<ncar> Hi Lars, can you hear us in WebEx? Rob and I can hear one another
<ncar> * this is a test
<ncar> * Any luck Lars?
<ncar> * How about WebEx
+1
<ncar> +1
https://www.w3.org/2019/03/27-dxwgcneg-minutes
+1
<roba> +1
<ncar> +1
Resolved: Accept previous meeting minutes
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/products/4
ncar: We can close 320
ACTION-320?
<trackbot> ACTION-320 -- Lars G. Svensson to Propose new meeting times -- due 2019-04-03 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/320
close action-320
<trackbot> Closed action-320.
Action-316?
<trackbot> Action-316 -- Lars G. Svensson to Review the implications of profile transitivity wrt to ietf document -- due 2019-03-20 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/316
ncar: seems fine, can be closed
close action-316
<trackbot> Closed action-316.
ncar: we wait for Annette to complete action-322
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/559
ncar: has been around for quite a while
… just textual changes, just changing URI to URL
… wasn't happy with it at the time
… we can decide to merge it
… will solve the conflicts
… and then the others can review
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/883
roba: needs a small update, will make a few chantes against the branch
ncar: all the commits look fine
roba: will clean up and approve
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aprofile-negotiation
ncar: #882 can probably be closed with the PR
… #884, I'll take that
… #888 acknowledgement section, will try to address that one, too
roba: #575 and #569 (conneg doc edits)
ncar: last comment is old and there is a response, so
… we could flag for closing
roba: we should create subissues for the open things in #575
Action: LarsG_ to contact Antoine to ask if it's OK to close #575 and create subissues for open topics
<trackbot> Error finding 'LarsG_'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/users>.
Action: LarsG to contact Antoine to ask if it's OK to close #575 and create subissues for open topics
<trackbot> Created ACTION-324 - Contact antoine to ask if it's ok to close #575 and create subissues for open topics [on Lars G. Svensson - due 2019-04-18].
PROPOSED: Mark #569 for closing
<ncar> +1
ncar: everything has been addressed
+1
<roba> +1
Resolved: Mark #569 for closing
ncar: #690 we've discussed that in the issue
… there seems to be no hard way to resolve it
<ncar> * 690
ncar: we've changed examples since this issue, so the comment has been addressed
PROPOSED: Flag #690 for closing
<ncar> +1
<roba> +1
+1
Resolved: Flag #690 for closing
roba: #290 and a bunch of others about requirements
ncar: some are incorrectly tagged
… we should detag #72 (not profile negotiation)
… #217 has nothing to do with profile negotiation
LarsG_: we need to say in a http response that a resource conforms
… to several profiles
ncar: we don't seem to have addressed that
roba: we could close since #287 has been closed
ncar: we still need to address this
roba: we should re-open #287 and close #217 instead
… the tricky part is when the serves wants to say that
… the response conforms to several profiles
<ncar> I have re-opened 217 with a notee about a server describing a response's conformance to multple profiles not in a single hierarchy
ncar: #162 UC: Profile Composition and Languages
… don't think this is profile negotiation
… but rather profile vocabulary
… we should de-tag it
… #261 not due for closing
… LarsG_ has written about media types vs profiles
… but that's not the same
… so we leave open
… there has been no follow-up comment since November
roba: we've dealt with it in #662
ncar: will ask RobS if he thinks that #261 has been addressed by #662
… will email him, too
roba: #265, #266, #274, #284 are all requirements that have been met
… and #286, #289, #290
<roba> propose: de-tag #265, #266, #274, #284 #286, #289, #290 as all requirements are addressed and specific issues now deal with any open discussions on how
<roba> +1
<roba> +1
+1
<ncar> +1
Resolved: de-tag #265, #266, #274, #284 #286, #289, #290 as all requirements are addressed and specific issues now deal with any open discussions on how
roba: we can close my UC #311 and open a new issue that talks
… about order of content negotiation instead (which
… dimension comes first)
ncar: have created #893 tagged as 3PWD
<trackbot> Sorry, LarsG_, I don't understand 'trackbot, please make logs public'. Please refer to <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc> for help.
ncar: will put in an extra PR about motivation of QSA and fall-back
… options until next week
Succeeded: s/annette/Annette/
Succeeded: s/#619/#610/
Succeeded: s/#610/#697/
Succeeded: s/#697/#690/
Succeeded: s/not/note/
Succeeded: s/with a not/with a note/
Succeeded: s/close/de-tag/
Succeeded: s/tracbot, please make logs public//