<LarsG> +1
s/Conform/Confirm
<roba> +1
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:CNEG-Telecon2019.08.22
+1
Resolved: Agenda approved
https://www.w3.org/2019/08/15-dxwgcneg-minutes
<LarsG> +0 (wasn't there...)
+1
<roba> +1
Resolved: Approved minutes from last meeting
<LarsG> (modulo adding me to regrets)
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/products/4
<LarsG> action-193?
<trackbot> action-193: Rob Atkinson to Move jmeter test suite to within w3c systems -- due 2018-09-05 -- OPEN
roba: ACTION-193 has progressed, I have added tests for some things
roba: not ready for final version relase yet so it remains open
<LarsG> action-358?
<trackbot> action-358: Rob Atkinson to to convene working session to co-develop common model to match link header data and alternates view requirements. -- due 2019-08-08 -- OPEN
Discussion on this to take place in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1041
LarsG: there have been a series of commits in the last few weeks on this but I can't see that the Abstract Model, HTTP & QSA are in sync on this
<LarsG> https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/#eg-list-profiles-mediatype
LarsG: Example 10 has an odd way of showing URI/token mapping
ncar: I agree, not conventional, and exmaple's wrong
LarsG: Example 7 is better, using a token part to the profile part of the Link header
ncar: I agree
ncar: I'll propagate Example 7's examples through all other Examples
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22Conneg+3PWD%22
Discussion of Issue 678 and whether it's in/out of scope.
roba: can LarsG see if it's in scope for the IETF draft?
LarsG: yes
Discussion of Issue 1041
This Issue depends on the previous Issue.
Issue 1042 is in progress and comment in Issue now updated
roba: I'm getting closer to implementation and will soon push it to the OGC Naming Authority server
Succeeded: s/Conform/confirm/
Failed: s/Conform/Confirm
Succeeded: s/rob:/roba:/