<Judy> https://www.w3.org/2018/05/w3c-highlights/ Any additional accessibility angles?
<jamesn> regrets from me for 18
<scribe> scribe: MichaelC
next meeting: 18 July 2018
<Judy> https://www.w3.org/2018/05/w3c-highlights/
jb: ^ FYI
let me know if questions, comments, agenda topics from that
intersections with your groups
APA especially
Jeff will talk about verticals at some point
and a11y intersections
jb: there can be need-based fee waivers for Invited Experts to register for TPAC
there´s also a diversity support fund
https://www.w3.org/blog/2018/06/diversity-at-w3c-launch-of-tpac-diversity-scholarship/
tz: IEs shouldn´t have to ask for fee waiver, it should be by default
jb: that´s news...
tz: form has been changed today
jb: do they have to ask still?
tz: no
jb: BTW, is it announced here that Tzviya is on AB?
<janina> Congrats to Tzviya!
tz: will become official in July
jb: note when you talk about TPAC in your groups, you should cover these things, not all people will have seen
jb: WCAG 2.1 Rec last week
something else out this week, but no announcements, looking for those
mc: still haven´t sent
js: updated WD of CAPTCHA this month
mc: Graphics-ARIA, Graphics-AAM pending Director approval
FPWD of ARIA 1.2, Core-AAM 1.2, and ARIA APG 1.2
jb: think Ralph and PLH have questions on graphics stuff
<inserted> mc: COGA Gap Analysis last week
<Judy> ...so might be useful to reach out to them prior to their usual Friday sit-down for director's approval
jb: @@ WCAG 2.1 @@ WCAG 2.0
might want to add stuff to FAQ
how easy to add to FAQ?
<janina> need to step away briefly, brb ...
mc: mostly SLH; easiness depends on which publication system it´s in
jb: meant wrt WCAG approval
mc: not approval, but FYI and comment window helpful
<Judy> ACTION: JB talk with Shawn about adding a WCAG 2.1/VPAT 2.1 difference clarification to the W3C WCAG FAQ
<trackbot> Created ACTION-8 - Talk with shawn about adding a wcag 2.1/vpat 2.1 difference clarification to the w3c wcag faq [on Judy Brewer - due 2018-06-27].
jb: if you hear of difficulties or good experiences people having with WCAG, would be helpful to hear
jb: covered above
some press coverage
jb: expect APA and ARIA charter refresh to go to AC today
please help ensure AC reps take a look
https://www.w3.org/2018/03/draft-apa-charter
https://www.w3.org/2018/03/draft-aria-charter
jb: want to explore more usage of roadmaps across a11y work
starting with what we have, how maintained, how useful
MC, ARIA?
https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/roadmap
jn: useful internally
it´s our plan for next X years
linked from charter, rather than bound into charter
bit more flexibility
shift stuff among releases as needed
jb: this evolved?
jn: yes, the content did; we wrote it down at the FtF in May
<janina> I'm back--sorry for the interrupt
jb: architectural overview?
so it´s for group planning
is it helpful for communicating to other parts of W3C?
jn: I can´t say, they can tell us if it´s useful
mc: have answered questions by saying ¨look at the roadmap¨
jb: and that´s useful?
mc: don´t follow up, haven´t heard not
<Judy> https://github.com/w3c/web-roadmaps
jn: if people have different priorities, then can approach the group
e.g., Math recently came to our attention, but at the moment not in the ARIA plan
jb: have been considering a math a11y workshop
discussion in various places
but keeps grinding to a halt
didn´t know ARIA also involved
can you toss to strategy?
jn: mostly Joanie
anything that comes into ARIA will bubble up
at the moment, the work isn´t ready for ARIA work
if something emerges, we could add it
once readiness / maturity known
jb: Joanie has commented into strategy funnel
I´m trying to keep thread from dying
Way above, see link to roadmapping tool
is ARIA one standalone or can link to other things?
jn: don´t see use in adding to a pool of other things we have to maintain
it´s informal and maintainable as needed by us
jb: but discoverable from list of roadmaps?
jn: don´t know who would search through roadmaps for what
sure we can come along but don´t want to be first on something like this
jb: there´s an emerging collection
others?
tz: we did one for publishing but never looked at it
useful to see contingencies
but unless everyone doing, just another thing
jb: so critical mass needed?
tz: yes
<tzviya> https://w3c.github.io/web-roadmaps/publishing/
though a bit old
jb: ARIA one up to date?
<Judy> https://www.w3.org/Mobile/roadmap/
jn: ´cause we did as part of recent charter
jb: also see mobile roadmap
got lots of interesting stuff
with drill-downs into strategy, documents, status
mc: huge -1 to being stuck with maintaining something like this
sure it´s useful to people looking for info, but really hard to stay on top of content unless fully automated
jb: think intent is to automate once wired in
js: if content falls out of date, usefulness is compromised, so need to know these things are up to date
jb: so you like this one
js: yes
jb: Kathy, what about you?
kw: sure, looks nice
can be useful to think through those categories
as planning next round of work
jb: enough diversity of documents to make relevant?
kw: yes, though ours would be smaller
kw: Interactive Accessibility has merged with The Paciello Group
so I´ll become a TPG rep
jb: your role?
kw: I´ll lead strategy and services for TPG and IA
tz: BISG planning a11y day in Jan
might invite some WAI people
jb: great advance planning
may be relevant to several WAI people
I expect to be in NY more also
jb: let me know of topics you want to cover
will bring in Jeff in an upcoming meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: i/zakim, next item/mc: COGA Gap Analysis last week Succeeded: s/difficulties/difficulties or good experiences/ Succeeded: s|https://www.w3.org/2018/03/draft-apa-charter|| Present: Kathy janina tzviya MichaelC Judy jamesn Found Scribe: MichaelC Inferring ScribeNick: MichaelC WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 20 Jun 2018 People with action items: jb WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]