scribe; Chris
<scribe> scribe: Chris
Janina: How do we make it easy for others to particiapte
Matthew for accessibility in gaming and Chris with ACM accessibility practices
Janina: Any edits? None
... Items of interest? None
Janina: TPAC - meeting on Monday
/ Tuesday
... No specifics. Wiki page to gather reqs.
... Determining scope for Pronunciation TF is possibility
... Any Questions / comments re TPAC? None
Janina: Ian is covering
transforsm topic from last week. Janina updated Pronunciation
TF
... Pronunciation TF very actively engaged. Many new faces to
W3C.
Irfan: most members new, and unfamiliar with standard operating procedure at W3C. Training ongoing
Janina: Questions?
... Personalization is working well. Demos may be available for
TPAC. Possible collab with Web Apps group
... COGA focused on WCAG. Want use cases from them.
... Research actively enaged on many issues including CAPTCHAs.
Upcoming wide review of draft.
... Many differences between logging in and proving you're not
a bot. Very different use cases.
... Industry seems to have changed opinions re: privacy.
Facebook looking for guidance and regulations
... TF updates complete
Janina: review old action
item
... Issues still exist with content editable.
<janina> https://www.w3.org/2017/11/07-editing-minutes.html#item09
<janina> https://www.w4.org/2017/11/29-apa-minutes#item03
Janina: Sina Berham intersted in topic. Can bring forward his requirements
<joanie> https://www.w3.org/2017/11/29-apa-minutes#item03
Joanie: Waiting on Sina to
finailize IE application.
... Continue discussions
thx Joanie
Janina: Comments, Questions? None
<joanie> s/thx joanie//
Janina: New publications?
... Work with CSS and Pronunciation. Gap analysis.
Michael: Profiles Vocabulary.
Working draft. Does not require review.
... Trace Context Protocols Registry. Review not
required.
... User Timing Level 3. Are we ready to review?
<MichaelC> Mitigating Browser Fingerprinting in Web Specifications
Janina: not at this time
Michael: Accessibility use cases, recommend review
<Joshue108> That looks interesting to me..
Janina: Propose APA memebers
review doc
... schedule follow up conversation in two weeks. Action item
for Janina.
<MichaelC> ACTION: janina to bring back Mitigating Browser Fingerprinting in Web Specifications for group discussion - due 2 weeks
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2189 - Bring back mitigating browser fingerprinting in web specifications for group discussion [on Janina Sajka - due 2019-04-17].
<MichaelC> action-2189: https://www.w3.org/TR/fingerprinting-guidance/
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2189 Bring back mitigating browser fingerprinting in web specifications for group discussion.
<MichaelC> action-2189?
<trackbot> action-2189 -- Janina Sajka to Bring back mitigating browser fingerprinting in web specifications for group discussion -- due 2019-04-17 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2189
<MichaelC> action-2189: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Mitigating_Browser_Fingerprinting_in_Web_Specifications
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2189 Bring back mitigating browser fingerprinting in web specifications for group discussion.
Janina: Progress on action items?
<Joshue108> Sounds good
<Joshue108> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Verticals_to_Track
Janina: Do verticals exist to
develop further accessibility use cases? Good opportunity for
Josh?
... Conversations with automotive working group from previous
TPAC re: accessibility use cases
... limited scope
... XR opportunities for accessibility use cases
... Content magnification as an example - potentially
problematic
Michael: we should identify criteria important for APA with respect to Josh's involvement
Josh: A lot of work to do.
Requires further prioritization across verticals
... Many goals may be aspirational. Need to determine pragmatic
approach to prioritizing issues
Janina: Thoughts?
Janina: Do we use Tracker for managing tasks across verticals?
Michael: Use verticals page and
Tracker in unison
... Better option may be available down the road, but this is
the option currently.
Matthew: agree with approach.
Chris Will reach out to ACM and then include Publishing WG
no further business
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/coveing/covering/ Succeeded: s/mmbers/members/ Succeeded: s/Sena/Sina/g FAILED: s/thx joanie// Default Present: irfan, janina, Matthew_Atkinson, Becka11y, Joanmarie_Diggs, Gottfried, JF, JonnyJames, MichaelC, Chris Present: irfan janina Matthew_Atkinson Becka11y Joanmarie_Diggs Gottfried JF JonnyJames MichaelC Chris Regrets: Gottfried Ian Becky John Found Scribe: Chris Inferring ScribeNick: Chris Found Date: 03 Apr 2019 People with action items: janina WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]