Meeting minutes
I'll help to start
approve minutes of last meeting
<Caroline> +0 was not on the call
+1
<Ana> +0
<annette_g> +1
<PWinstanley> https://www.w3.org/2020/02/25-dxwg-minutes
<PWinstanley> +1
<roba> +0
Resolution: minutes of last meeting approved
splitting the repositories
nick car has done a lot of work on splitting conneg-by-p and prof-vocab into separate repositories
SimonCox: needs people to check that issues have all beeb transferred correctly
https://github.com/w3c/prof-conneg-testing
https://github.com/w3c/dx-connegp
<roba> Needs PRs reviewed on new repos to consolidate removal of unrelated stuff
<annette_g> I can't add much beyond what Simon said.
https://github.com/w3c/dx-prof
<roba> https://github.com/w3c/dx-prof/pull/36
<roba> https://github.com/w3c/dx-connegp/pull/16
PWinstanley: nick has alerted group that issues will be closed in the original repo
need to check here https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+prof
plh: will be checking issues manually over next few months
… challenge is that labels (tags) do not get trasnferred when you transfer an issue
<plh> https://www.w3.org/PM/Groups/issueboard.html?gid=99375
plh: plh will write a script to transfer labels from a snapshot that he took
Caroline: has anyone worked on other DCAT issues?
SimonCox: not in the last week
Extract issues from UCR
SimonCox: again, no progress
<Caroline> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/396
Caroline: close action-396
conneg
<AndreaPerego> close action-396
<trackbot> Closed action-396.
roba can you report on conneg please/
prof
roba anything on prof?
<Caroline> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2020Feb/0077.html
last comments from nick
… re the new repositories
SimonCox: it appears that we are not getting the key people for the agenda topics today
Caroline: do we need to reschedule the meetings to suit key people's timetables?
<roba> sorry - in discussions on other call - will come in on this in a second.
<Caroline> okay roba
<roba> Conneg - fielding questions from potential implementers - need to convene group calls ASAP and start resolving. a few minor issues emerging from implementation experience
prof?
… is it just the repo-splitting that has taken all the energy recently?
<Caroline> Where are these questions?
<roba> PROF - developing profiles for a range of applications - general issue is identification of canonical URIs for baseline specifications being profiled. Will bring discussion to plenary ..
question to roba: Are the conneg issues in GitHub?
<roba> https://github.com/w3c/dx-connegp/issues/15
is there an issue in prof GH as well?
… for specification URIs?
<roba> (and there a few discrepancies in implementation my testing suite development are throwing up)
<roba> no extra issue in prof GH - its not actually an issue with prof - its an implementation challenge.
Caroline: we are talking to roba through IRC
Caroline: roba said that there is conneg issue #15 and a few discrepancies with prof
… so we have to discuss these
PWinstanley: noting that ncar has issues with the connection and will be able to discuss the PRs on repos via email
open actions
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open
<Caroline> Can we close this action? https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/392
#397 on me is still open
<ncar> I think I've caught up on discussion from IRC. Seems there are checks needed for Issue transfer? Is that the only repo splitting PR issue? I don't see any other issues raised in the PRs but all 3 are lacking requisite approvals
we can close #388
<ncar> Yes, I did report for #392 so it can close
<roba> clarification - discrepancies are with conneg implementations - need to clarify intent and raise issues. Prof is still OK but registering profiles in the wild needs careful attention to identifiers.
we can close #390
<AndreaPerego> close action-390
<trackbot> Closed action-390.
<AndreaPerego> close action-392
<trackbot> Closed action-392.
<AndreaPerego> close action-388
<trackbot> Closed action-388.
question to roba : is the problem with identifiers related to tokens only?
<roba> no - it about canonical URIs for documents that do not define them - can we use the URL from specref for example ..
<roba> it needs discussion - probably a DCAT guidance issue too.
<roba> not sure where this dicussion needs to take place though
<Caroline> Roba, can we close this action? https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/393
<Caroline> We will take this previous discussion to the next meeting. Hopefuly Webex will work. plh will kindly try to help with the webex issues :)
<roba> I guess so - it has no other detail.
<AndreaPerego> What about https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/397 ?
<AndreaPerego> close action-393
<trackbot> Closed action-393.
<AndreaPerego> They are not about conneg but the guidance doc
<AndreaPerego> What about https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/397 ?
<AndreaPerego> Got it, thanks.
as no further discussion the meeting was adjourned
<AndreaPerego> Thanks, bye!
bye