<scribe> scribe: gottfried
Ian: Have to leave in 25 mins
Gottfried: Sabbatical from Mar-Aug 2018 in Atlanta
Ian: Proposed email on the CSS a11y test force.
<IanPouncey> "The CSS Accessibility Task Force is a group endeavour between the CSS Working Group, ARIA Working Group, and the Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Working Group to review and advise on the accessibility concerns and requirements for CSS specifications.
<IanPouncey> We currently have a large backlog of specifications that require review, so we are looking for people to join the task force. If you are interested in participating in the CSS A11Y TF, please send an e-mail to mailto:w3c@ipouncey.co.uk and include a little bit about what you’re interested in and how you think that you may be able to contribute to the Task Force."
John: Where are you sending this email to? E.g. public lists?
Ian: Webaim is a good idea.
Janina: Need to be clear that W3C is hosting. WAI-IG.
John: General call should go wide
- more likely to get responses.
... Twitter - people can retweet
Ian: Yes. I'll send the email to W3C. And make it clear that this belongs to W3C, and send out to external mailing lists as well.
Michael: Can somebody pass me a proposed tweet, with hashtags?
Ian: I will do.
John: Do we allow non-W3C members to participate?
Michael: People can always submit
pull requests. That's the main mechanism right now.
... CSS task force should allow for non-W3C members. Need to
look.
Ian: Non-members can comment.
Janina: Don't like to think about changing to community group.
Ian: Last call for global correspondence for animations in CSS. Nobody objected. I will send the email.
Janina: we are not on a protected
branch - need owner
... We have some docs that we are actively working on now.
Michael: Protected means that in
the APA repo changes need to be approved before
publication.
... Multiple members can make parallel edits, and then send
pull requests.
... We use this model in WCAG.
... Give me your Github user name and i will set you up.
Becky: We can still create a fork into our local repo, right?
Michael: Better do not fork
because if they fall out of date, it is hard to sync up.
... Other people cannot see what you are doing.
... Only external people have to use forks.
Becky: So better to branch.
Janina: MAUR will come up, and other docs - talking shortly.
Janina: Next week joint meeting
with TTML.
... Agenda next week.
... Goal: Find an accommodation that we all can live with.
John: It is possible that i won't be able to join the meeting.
Janina: Let me know as early as possible if you will be able to attend.
John: I will try hard.
... The main issue: Caption text can be formatted by the
user.
... This may block parts of the video. This may become an
"inaccessible user experience" as somebody has put it.
... We have examples of making captions really big.
... I'd like to see some language that reassures content
creators that users don't get frustrated when bumping up the
captions if they need it.
Janina: Why say anything if the spec does not prohibit this?
John: Some of the caption people
cannot imaging the advanced a11y use cases.
... Guidance in the docs should be just educational.
q ack
Gottfried: I won't be able to
attend next week.
... There was some language in TTML that assumed that the
caption creator "sets the format in stone". We need to adjust
this language.
Janina: Reschedule the call?
John: I will try everything to be able to attend.
Janina: They need to understand that the user needs to be able to change font according to their needs.
John: Agree.
<JF> "Author proposes, User disposes"
Michael: Shall i close the WebVTT actions?
<Becka11y> have to step out for a minute - brb
John: I still have some dangling
responses - keep those assigned to me
... Meeting with WebVTT people scheduled for next week.
action-2162?
<trackbot> action-2162 -- John Foliot to Prepare response to webvtt request for feedback on 2015 comments -- due 2018-01-10 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2162
action-2167?
<trackbot> action-2167 -- John Foliot to Follow up with webvtt comments due fewb 6 -- due 2018-02-07 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2167
action-2158?
<trackbot> action-2158 -- Ian Pouncey to Manage review of css animations https://www.w3.org/tr/css-animations-1/ in context of previous pf activity from 5 years ago -- due 2018-02-07 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2158
`action-2159?
action-2159?
<trackbot> action-2159 -- Ian Pouncey to Manage review of css transforms https://www.w3.org/tr/css-transforms-1/ note pf feedback from 2009 -- due 2018-02-07 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2159
action-2163?
<trackbot> action-2163 -- Ian Pouncey to Manage review of css basic user interface module level 4 -- due 2018-01-10 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2163
action-2153?
<trackbot> action-2153 -- John Foliot to Review and draft a warning note for orienation api spec, for apa review -- due 2018-02-07 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2153
John: Please extend
Michael: It is probably for
screen orientation api
... Let's leave it open for now.
<MichaelC> action-2153: assuming https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/The_Screen_Orientation_API
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2153 Review and draft a warning note for orienation api spec, for apa review.
action-2123?
<trackbot> action-2123 -- Ted Drake to Triage changelog of dom 4.1 https://www.w3.org/tr/dom41/#historical-changes-fpwd-dom4 - note stuff on mutation -- due 2018-01-24 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2123
Becky: I am supposed to look at shadow DOM
action-2052?
<trackbot> action-2052 -- Becky Gibson to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/shadow-dom/ shadow dom -- due 2018-02-07 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2052
Janina: Shane looked at DOM in the past. With shadow DOM we need to be more careful since it is more AT oriented
Michael: Leave it open for now?
Janina: yes
action-2038?
<trackbot> action-2038 -- Michael Cooper to Raise [https://www.w3.org/tr/credential-management-1/ credential management level 1] for re-review -- due 2018-02-18 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2038
Michael: Has been republished
once.
... There is content in it now
... Fred took a look, made some notes.
... Pass on to coga. Moved to me when Fred left.
... We probably should review it now.
... Fred thought that somebody from payments tf should be
involved.
Janina: Sounds like me.
<MichaelC> ACTION: janina to review Credential Management Level 1
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2168 - Review credential management level 1 [on Janina Sajka - due 2018-02-28].
<MichaelC> action-2168: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Credential_Management_Level_1
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2168 Review credential management level 1.
<MichaelC> action-2168: https://www.w3.org/TR/credential-management-1/
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2168 Review credential management level 1.
<MichaelC> close action-2038
<trackbot> Closed action-2038.
Michael: Old stuff following.
Janina: First clean up new charter.
ack
Michael: There are 3 web assembly
specs
... Like assembly language for the web.
... Algorithmic specs - i cannot read them.
... We don't need to review, i think
John: It is backend stuff.
Michael: I did a quick scan. No feature that would make it impossible to do alt text.
Janina: If they were ui-related, they would need to be more specific about platform.
Michael: If you were using this
tech, you would have to do all a11y support from scratch.
... But it should be possible.
... Maybe we need to request an a11y statement.
Janina: Maybe i should send them a note, asking for clarification of use cases.
Michael: Maybe we should have a review of web assembly core then.
https://www.w3.org/TR/wasm-core-1/
Janina: Give me an action for Mar
14
... Suggest them to use our self-assessment tool.
... Maybe we need an accessibility impact statement
<MichaelC> ACTION: Janina to ask Web Assembly WG about Web Assembly core, what are use cases, does it impact UI and need a11y advice about using a11y API
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2169 - Ask web assembly wg about web assembly core, what are use cases, does it impact ui and need a11y advice about using a11y api [on Janina Sajka - due 2018-02-28].
<MichaelC> action-2169: https://www.w3.org/TR/wasm-core-1/
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2169 Ask web assembly wg about web assembly core, what are use cases, does it impact ui and need a11y advice about using a11y api.
<MichaelC> action-2169: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/WebAssembly_Core_Specification
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2169 Ask web assembly wg about web assembly core, what are use cases, does it impact ui and need a11y advice about using a11y api.
Michael: The other new TRs:
<MichaelC> Custom Elements
Janina: We should wait until Leonie is here.
Michael: It says: Warning - no longer being updated as a stand-alone specification (as of Aug 2016)
Janina: Seems they have been
sloppy in their status.
... Charles said something about custom elements being folded
into main HTML.
... We don't care about the status note.
Michael: We have a note -
probably scary for a11y. Janina was asked to follow up.
... The action is old.
<MichaelC> action-2075 due 1 week
<trackbot> Set action-2075 Check with léonie and steve on custom elements https://www.w3.org/tr/custom-elements/ due date to 2018-02-28.
<MichaelC> action-2075: also relationship to web components?
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2075 Check with léonie and steve on custom elements https://www.w3.org/tr/custom-elements/.
Michael: Custom elements vs. web components
John: Charles wrote a note about custom elements moving into the main html spec.
Janina: We may need to ask
Charles to join.
... But he is in a bad time zone.
Michael: We don't have web components in our wiki.
Janina: This came up in the WAI-CC call driven by Judy.
<MichaelC> Framework for Accessibility in the Specification of Technologies (FAST)
<MichaelC> FAST checklist
Janina: Survey should have a
higher priority than writing a doc.
... APA should look into this. Moving to a 1.0
publication.
... How do people feel about that?
Michael: I propose to publish Web
Technology Accessibility Guidelines into TR.
... Section 3 on meeting user needs.
... I filled out section 4 on making best use of time.
... The second doc is the checklist. http://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist
... Contains references to relevant specs.
... In theory, people could use this in reviewing conformance
to the guidelines.
... I don't think this should become a TR.
John: Why not checklist as TR?
Michael: Hard to update and
format in a useful way.
... Same as quickref for WCAG 2.0
John: Your table 4.3 Meeting user needs. Hard to read.
Gottfried: ISO/IEC DIS 29138-1 User Needs Summary, probably going to be published this year.
Michael: There are references, but this is missing. I'll be happy to add it.
Gottfried: ISO standard has useful taxonomy. Origin is Gregg's work on user needs in the 90s.
Michael: I was going to develop a taxonomy, but will look at the ISO standard.
Janina: Looks like we agree on
the procedure.
... Discuss further steps next week on WAI-CC?
Michael: Yes, discuss in WAI-CC.
Janina: Okay, then bring it back here.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/to/on/ Succeeded: s/2/3/ Default Present: janina, JF, MichaelC, Joanmarie_Diggs, IanPouncey, gottfried, Becka11y Present: janina JF MichaelC Joanmarie_Diggs IanPouncey gottfried Becka11y Found Scribe: gottfried Inferring ScribeNick: gottfried Found Date: 21 Feb 2018 People with action items: janina WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]