W3C

– DRAFT –
PWE

24 March 2020

Attendees

Present
Angel, Jeff, Jory, Judy, Ralph, Tzviya, WendyReid
Regrets
-
Chair
Tzviya
Scribe
Ralph, WendyReid

Meeting minutes

previous 03-March

Which teleconference service?

Tzviya: we have the opportunity to switch to Zoom

<wendyreid> +1

<jorydotcom> 0

Angel: as long as the network works

<angel> 0

Ralph: do you require dialout to a local Chinese number, AnQi?

Angel: Zoom can provide dialout but other accounts I've tried don't have mainland China dialout numbers

Raph: I don't believe the MIT Zoom license has dialout

Angel: that means the network is the only option

<Ralph> +1 to Zoom

CEPC has been sent to the AC

<tzviya> https://‌lists.w3.org/‌Archives/‌Member/‌w3c-ac-members/‌2020JanMar/‌0034.html

Tzviya: ^^ Coralie's email
… so far we've gotten just two comments in GitHub; one grammatical and the other requesting elaboration on ombudspeople
… the issue is that "ombuds" links only to the glossary
… and concern that if someone really needed to contact an ombuds they needed an easier-to-find link

<tzviya> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌PWETF/‌issues

Tzviya: we got some positive feedback from DanA, TAG chair
… please feel free to comment on the issues

Judy: I think MIT has good coverage on ombuds

Ombudsperson update

Tzviya: in February Judy and I talked with the Director of the International Ombuds Association
… he had some specific guidance, largely focused on organizations rather than individuals
… he provided us a list of resources

Judy: Ralph and I are in contact with two MIT offices
… one fairly new at MIT looking into situations that might require some investigations
… I was about to look into how the MIT Ombuds office might potentially be able to help W3C, perhaps in an advisory role
… we had planned to pick up those meetings [just as MIT sent all employees to work from home]
… I'd love to sync up with Ralph to see what the conditions are for both of those offices

Jory: do we know which of these MIT resources might be available to W3C in a future environment when W3C is separated from MIT?

Jeff: I'm pretty sure MIT would be willing to advise us as we go through a transition
… but I'm quite certain that after the transition MIT would not be willing to provide formal support

Ralph: I'm reminding myself of the new name of this office at MIT, it's related to the title nine office

<Ralph> MIT's new office is called "Institute Discrimination & Harassment Response Office"

<tzviya> https://‌idhr.mit.edu/

Ralph: As Judy said, if we can track down the people in these offices, the ombuds office and the title nine office, which might have become this IDHR office
… we know the role of an ombuds is not to investigate, but to help
… the IDHR office does do investigatory work
… we're in the process of learning what kinds of help they are willing to provide and under what circumstances
… but as Jeff suggested, in my conversations thus far, they've been happy to help informally
… give me ideas on how to proceed when necessary, without formal involvement
… a little bit of training/coaching
… we're in the process of reestablishing communications with them

Tzviya: there's not a quick solution; this will be a long-term project
… first phase will be initial research
… we might need interim solution for ombuds
… longer-term we'll need a new solution for ombuds in the legal entity
… there's a great deal of research and exploration needed
… and create plans for how W3C should move forward

Judy: we may indeed need an interim solution as well as a long-term one
… I was happy to see there are systems set up from a logical perspective
… and maybe those would help us create W3C systems that are informed more by others' best practices

Tzviya: it seems there's a dependency on single points of failure
… there's a lot that depends on so little
… this looks like a better path for us

Training update

Jory: I had the pleasure of doing a "project review" version of the workshop to the W3C staff last Thursday
… thanks to PLH's coordination
… got some really great feedback; the session seemed well-received and the content was helpful
… we want to bolster the content with connections back to W3C
… and to identify what problems this content solves as well as what it doesn't solve
… I will incorporate the feedback into a next version
… PLH is working to get more feedback, especially on the language
… we'll plan another session on the 10th
… and still hope to deliver it at TPAC

Tzviya: I looked through the slides
… it looked great but extremely dense for one hour
… I'm happy to talk with you off-line on ways to divide it up

Jory: that's one of the plans for the 10th
… the material was originally developed for an in-person workshop of 1.5 to 2 hours
… when I learned I had an hour, I decided to see how much I could present
… one idea is to split it out into several pre-recorded segments
… it's tough because we really did want to do this in person

Tzviya: I'm happy to help, but sorry I can't be there on the 10th

Judy: thanks again, Jory; the amount of content you were able to pack in was amazing
… and especially relevant to the kinds of things that arise in W3C space
… I've been thinking about what factors help people remember this kind of content "in the moment'
… I've been surprised with the followup to the [old] MIT [harassment] training
… I've had to remind staff of that material
… if we're able to tie the content enough to W3C context so people remember it when they need it, that would be great
… I've also been thinking about how to make this relevant across language and cultural differences
… some of the vocabulary is not obvious to those for whom English is a second language; they may not evey realize they are missing something

<Ralph> [+1 thanks again to Jory for the premier session]

<jeff> Jory++

<jorydotcom> thank you!!

Tzivya: I heard great feedback as well; thanks again Jory
… I'm really happy to help fine-tune it

Jory: it was recorded, though we wouldn't want to share the recording broadly
… but for folks here who may want to provide feedback we'd be OK sharing it

Tzviya: I'd like to see the recording

Meeting schedule

Tzviya: we're in that period where clocks are changing
… the US has changed
… Europe switches this weekend
… the next meeting is scheduled for April 7
… I won't be able to attend that day
… should we continue bi-weekly or shift back to monthly? should we stick with 1400 UTC ?
… or should we change the time?

Judy: I'd prefer to stay with every-other-week rather than monthly
… it seems likely that things will continue to be disrupted and I'd like some push to track down those MIT offices and report back
… I have some flexibility with the time on Tuesdays
… we should get the WebEx/Zoom question sorted out before the next call

Tzviya: is 1400 UTC ok for everybody?

<angel> ok with 14UTC

<jorydotcom> this works for me

Tzviya: I'll leave the Zoom question to AnQi and Ralph

<angel> quick answer to Ralph, yes, zoom should be fine for me

Tzviya: and specify in the next agenda which conferencing service we'll use

<jorydotcom> * related, I made a bot for Slack to share appreciative notes with your colleagues, my friend and I are looking for folks to test it. If you want to add it to your org or group workspace you can click the add to slack button here: https://‌github.com/‌workingdirectory/‌thanksbot

PWE in Unusual Times

Tzviya: what can we do to help in this very unusual time?

Judy: thanks for the topic
… I've been noticing different practices in several calls
… some calls start the agenda with an around-the-table session
… some people really want to talk about their current challenges
… encouraging a practice of providing some time at the start of calls for 'how are you doing?'
… need to be conscious of how much time it takes
… particularly as people transition to new work modes

Jory: +1 to Judy's suggestions
… at Bocoup we started doing time-boxed 3-minute check-ins at the beginning of our executive meetings
… "functionally, here's how I'm doing today"
… a tiny moment for a wellness check

<wendyreid> +1

Jory: and how emotional state enters into the rest of the meeting
… I definitely recommend this
… another thing we built is a slack app "thanksbot"
… I'd love others testing it
… share moments of appreciation or thanks
… something your colleagues might not have noticed
… thanksbot sends a digest of thanks to the team

Tzviya: all great ideas
… I definitely think a few minutes at the beginning of meetings helps
… we all need to be cognizant that people are under unusual pressures
… W3C is largely a volunteer community
… people won't be meeting deadlines as they had before
… let's all be cognizant that deadlines will need to shift

Jory: should we put out a statement acknowledging that times are tough and there are a lot of things competing for attention?
… "take it easy with each other"

Jeff: W3M has discussed this
… we're currently debating two approaches:
… 1. a generic CEO letter to ac-forum
… some said this would be depersonalized as everyone is getting lots of emails already from many organizations
… 2. have personal contact from someone on the staff they might remember
… more work, perhaps worthwhile under the circumstances
… we were planning to do #2; we got feedback that Asian culture would more appreciate a CEO letter

AnQi: a CEO letter would be really appreciated
… I suggest a third approach:
… I'm seeing some organizations assembling on-line resources to help people
… W3C has been known for remote work for over two decades
… we must have developed some best practices for working remotely that would be appreciated

<tzviya> angel++

AnQi: and also open some tools to help people
… these could be valuable for people who don't have them

Jeff: Ralph and PLH are preparing a document on "continuous operations" for virtual meetings
… planned to distribute to Chairs this week
… maybe it could be distributed more widely

Judy: it might be helpful if we are able to scale to other organizations but we need to be careful about that
… some of what Angel says goes beyond the Continuity of Operations document
… we might invite others in the W3C community to help each other
… or a 24x7 channel for assistance

Tzviya: another area where W3C is really strong is a11y
… the whole world is now on-line
… I saw a tweet from Shadi; the W3C is being recognized now as a resource for a11y
… we can help
… every school is on-line now
… many students are not getting the resources they need

Judy: I've worked a lot with PLH and Ralph to address some a11y issues in the Continuity of Operations document

<Zakim> Judy, you wanted to mention a few things on accessibility of remote

Judy: incorporating experience from our WAI meetings

Continuity of Operations

<Ralph> [^^ not yet formally published, but available for review and comment]

Judy: we're starting in-depth technical conversations in several groups to drive interoperability in tele- and videoconferencing, including pushing out the simple message of existing resources to use
… we do have resources that help several communities

AnQi: can we find channels to amplify those documents?
… last week the UN released a list of remote working tools
… can we use those channels to show our documents and also help make those tools more accessible?

Judy: we're being invited to partner with UNESCO

<Zakim> Judy, you wanted to mention the UNESCO connection as well as others

Judy: there are a number of organizations we're starting to explore to partner with to get a simple message out

AnQi: I may be able to help in China to make those products more accessible

Judy: great; Roy has been helping as well, more help would be really great
… Roy is working on translating our course as well

Tzviya: stay safe, stay healthy

<Ralph> [and stay physically distant, virtually present]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 113 (Sat Mar 7 01:13:06 2020 UTC).