<scribe> scribe: becky
Janina: noted Matthew's response
to HTML - thanks? Any other news or agenda tweaks?
... heard none
Janina: believe we should extend
the deadline for comments - have gotten only 1 response, it
requested substantive changes; we are out of sync with
co-sponsoring WG - AGWG
... believe we should coordinate timing with AGWG
MC: we should probably call this CFC null and reissue after we have made updates; it would be helpful to address comments now but don't have to be part of current CFC
Janina: we should address
comments already raised - will we need a new URI for a new CFC
or not?
... will communicate with AGWG chairs about coordinating the
CFC efforts
... COGA CFC closes as of midnight - I will write a doc that we
got comments and will reopen
Janina: complaint that all of APA
groups are not keeping our group pages updated with current
status and work
... specifically request for RQTF page to be updated; I will
provide the pointers to current work
... groups are getting good work done
Janina: JF isn't here - Silver TF
has been busy lately; this slides another week - not good
... I will ask JF for status - we need to assign to someone
else if necessary
Janina: have asked our TF for who
they want to meet with, what outcomes are needed - Deadline for
reporting back is next week
... Need that info to put together agenda and to make meeting
requests with other groups; don't know if this will be virtual
or not
... stikes me that FAST might be mature enough to meet with
others? Who would that be?
MC: would be good to run it by groups that are likely to submit tech specs - CSS, etc.
Janina: sounds like requesting 10 min. or so with CSS and other groups that generate a number of specs - show them the tool, ask to use, and provide feedback
Josh: perhaps go back to immersive Web group and ask them to test
Janina: will be talking to Immersive Web about multiple items - XUAR implications, use FAST tool, others?
Josh: do we want to follow on about AOM?
Janina: AOM update is def. important. What about RTC?
Josh: we can tap into groups that have some responsibility into RTC stack - media, second screen ...
Janina: perhaps get several
groups together to discuss issues across groups
... creating that list would be helpful - I heard second
screen, media - any others?
Josh: good place to show XAUR progress
MC: we should do our usual walk-through of groups
Janina: Knowledge domains may be
reemerging but a group under DPUB about making math and
chemistry more accessible; this has moved into a use case in
pronounciation
... for example chemistry: same symbols may have different
meanings depending upon context - certain expressions need to
be pronounced differently
... this may affect pronunciation - we have assumed same
pronunciation throughout a document - do we need to think about
providing additional context?
... TPAC is a good place to explore how to address that
MC: haven't seen any new charters this week
<MichaelC> Challenges with Accessibility Guidelines Conformance and Testing, and Approaches for Mitigating Them
MC: Janina is editor so no need for group to review;
<MichaelC> CSS Ruby Layout Module Level 1
<Joshue108> sorry!
MC: not a FPWD; last update was
2014; think we may have looked at it then
... seems we have not looked at it before
Janina: we need more CSS representative on this call
MC: creates CSS properties that correspond to ruby properties; no need to review
Janina: anything new?
MC: have not made a decision
about media high contrast and element reflection and shadow
root
... waiting on Patrick Lauke for media contrast - will ping
again
<MichaelC> https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5401
Janina: still have to work out process - who can we get to help us that has the needed expertise
MC: has been noted by Alice that
element reflection and shadow root is a critical factor for
accessibility
... believe that Alice is handling so we may not need to be
involved
Janina: we need to understand the trajectory for resolution
MC: suggest we follow this issue but we are not gatekeepers
Janina: agree
MC: have issues in some state of
tacking;
... that is probably all we can do today
Janina: authentication API - is huge, have spent some time with it, not finding any issues - want to close
becky: will go check for any response to the picture in picture issues I submitted
MA: HTML update - I haven't
looked at all changes, yet. 12 issues - have looked at 8; 6
look okay; need some more testing for 2 - working on that
... looked at all the commits between the 2 review drafts there
are only 68 once editorial ones are removed
... probably worth checking those 68 commits - much less than
the 300+ last time
... will email any concerns to the APA list for discussion with
whole group
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/XUAR/XAUR/ Present: Joanmarie_Diggs janina becky Joshue108 Matthew_Atkinson Found Scribe: becky Inferring ScribeNick: becky Found Date: 06 May 2020 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]