<roba> me too..
<roba> * my test audio worked
<roba> +1
+1
<roba> proposed: confirm minutes https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgcneg-minutes
+1
<roba> +1
Resolved: accept minutes https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgcneg-minutes
action-235?
<trackbot> action-235 -- Rob Atkinson to Create sequence diagram from abstract model and definitions -- due 2018-10-17 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/235
roba: came up with a crude diagram (PPT style)
… is that useful?
… and should I create a PR?
LarsG: perhaps better to create an issue and discuss the diagram there
Action: roba to create an issue for sequence diagram
<trackbot> Created ACTION-312 - Create an issue for sequence diagram [on Rob Atkinson - due 2019-03-20].
close action-235
<trackbot> Closed action-235.
action-291?
<trackbot> action-291 -- Nicholas Car to Review initial "no overlap" determination and propose explanatory note -- due 2019-02-20 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/291
LarsG: nick isn't here, so let's ping nick about that.
Action: LarsG to ping Nick about action-291
<trackbot> Created ACTION-313 - Ping nick about action-291 [on Lars G. Svensson - due 2019-03-20].
action-299?
<trackbot> action-299 -- Lars G. Svensson to Remove discussion of http options from doc as per #510 -- due 2019-02-27 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/299
LarsG: has been done and merged
close action-299
<trackbot> Closed action-299.
action-300?
<trackbot> action-300 -- Lars G. Svensson to Update #195 to respond as initiator and prepare for closing -- due 2019-02-27 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/300
LarsG: addressed in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/195#issuecomment-468197758
roba: "schema" is a role in the profiles ontology
… it's not related to conneg anymore, so we can untag the github issue
<roba> proposed: remove profile-negotiation tag from issue #195
+1
<roba> +1
Resolved: remove profile-negotiation tag from issue #195
<roba> actioned.
close action-300
<trackbot> Closed action-300.
action-301
<trackbot> action-301 -- Lars G. Svensson to Review doc and reference treatment and propose to close #45 -- due 2019-02-27 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/301
roba: issue 45 has been merged and closed
close action-301
<trackbot> Closed action-301.
action-302?
<trackbot> action-302 -- Lars G. Svensson to Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate. -- due 2019-02-27 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/302
LarsG: Has addressed chairs, resolution was that issues concerning use cases can be untagged
… if they are closed for a specific deliverable
… but they should not be closed if there are other deliverables depending
… on it.
… cf. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Feb/0617.html
close action-302
<trackbot> Closed action-302.
Action: LarsG to talk to systems team since emails from the list
… are not recorded in the action
<trackbot> Created ACTION-314 - Talk to systems team since emails from the list [on Lars G. Svensson - due 2019-03-20].
action-303?
<trackbot> action-303 -- Lars G. Svensson to Write up text proposal for #678 and ask kam to review -- due 2019-03-07 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/303
roba: action has been done
… proposal written and Kam has responded)
close action-303
<trackbot> Closed action-303.
action-304?
<trackbot> action-304 -- Lars G. Svensson to Write up some text for #662 -- due 2019-03-07 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/304
roba: has been addressed in issue #45, so we can close 304 and #662
close action-304
<trackbot> Closed action-304.
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/632
LarsG: has been resolved, can be closed
roba: if it has been tagged as due-for-closing and we have no comments
… for two weeks it should be safe to close an issue
+1
roba: so we can close #632
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/592
LarsG: peter hasn't answered the question at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/592#issuecomment-465742985 yet
roba: not much about URLs in the document (or URIs)
<roba> actually we use URI or token consistently.
roba: why don't we add a statement about URL length in the document
Action: LarsG to add a proposal for URL length into #592
<trackbot> Created ACTION-315 - Add a proposal for url length into #592 [on Lars G. Svensson - due 2019-03-20].
roba: and we remove the due-for-closing tag
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/422
roba: this has been addressed, so we can close
+1
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/287
roba: this has been addressed
LarsG: has been "due-for-closing" for four months...
… so we can safely close it
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/285
LarsG: this is only tagged profile-negotiation so we should be able to close it
<roba> +1
LarsG: just closed it
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/239
roba: this has been dealt with in profile negotiation so we can untag it
+1
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/205
roba: this has been dealt with in profile negotiation so we can untag it
+1
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/73
roba: this is a duplicate of #287
… so since we've untagged #287 we should be able to close #73
actioned
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/72
roba: we have a profile definition that is good enough for conneg
… and we can revisit that if necessary
… until then we rely on what the other groups come up with
… conneg requires a strict definition
LarsG: all conneg needs is a profile URI to negotiate on
<roba> note conneg requires current strict definition of profiles - they only add constraints - conneg requires substitutably.
<roba> "The server should attempt to reply with a profile that best matches the client request. The order of preference a server MUST follow to determine a best matching profile is: an exact match, followed by a profile (perhaps transitively) of the requested profile."
roba: we might want to strengthen the wording here
Action: LarsG to review the implications of profile transitivity wrt to IETF document
<trackbot> Created ACTION-316 - Review the implications of profile transitivity wrt to ietf document [on Lars G. Svensson - due 2019-03-20].
Action: roba to remove the "list tokens" part from the ED since that's not necessary any more
<trackbot> Created ACTION-317 - Remove the "list tokens" part from the ed since that's not necessary any more [on Rob Atkinson - due 2019-03-20].
roba: "cruft" is about the requirements at the bottom of the document
… referring to issues that are not open any longer
… we should check that all relevant open issues are in the document
… and should remove the rest of them
Action: LarsG to remove closed issues from the connec ED document
<trackbot> Created ACTION-318 - Remove closed issues from the connec ed document [on Lars G. Svensson - due 2019-03-20].
Succeeded: s/issues/issues concerning use cases/
Succeeded: s/(po//