kaz> MEIG minutes
Kaz: discussion of proposed
codecs and web transport
... want to integrate all existing codecs
McCool: does it overlap with what Mozilla was interested in or not, i.e. is it just media streams, or also eventing?
Kaz: mostly just media
... may invite them to a future call to discuss. also asking
them for input to the WoT use cases
Sebastian: interested in starting a liaison, but waiting for ITU-T to make a decision
Sebastian: slides are all at https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/PRESENTATIONS
... they are also linked on the agenda page of the wiki
page
Lagally: want to mention I uploaded a summary presentation that we did not have time to go through
McCool: there are a few other presentations in the archive we did not get to... please add links and an explanation to the README
https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2020
this will be a little different since it will be a virtual TPAC
however we have been asked to "self-organize"
the wiki above also collects the joint meetings we want
the main thing we have to do now is pick a time
McCool: note we also need to avoid the MEIG F2F schedule in particular due to kaz's conflict
Lagally: I think we also should look at accessiblity WG joint call
Sebastian: considering dates, there are two possible weeks: Oct 5-9 or Oct 19-23
<kaz> s/accessibility WG/Accessibility Platform Architectures WG/
McCool: I also suggest we wait to
schedule the plugfest only after we see what the rest of the
schedule looks like
... I suggest we do a doodle poll with all ten days, so we can
see all our options
Kaz: I will also talk with the MEIG chairs
Sebastian: not sure we will able to have physical meetings yet, but no rush, will wait
Sebastian: main thing is the explainer
video, we have some inputs on changes to the script we need to
review
... and also some inputs on the web page
Ege: the W3C wot repo has a lot
of github issues...
... would like the rights to add labels and the ability to
close issues
... but there are some useful but old issues, some still
active
... of these should be moved to repos that they relate to, eg.
Scripting
McCool: I have no problem giving those rights
<kaz> kaz: have just added Ege to the wotig-editors group so that he can add labels
Cristiano: scripting ... we took a break, next Monday we will resume
<inserted> scribenick: kaz
McCool: security ... a lot to do
including diagrams on OAuth2 flows
... discovery ... created a PR to outline the index.html
draft
... push on that next week
... PoC ... went through the geolocation updates
... walked through with the input from Govtech
... looked at the geolocation.md use case file as well
... testing cancelled
<inserted> scribenick: McCool
Sebastian: marketing was in main call last week, talked about animation and web pages
Lagally: architecture was cancelled
last week, but would like to share a summary of the
prioritization
... please read when you have more time
<kaz> summary slides
Lagally: will discuss a roadmap tomorrow
<inserted> scribenick: kaz
McCool: regarding the roadmap, we need to regenerate an updated timeline
updated schedule section on the main WoT wiki
Sebastian: yes, we now have to update
the schedule
... TF leaders should discuss it during their TF calls
McCool: note that please don't edit the "current" schedule, but update the "proposed updated schedule" section
Sebastian: TD call cancelled last
week
... the question is that we need to change the slot
... continue the discussion on TDT, etc.
Kaz: regarding the use case assign table Lagally mentioned, I've started to talk with the MEIG chairs for the media-related use cases and the Agriculture CG chair for the agriculture-related use cases
<cris_> https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=arces-wot.td-code
Cristiano: FYI, TD editing tool above
Sebastian: Kaz's talk on the Project Management updates is deferred to the next call
[adjourned]