W3C

- DRAFT -

WoT-IG/WG

06 Feb 2019

Attendees

Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Daniel_Peintner, Ege_Korkan, Kunihiko_Toumura, Matthias_Kovatsch, Michael_Lagally, Ryuichi_Matsukura, Taki_Kamiya, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Toru_Kawaguchi, Yosuke_Nakamura, Zoltan_Kis, Sebastian_Kaebisch
Regrets
Chair
McCool, Matthias
Scribe
kawaguch

Contents


<kaz> scribenick: kawaguch

<McCool> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#6_Feb_2019 Agenda for today

Quick updates

none

F2F debrief

Draft F2F minutes

McCool: Action items
... not sure all captured
... IG charter
... At risk items at TD spec
... should be also revisit
... aim to review the minutes next week
... Github site for presentation from Princeton meeting
... people please put pdf as well as original ppt, etc.
... will check this next week
... once the presentation is there then hyperlink will be put from the minute

Lagally: already made PR

McCool: TestFest result rollover
... plan to move new directory
... after 32hours now will copy things to new directory
... after TD call on Friday things are shift to new directory
... at risk items fixers are identified
... some featured are to be removed
... draft ready for sharing withTAG by first of March
... CR condition 2 weeks after that
... by the end of this month major change should have been fixed
... most of these at risk items should be fixed by then
... I'll present tooling to automatically highlight this table by Friday

<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/blob/master/testing/inputs/atrisk.csv

Kaz: do we need more assigned guys for at risk features?

McCool: some of items are blank but covered by sub assertions
... some like 'unit' needs volunteer

Ege: could you put text such as `need volunteer`?

McCool: yes

Kaz: my expectation is all ACTION is listed already

Ege: made issues but not sure how it relates to ACTION
... issue 392 was raised but fixed

<ege> Action item 1 is already done at #392

<ege> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/392

McCool: Marketing
... had some ACTIONS regarding to marketing

Sebastian: how to handle security looks to be not my task

Matthias: this is just to create an issue about architecture

<McCool_> action item 12: should be "One Data Model" group

McCool: Action Item 12 should read One Data Model, rather than Open..

Sebastian: are presentation at F2F ready?

McCool: should be copied to this directory

<McCool_> https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/f2f/2019/01-princeton

IETF

Matthias: preparing for IETF 104 in March
... pre-meeting will be at Friday week before
... WISHI hackathon will be on Sat/Sun, who would join from this group?
... Sebastian will also join

McCool: One data model group will also be demonstrated
... One action item is to gather more information about One Data Model

Lagally: Need communication about scope and goals
... to understand how the group is working

McCool: Still trying to fix charters through e-mails
... no homepage yet.
... I think they are still informative stage

Kaz: my understanding is that after people reached out and gather information then talk to W3M

McCool: question is whether we'd like to be a founding member or not
... let's wait update from Michael Koster next week

Architecture

Lagally: Architecture update
... had a call today
... we worked through current architecture editors draft
... found a couple of loophole, editorials and made issued
... looked over the pictures one for Things and one for Servients
... Matsukura-san offered to lead updating diagrams.
... there are 14 old issues and everybody will look into open issue whether they are valid or not
... please review all the open issues on the architecture repo
... we also decided to merge current restructure to master branch
... after then please make all PR to master branch
... we identified some sections still missing so please volunteer

Workshop

Sebastian: Workshop
... responses from Mathias and Mitsubishi
... one hour before this meeting we had a workshop call
... Jeff hopefully bring this draft workshop CfP page to W3M meeting so will be approved
... all the logistics as well as openday details will be udpated

McCool: update until timing by CfP should be important

Kaz: note that the latest draft page is currently members only since some of the information is to be confirmed

<kaz> workshop cfp (member-only)

Charter extension and rechartering

Kaz: IG extension
... got approval for 6-month extension
... need to talk with communication team to announce

McCool: recharter
... we discussed simple API as IG charter
... we should put right things to right place

Scripting

<zolkis> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1HN15VhjCcZEjrSllFSUVxUWiYhxFdslx80EtyJObNeo/edit#slide=id.g4f3568cca6_0_0

Zoltan: updated presentation
... asked node js expert as well as browser people for review
... got 3 feedbacks so far
... new API and old API are written side by side.
... we will discuss details next week
... let's get through next week
... we don't have testing call this week

Kaz: use another minutes for Scripting API

Zoltan: slide 16
... main difference is new API uses constructer
... discovery became an object
... this API is much self describing
... new API has thing.metaData.name while old one has thing.name
... JavaScript people prefer
... slide 17
... new api with constructor while old one factory
... new api has property.onchange
... while old api has thing.subscribe with observer
... new API has DOM event
... possibly may cause confusion
... what doing here is similar
... this case it's very clear it's event
... slide 18
... constructor is ExposedThing at new API
... new API uses temperaturePropertyModel directly
... some typos still there
... will ask for more feedback
... we can still make this W3C note

Sebastian: at that level we should not take forms

Zoltan: yes we shouldn't have foms

McCool: Security?

Zoltan: no difference

McCool: plan is to talk about this at scripting call

Lagally: in Architecture document there is scripting API building block

Zoltan: it depends how we treat scripting API
... current state is for browser use polyfill

Lagally: we should take same level of abstraction as TD

AOB

<Zakim> kaz, you wanted to mention the draft f2f minutes are updated and now the action list include links to the context (mention this after scripting discussion)

Kaz: updated F2F meeting minutes so please review
... let's finalize the F2F minutes by next week

McCool: no security meeting this and next week

<kaz> [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.154 (CVS log)
$Date: 2019/02/07 13:00:37 $