W3C

- DRAFT -

WoT Discovery

30 Mar 2020

Agenda

Attendees

Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Kevin_Olotu, Zoltan_Kis, Chritian_Glomb, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Koster, Andrea_Cimmino
Regrets
Chair
McCool
Scribe
zkis

Contents


<kaz> scribenick: zkis

Agenda

<McCool> agenda:https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#30_Mar_2020

MMc editing WG WoT Discovery wiki, guests: Kevin Olotu (Bosch)

McCool: any objection against Kevin as guest?

no objections

McCool: today would like to follow up on the issues

Previous minutes

Mar-23 minutes

McCool: any objections on publishing the Agenda

[no objections]

Pull request #4

https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/4

McCool: I think we should limit the scope to metadata
... otherwise we could merge it

Christian: so the proposal is to split the content to multiple files and link them?

McCool: yes
... and then a README
... we could do that later, for now we can merge it

Christian: I just proposed a template and tried to put the use cases in that
... nothing was changed, just reorganized

McCool: any objections for merging?

[no objections]

Merged with a comment on how to follow up.

Use cases

https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/tree/master/USE-CASES

MMc editing, adding Scope

McCool: limit discovery to metadata discovery

MMc made PR #12

https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/12

McCool: will leave it open for a week for comments

Issue#7

https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/7

Kevin: two kinds of work, alignment of semantic terminology and how to do interoperability

McCool: there is too much things for one issue.
... let's keep this issue for the first, i.e. alignment of semantic terminology and move the rest to a new issue

Andrea: maybe we could explore automatic translation
... into a TD

Koster: take things that are described by Vorto, define those in TD and add protocol bindings

Andrea: but we don't have that translation today, right?

Koster: we could create a TD template and add the protocol binding information
... there are 2 things, the information model and bindings

Andrea: finding the translation is the challenge

McCool: bidirectional translation, even

MMc is creating a new issue for Vorto interoperability

https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/13

McCool: assigning issue#7 to Kevin
... this is more like a TD issue
... didn't work, assigning it to Michael Koster

New issue about whether could a directory service support content negotiation and return metadata in different formats, e.g. Vorto, OpenAPI, WoT TD.

https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/14

Koster: the question is how are we going to use it for discovery searches

McCool: is this suitable scope for you Kevin?

Kevin: yes

Check previous actions again

<kaz> Mar23 minutes

McCool: capturing issues from past minutes
... creating a docker container for node-wot, could we create an issue in node-wot?
... Kaz, please fix the typo for doc->docker

Koster: for management API, we could define a TD

<kaz> [fixed]

<McCool> mm: "doc" should be "docker" in minutes

McCool: CG please create an issue in node-wot

[adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.154 (CVS log)
$Date: 2020/04/01 09:39:40 $