W3C

– DRAFT –
DPVCG Bimonthly Call - April 29

29 April 2020

Attendees

Present
beatriz, georg, nishad_thalhath
Regrets
-
Chair
harsh
Scribe
harsh

Meeting minutes

start the meeting

Georg, Beatriz: planning to work on Primer.

harsh: can expand sections with some information about the contents to help contributors

Beatriz: it would be good to have Rights and Principles modeled in the DPV

Georg: regarding rights, it also is relevant and dependant to the supervisory authorities and EPDB. E.g. rights should be specified with all conditions, requirements

harsh: we can take this up on the mailing list in terms of whether to specify a concept or a also to model the requirements

Georg: In terms of time, there should be a way to specify timestamp or duration e.g. for processing

harsh: This is more a policy level annotation? There can be temporal annotations for purpose, legal basis

Georg: then we could have generic property for temporal annotations

Georg: common used standard for this is ISO 8601

Georg: We also do not have a property for processing location

harsh: We can start listing these as use-cases and use them to justify/derive the needed properties

harsh: Do we model processing location as a property for Processing or as Technical measure?

harsh: These to be listed as ACTIONS/ISSUES

rrsagent ACTION: create issues and actions from meeting notes of APR-29 and APR-15

Beatriz: I am also interested in seeing how Signatu uses DPV

harsh: We can do this on a DPVCG call at some point and use this to list how DPV is being used

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 114 (Tue Mar 17 13:45:45 2020 UTC).

Diagnostics

Maybe present: harsh