W3C

- DRAFT -

Internationalization Working Group Teleconference

30 Jan 2020

Agenda

Attendees

Present
addison, atsushi, richard
Regrets
Fuqiao, JcK
Chair
Addison Phillips
Scribe
addison

Contents


trackbot, prepare teleconference

<agendabot> clear agenda

Agenda and Minutes

Action Items

<najib> ACTION: 853 to No update, still open

<trackbot> Error finding '853'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://www.w3.org/International/track/users>.

https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open

close action-806

<trackbot> Closed action-806.

action-845?

<trackbot> action-845 -- Addison Phillips to Advise intersection observer about our review, pointing out issue 488 -- due 2019-11-14 -- OPEN

<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/845

close action-845

<trackbot> Closed action-845.

Info Share

<scribe> scribenick: addison

RADAR and Active Work Review

richard: have some tests that look to see if you change colors or do other things in spans
... whether that breaks the join in cursive tests
... in the past, chrome did break the join
... but now it doesn't

<r12a> https://w3c.github.io/i18n-tests/results/cursive#title4_id

richard: so good news to share
... someone sent me a set of results in email so that's how I found out
... quite nice, hope others do as well!

https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1

Is HTML good to go?

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Jan/0027.html

<scribe> ACTION: addison: write back about HTML snapshot publication, indicating our on-going work

<trackbot> Created ACTION-854 - Write back about html snapshot publication, indicating our on-going work [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-02-06].

https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3As%3Ahtml

https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/688

addison to forward 688 to whatwg

review GH issue-based gap analysis work

richard: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Jan/0029.html
... seem to be problems with jlreq group in terms of using github
... want to understand what that means in specific
... know that it is a bit daunting, particularly for less technical
... particularly PRs
... it seems to be that we can address in terms of gap analysis docs by handling sections in github issues
... did an exploratory run at this
... see 2nd link in email

<r12a> https://github.com/w3c/sealreq/issues/19

AOB?

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: 853 to No update, still open
[NEW] ACTION: addison: write back about HTML snapshot publication, indicating our on-going work
 

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.154 (CVS log)
$Date: 2020/01/30 15:56:01 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154  of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/sell/share/
Present: addison atsushi richard
Regrets: Fuqiao JcK
Found ScribeNick: addison
Inferring Scribes: addison
Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Jan/0028.html
Found Date: 30 Jan 2020
People with action items: 853 addison

WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]