trackbot, prepare teleconference
<agendabot> clear agenda
https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
<xfq> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2019Dec/0008.html
<scribe> scribenick: addison
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1
review ttml2 2nd edition deferred issues next week
bert: did a review, found some
non-i18n issues
... just the one old issue open
... root margin top right bottom left
... nothing to add. move to awaiting comment resolution
... our 488
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3As%3Awot-thing-description
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2019Dec/0007.html
https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/640
https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/643
RESOLUTION: close all four WOT issues, defer their 643 for next spec version
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2019Dec/0003.html
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/232
clreq is discussing what audio elements should look like in vertical writing mode, since horizontal audio controls take up a lot of horizontal space, and that doesn't look good. Any comment/suggestion on this?
<xfq> https://xfq.github.io/testing/i18n-personal-tests/audio-vertical.html
xfq's demo: https://xfq.github.io/testing/i18n-personal-tests/audio-vertical.html
xfq: the audio element overlaps
with the text or takes a lot of space
... what is the correct layout? rotate 90 degrees? how should
buttons be presented
... after requirements need to think we would like html spec to
mention this normatively
... or leave to browsers
addison: html or writing-modes?
xfq: what about vertical forms?
<r12a> https://www.w3.org/International/articles/vertical-text/index.en#forms
r12a: here's a link
... not widely supported
bert: how common to put inline vs block element
xfq: it's an inline element
... source in a div
... not sure of frequency. doesn't work now so people won't
use
r12a: could ask ttml?
... do they have experts who can comment since they work on
media; if experts exist, what result are we looking
for?
<scribe> ACTION: xfq: write to ttml wg and ask after vertical presentation of audio controls including an appropriate summary
<trackbot> Created ACTION-849 - Write to ttml wg and ask after vertical presentation of audio controls including an appropriate summary [on Fuqiao Xue - due 2019-12-19].
r12a: if goes anywhere, put in
gap analysis for chinese
... could ask mongolian people also btw
... can raise question on mongolian repo
... so maybe xfq send an email to your contacts
xfq: jlreq too?
r12a: seems so
https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4986
next week last meeting of 2019
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/four/four WOT/ Succeeded: s/note widely/not widely/ Default Present: addison, Bert, r12a, Fuqiao, Jck Present: addison Bert r12a Fuqiao Jck Found ScribeNick: addison Inferring Scribes: addison Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2019Dec/0004.html Found Date: 12 Dec 2019 People with action items: write xfq WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]