McCool: let's go through the agenda
... unfortunately, have not got response from DID guys
Kaz: shall I respond to your message pinging them?
McCool: yes, please
... 30-min slot is proposed
McCool: (shows the agenda for today's call)
McCool: repo reorg
... PING issue
... f2f face planning
... PRs
... I have no objections
... do we approve the minutes?
(Elena has problem with audio connection, so minutes review will be revisited later)
McCool: we haven't got response yet
(Elena's audio issue is resolved, and we revisit the previous minutes review)
Elena: the minutes are fine
McCool: ok approved
McCool: Oliver has created an updated PR on
end-to-end security
... but he is not available today
... so let's discuss this next week in detail
... we have a newly proposed paragraph here
... but "end" might be a bit misleading
Elena: quite generic
McCool: (adds a comment)
... maybe a bit confusing
... would be better to have a common "examples' subsection
... each example should define what the "ends" are
... we could merge this and then add edits later
... but would be better integration of the existing text and new
contribution
... (add some comments to the original PR 159)
McCool: let's check with Oliver next week
McCool: had some discussion on the
agenda
... would like to have Elena and Lagally at once
Elena: what time/date would fit with him?
McCool: the current Security slot is not
good
... maybe we could start with adding known conflicts to the
agenda
... now we can look at Thursday
... there will be an online discussion for IETF topics but just 3
hours
Elena: you mean next week. right?
McCool: yes
Elena: I can make it on Thursday before 3pm EET
McCool: (adds a line about that to the "Known Conflicts" section)
Elena: Wed after 5pm EET is not good
either
... Tue after 4pm also
... Mon after 4pm as well
... if needed, may try to get adjusted, though
McCool: will ask Lagally about his availability/conflict too
McCool: no response to the PING issue yet
McCool: OAuth2 would be important for
some of the new use cases
... (creates a new issue to re-introduce OAuth2)
Issue 165 on re-introducing OAuth2
McCool: we need to set up an
authentication server for tests
... would be great to have it before the Helsinki f2f meeting
... would like to get an implementer to implement OAuth2 capability
for node-wot
... starting with one producer and one consumer
... need to see what the adequate test would be too
... would like to have another implementation in addition to
node-wot
... need to see how many implementations we need
... (updates comments on Issue 165)
McCool: (also adds another comment)
https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/161
McCool: (adds a comment to Issue 161 as
well)
... ACTION: Create a PR into the TD spec for
discussion. Note however that DIDs are still in flight, so...
McCool: but have conflicts with the TD
call (after US DST change)
... (and then creates a new issue on "Integrity protection to
TDs")
Issue 166 on integrity protection
McCool: (shows the "7.9 Proof" section of the DID draft)
Decentralized Identifiers v1.0
McCool: (adds reference to the "Linked Data Proofs" draft)
Linked Data Proofs 1.0 (CG draft)
McCool: wondering about the relationship between those documents
Kaz: we can ask the DID-WG guys for clarification
[adjourned]