– DRAFT –
DXWG plenary
08 January 2019
<kcoyle> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/Profimes-Ont-&-Conneg-RFQ-emails
<ncar> Sorry can't scribe today
<dsr> Couple of minutes to approve …
<PWinstanley> minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/12/18-dxwg-minutes
<PWinstanley> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Dec/0179.html
kcoyle: no decisions from the last meeting, too few members
<alejandra> for 20181218 minutes, I was absent (I was late and when I joined the meeting had finished, so sent late apologies)
Resolved: accept minutes of Decmber 12
PWinstanley: do we need 5th f2f, and where? when?
… march or june, alongside meetings
… any others?
… any comments?
ncar: I will be in Slovenia, but unlikely in Germany
PWinstanley: yes, that's why that is a good proposal
alejandra: not sure I have funding to attend either
<AndreaPerego> I'm also unsure whether I'll be able to attend either.
<annette_g> I have zero funding for travel lately :(
PWinstanley: not thinking of location, but what about 5th f2f in general? do we need it?
<AndreaPerego> I think it's needed.
ncar: would be useful to have before end for an overview of all; how they relate to each other
PWinstanley: both coordination and the idea of creating primers
ncar: yes, this could be outlined quickly in a group
<PWinstanley> kcoyle: given how little we have done on the guidance doc, we should be thinking about a f2f related to that ... earlier than june
kcoyle: f2f relating to guidance document, which is not very far along
… that would be best earlier than June
antoine: would be great if very cheap or free
<alejandra> are you proposing to organise it locally? ;-)
<AndreaPerego> Makes sense to me.
PWinstanley: other option is to do a virtual f2f - have long virtual connectedness
<ncar> I could do virtual F2F, any time day or night
PWinstanley: gets around the money and travel question
antoine: perhaps we could try a few half day meetings?
AndreaPerego: would also be in favor of virtual f2f; but need to have a very clear agenda, a list of issues for decisions
… remote is different from an actual f2f
<PWinstanley> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open
<antoine> mine continues
<AndreaPerego> #242 is yet to be done.
ncar: what is 244?
antoine: aligning different diagrams around the f2f in Genoa, and we discussed again in Lyon
… trying to interpret what is going on with the profile discussion and to reconcile
… still to be done
… and will want ncar input, especially based on the paper being prepared
ncar: there are some issues that have appeared, but there are also changes that are coming from the paper and those will be integrated in the next week
<AndreaPerego> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/265
AndreaPerego: relates to a github issue 265; rewording of requirement relating to association of data and metadata; don't exactly remember which output this relates to
ncar: may not be needed for profile negotiation document; probably more on profile guidance
<AndreaPerego> Just associated action-242 with profile-guidance.
PWinstanley: action 265 is on everyone to review the UCR
antoine: may be worth doing another review of UCR because we didn't get much feed back
… maybe Nick can resend
PWinstanley: decided at dec 18 plenary to organize comments starting January
… what opportunities will people have to discuss this at meetings?
ncar: Australian Gov't working group chairs meeting will discuss this because plan to use these
… OGC Geosemantics domain wg coming up
… also Aust/NZ profiles md working group
… have sent out about 15 notifications to Australian sources
PWinstanley: videos and blog posts helpful
… need to give people a deadline
… what are some realistic dates? give folks a 3-4 week deadline
… try to get responses to public working list
<alejandra> http://software.ac.uk/
alejandra: I'm writing a blog post because funding for f2f in Lyon is based on that; will send a draft and then it will be published at software.ac.uk web site
<Zakim> AndreaPerego, you wanted to mention mail from ODRL CG on DXWG Profiles
<AndreaPerego> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-odrl/2019Jan/0000.html
AndreaPerego: has been posted to ODRL working group mailing list
… can they be reviewers?
ncar: was picked up from W3C notification on home page; we should probably contact other W3C groups
antoine: names Michael Steidl to be contacted re:ODRL and ProfOnt
antoine: Jaro has been checking and fixing links; need to check the Europeana links; after that should be close to ready
<PWinstanley> kcoyle: I updated the doc incorporating the requirements to style like the UCR, but no writing done yet
antoine: this is a major improvement; for fpwd we can fill in some text in sections but not all of them
alejandra: the editor's draft has some changes; we decided not to release in December but may do on in January
… everyone should look at editor's draft and make comments
… additions related to licenses and rights; quality information; description of qualified relationships
<alejandra> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/14
alejandra: milestone - focus for immediate work, could be 3rd WD; many are editorial but others are in a closing state
<alejandra> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/15
alejandra: other milestone aligns other issues; there are issues that may not be addressed by end of WG
… asking group for priorities
PWinstanley: how do they feel about increasing rate of publication?
alejandra: everyone agrees; however, needs to go through this group for approval; therefore need the time for the plenary to review
<Zakim> AndreaPerego, you wanted to propose we do the same as DCAT for PROF
AndreaPerego: can we adopt same schedule for prof ontology? there are some things that have come to light while working on paper
… can we focus on these for a new release?
<alejandra> +1 to creating a milestone for PROF
AndreaPerego: question of whether we need prof:BaseSpecification?
antoine: +1, I also have some notes that include AndreaPerego's issues, will put them in github in the next few days
ncar: looks fine, it's a matter of doing it; chunks of the paper that could be included in PWD
… some things are changes/issues and we can tag them for the next WD
… there are uncontroversial ones
<AndreaPerego> Thanks, ncar
PWinstanley: Anything else for today?
ncar: Clear who to send profile ontology WD to; less clear for conneg; need help to get that out
PWinstanley: yes, agree. Blog posts, etc. reach a larger audience
Succeeded: s/others/Michael Steidl
Succeeded: s/mileston/milestone
Succeeded: s/basePRofile/prof:BaseSpecification/