W3C

– DRAFT –
DXWG CNEG subgroup meeting

11 April 2019

Meeting minutes

<ncar> Hi Lars, can you hear us in WebEx? Rob and I can hear one another

<ncar> * this is a test

<ncar> * Any luck Lars?

<ncar> * How about WebEx

Confirm Agenda

+1

<ncar> +1

Accept previous minutes

https://‌www.w3.org/‌2019/‌03/‌27-dxwgcneg-minutes

+1

<roba> +1

<ncar> +1

Resolved: Accept previous meeting minutes

Open Action Items

https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌track/‌products/‌4

ncar: We can close 320

ACTION-320?

<trackbot> ACTION-320 -- Lars G. Svensson to Propose new meeting times -- due 2019-04-03 -- OPEN

<trackbot> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌track/‌actions/‌320

close action-320

<trackbot> Closed action-320.

Action-316?

<trackbot> Action-316 -- Lars G. Svensson to Review the implications of profile transitivity wrt to ietf document -- due 2019-03-20 -- PENDINGREVIEW

<trackbot> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌track/‌actions/‌316

ncar: seems fine, can be closed

close action-316

<trackbot> Closed action-316.

ncar: we wait for Annette to complete action-322

Existing Pull Requests

https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌pull/‌559

ncar: has been around for quite a while
… just textual changes, just changing URI to URL
… wasn't happy with it at the time
… we can decide to merge it
… will solve the conflicts
… and then the others can review

https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌pull/‌883

roba: needs a small update, will make a few chantes against the branch

ncar: all the commits look fine

roba: will clean up and approve

Review list of github issues and agree which to address for 2PWD

https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aprofile-negotiation

ncar: #882 can probably be closed with the PR
… #884, I'll take that
… #888 acknowledgement section, will try to address that one, too

roba: #575 and #569 (conneg doc edits)

ncar: last comment is old and there is a response, so
… we could flag for closing

roba: we should create subissues for the open things in #575

Action: LarsG_ to contact Antoine to ask if it's OK to close #575 and create subissues for open topics

<trackbot> Error finding 'LarsG_'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌track/‌users>.

Action: LarsG to contact Antoine to ask if it's OK to close #575 and create subissues for open topics

<trackbot> Created ACTION-324 - Contact antoine to ask if it's ok to close #575 and create subissues for open topics [on Lars G. Svensson - due 2019-04-18].

PROPOSED: Mark #569 for closing

<ncar> +1

ncar: everything has been addressed

+1

<roba> +1

Resolved: Mark #569 for closing

ncar: #690 we've discussed that in the issue
… there seems to be no hard way to resolve it

<ncar> * 690

ncar: we've changed examples since this issue, so the comment has been addressed

PROPOSED: Flag #690 for closing

<ncar> +1

<roba> +1

+1

Resolved: Flag #690 for closing

roba: #290 and a bunch of others about requirements

ncar: some are incorrectly tagged
… we should detag #72 (not profile negotiation)
… #217 has nothing to do with profile negotiation

LarsG_: we need to say in a http response that a resource conforms
… to several profiles

ncar: we don't seem to have addressed that

roba: we could close since #287 has been closed

ncar: we still need to address this

roba: we should re-open #287 and close #217 instead
… the tricky part is when the serves wants to say that
… the response conforms to several profiles

<ncar> I have re-opened 217 with a notee about a server describing a response's conformance to multple profiles not in a single hierarchy

ncar: #162 UC: Profile Composition and Languages
… don't think this is profile negotiation
… but rather profile vocabulary
… we should de-tag it
… #261 not due for closing
… LarsG_ has written about media types vs profiles
… but that's not the same
… so we leave open
… there has been no follow-up comment since November

roba: we've dealt with it in #662

ncar: will ask RobS if he thinks that #261 has been addressed by #662
… will email him, too

roba: #265, #266, #274, #284 are all requirements that have been met
… and #286, #289, #290

<roba> propose: de-tag #265, #266, #274, #284 #286, #289, #290 as all requirements are addressed and specific issues now deal with any open discussions on how

<roba> +1

<roba> +1

+1

<ncar> +1

Resolved: de-tag #265, #266, #274, #284 #286, #289, #290 as all requirements are addressed and specific issues now deal with any open discussions on how

roba: we can close my UC #311 and open a new issue that talks
… about order of content negotiation instead (which
… dimension comes first)

ncar: have created #893 tagged as 3PWD

<trackbot> Sorry, LarsG_, I don't understand 'trackbot, please make logs public'. Please refer to <http://‌www.w3.org/‌2005/‌06/‌tracker/‌irc> for help.

ncar: will put in an extra PR about motivation of QSA and fall-back
… options until next week

Summary of action items

  1. LarsG_ to contact Antoine to ask if it's OK to close #575 and create subissues for open topics
  2. LarsG to contact Antoine to ask if it's OK to close #575 and create subissues for open topics

Summary of resolutions

  1. Accept previous meeting minutes
  2. Mark #569 for closing
  3. Flag #690 for closing
  4. de-tag #265, #266, #274, #284 #286, #289, #290 as all requirements are addressed and specific issues now deal with any open discussions on how
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by Bert Bos's scribe.perl version 2.49 (2018/09/19 15:29:32), a reimplementation of David Booth's scribe.perl. See CVS log.

Diagnostics

Succeeded: s/annette/Annette/

Succeeded: s/#619/#610/

Succeeded: s/#610/#697/

Succeeded: s/#697/#690/

Succeeded: s/not/note/

Succeeded: s/with a not/with a note/

Succeeded: s/close/de-tag/

Succeeded: s/tracbot, please make logs public//