IRC log of dpvcg on 2020-04-29
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 11:55:21 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #dpvcg
- 11:55:21 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2020/04/29-dpvcg-irc
- 11:56:16 [harsh]
- agenda?
- 11:58:25 [harsh]
- Meeting: DPVCG Bimonthly Call - April 29
- 11:58:31 [harsh]
- Chair: harsh
- 11:58:55 [harsh]
- Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpvcg/2020Apr/0017.html
- 12:05:01 [harsh]
- present+ beatriz
- 12:05:06 [harsh]
- present+ georg
- 12:05:12 [harsh]
- present+ nishad_thalhath
- 12:05:17 [harsh]
- scribe: harsh
- 12:05:40 [harsh]
- start the meeting
- 12:06:14 [harsh]
- Zakim, start the meeting
- 12:06:14 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 12:06:15 [Zakim]
- please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), harsh
- 12:07:45 [harsh]
- meeting: DPVCG Bimonthly Call - April 29
- 12:09:53 [harsh]
- Georg, Beatriz: planning to work on Primer.
- 12:10:13 [harsh]
- harsh: can expand sections with some information about the contents to help contributors
- 12:11:30 [harsh]
- Beatriz: it would be good to have Rights and Principles modeled in the DPV
- 12:12:11 [harsh]
- Georg: regarding rights, it also is relevant and dependant to the supervisory authorities and EPDB. E.g. rights should be specified with all conditions, requirements
- 12:15:53 [harsh]
- harsh: we can take this up on the mailing list in terms of whether to specify a concept or a also to model the requirements
- 12:18:24 [harsh]
- Georg: In terms of time, there should be a way to specify timestamp or duration e.g. for processing
- 12:19:33 [harsh]
- harsh: This is more a policy level annotation? There can be temporal annotations for purpose, legal basis
- 12:20:13 [harsh]
- Georg: then we could have generic property for temporal annotations
- 12:20:26 [harsh]
- Georg: common used standard for this is ISO 8601
- 12:21:05 [harsh]
- Georg: We also do not have a property for processing location
- 12:22:31 [harsh]
- harsh: We can start listing these as use-cases and use them to justify/derive the needed properties
- 12:22:47 [harsh]
- harsh: Do we model processing location as a property for Processing or as Technical measure?
- 12:25:26 [harsh]
- harsh: These to be listed as ACTIONS/ISSUES
- 12:26:06 [harsh]
- rrsagent ACTION: create issues and actions from meeting notes of APR-29 and APR-15
- 12:26:12 [harsh]
- rrsagent, ACTION: create issues and actions from meeting notes of APR-29 and APR-15
- 12:33:14 [harsh]
- Beatriz: I am also interested in seeing how Signatu uses DPV
- 12:34:35 [harsh]
- harsh: We can do this on a DPVCG call at some point and use this to list how DPV is being used
- 12:36:23 [harsh]
- Zakim, end this meeting
- 12:36:23 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been beatriz, georg, nishad_thalhath
- 12:36:25 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 12:36:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/04/29-dpvcg-minutes.html Zakim
- 12:36:29 [Zakim]
- I am happy to have been of service, harsh; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye
- 12:36:33 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #dpvcg
- 12:36:55 [harsh]
- rrsagent, please publish the minutes v2
- 12:36:55 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/04/29-dpvcg-minutes.html harsh
- 12:38:11 [harsh]
- rrsagent, bye
- 12:38:11 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in https://www.w3.org/2020/04/29-dpvcg-actions.rdf :
- 12:38:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: create issues and actions from meeting notes of APR-29 and APR-15 [1]
- 12:38:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in https://www.w3.org/2020/04/29-dpvcg-irc#T12-26-12