– DRAFT –
dcat team 2018-03-28

<SimonCox> rrsagent make logs public

<SimonCox> thanks NicholasCar

confirm agenda

<SimonCox> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.03.28

approve minutes of last meeting

<SimonCox> https://‌lists.w3.org/‌Archives/‌Public/‌public-dxwg-wg/‌2018Mar/‌0342.html

agenda confirmed

<arminhaller> +1

<SimonCox> +1

+1

<Stijn_Goedertier_AIV> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> 0 (absent last time)

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<PWinstanley> 0 not there

DCAT rec FPWD

Resolved: agenda confirmed

<SimonCox> https://‌w3c.github.io/‌dxwg/‌dcat/

SimonCox: FPWD due asap

SimonCox: FPWD is DCAT 1.0 plus a lot of places for potential change marked

<SimonCox> Proposed: the DCAT Team recommend that the DXWG release the Editors Draft of the revised DCAT Recommendation as FPWD

AndreaPerego raised the issue of a missing changelog

SimonCox thinks one could be added

<SimonCox> Friendly amendment from AndreaPerego

<SimonCox> Proposed: the DCAT Team recommend that the DXWG release the Editors Draft of the revised DCAT Recommendation as FPWD, with changelog added as an Annex

<AndreaPerego> +1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

Action: AndreaPerego to complete DCAT changelog

<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.

+1

<SimonCox> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.

<Stijn_Goedertier_AIV> +1

<AndreaPerego> +1

<PWinstanley> +1

<arminhaller> +1

DCAT Topics

Resolved: the DCAT Team recommend that the DXWG release the Editors Draft of the revised DCAT Recommendation as FPWD, with changelog added as an Annex

<SimonCox> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌milestones

(thanks Andres, trying to work out commands)

<SimonCox> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌DCAT-Vocabulary-topics

<SimonCox> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Application-profiles

<SimonCox> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Data-service

<SimonCox> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Data-aspects---semantics

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> How would thos wiki pages turn / relate to specification?

DCAT Modules

<arminhaller> also pull request can then be delayed to be accepted until after the vote

<Zakim> Stijn_Goedertier_AIV, you wanted to comment on process (https://‌www.w3.org/‌2018/‌Process-20180201/#first-wd)

DCAT Modules

scope of DCAT

<SimonCox> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌172

<PWinstanley_> +1 to Nic's comment - increasingly the public sector space will have digital service endpoints

NicholasCar suggested that a better DCAT service handling will allow joining DCAT information to other ontology's information that deal with services and systems

<Zakim> AndreaPerego, you wanted to note that is probably more about the scope of dcat:Catalog, and only in a second stage about DCAT as a whole

AndreaPerego draws the distinction between things in a Catalog (perhaps we should allow not just Dataset) and Services better described as a Distribution to access Datasets

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1 to address the issues separately ;)

+1 to progress in the steps SimonCox outlined

AndreaPerego highlighted the difficulty of coordinating all the issues

<SimonCox> Proposed: DCAT Catalogs may include data distribution services

<Stijn_Goedertier_AIV> +1

<SimonCox> +1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

<arminhaller> +1

<PWinstanley_> +1

+1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<SimonCox> AndreaPerego: +1 verbally

Resolved: DCAT Catalogs may include data distribution services

service classification

SimonCox describes previous instances of vocabularies for service classification

<SimonCox> https://‌inspire.ec.europa.eu/‌metadata-codelist/‌SpatialDataServiceType

<Stijn_Goedertier_AIV> This is an example of an INSPIRE download service metadata record: http://‌catalog.inspire.geoportail.lu/‌geonetwork/‌srv/‌eng/‌catalog.search#/‌metadata/‌34646802-4538-4fbf-8c21-bff4aae0fc38

<AndreaPerego> Geocat list of URIs for protocols: https://‌github.com/‌GeoCat/‌Cat-Interop/‌blob/‌master/‌LinkPropertyLookupTable.csv

<SimonCox> Proposed: DCAT Catalogs may include other services, which may be classified by type

<AndreaPerego> INSPIRE service type classification (based on ISO 19115:2003): http://‌inspire.ec.europa.eu/‌metadata-codelist/‌SpatialDataServiceType

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> definitely, +1

<SimonCox> +1

+1

<DaveBrowning> +1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<AndreaPerego> +1

<Stijn_Goedertier_AIV> +1

<arminhaller> +1

Resolved: DCAT Catalogs may include other services, which may be classified by type

<PWinstanley_> +1

<SimonCox> Proposed: DCAT Catalogs may include data catalogs

<PWinstanley_> +1

<SimonCox> +1

<Stijn_Goedertier_AIV> +1

+1 - this is very useful for manageable Linked Data

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> is the term "include" broad enough? ... "related"?

<DaveBrowning> +1

<PWinstanley_> (I think this was included in the EC DCAT-AP1.1 update

<AndreaPerego> +1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

Resolved: DCAT Catalogs may include data catalogs

<SimonCox> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Cataloguing-data-services

SimonCox has described the suggestions made in https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Cataloguing-data-services

Jaroslav_Pullmann raised the nature of one catalogue "including" another

SimonCox discussed use of dctype:Service v. delcaring a new DCAT class of Service

<SimonCox> Proposed: Description of data services in DCAT Catalogs shall use a class defined for DCAT

+1

<AndreaPerego> Need to think a bit more about this...

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1, really supporting the separation of "distribution" and "delivery"

<AndreaPerego> Sorry.

<SimonCox> +1

<PWinstanley_> +1

...as long as wel make the mapping to dctype:Service explict I can't see the harm

<DaveBrowning> +1, (if I understand correctly)

<arminhaller> +1

<Stijn_Goedertier_AIV> +1

Resolved: Description of data services in DCAT Catalogs shall use a class defined for DCAT

<AndreaPerego> 0

<Stijn_Goedertier_AIV> thanks all

<riccardoAlbertoni> bye all..

<PWinstanley_> bye