<DaveBrowning_> scribe nick: DaveBrowning_
<alejandra> Today's meeting page: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.01.24
alejandra: Proposed agenda at the link, but if we need to change it we can
<alejandra> /www.w3.org/2018/01/17-dxwgdcat-minutes.htm///www.w3.org/2018/01/17-dxwgdcat-minutes.htm
<alejandra> Approval of last week's minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/01/17-dxwgdcat-minutes.html
<AndreaPerego> +1
<alejandra> +1
+1
<arminhaller> +1
<riccardoAlbertoni> +1
resolved
Resolved: Approval of last weeks minutes
<alejandra> Github issue tracker: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues
alejandra: Has been discussion of routing GitHub issues to email list
… notifications are already available by watching the repository
DaveBrowning_: I've been seeing the notifications coming through
alejandra: Simon has sent a pull request, and some updates that we can use as an example
PWinstanley: Should be able to demo via webex.... (discussion of detail)
alejandra: <Talks through the GitHub interface, the issues created for each requirements, the existing tags (subject to review)>
… modifications starts by creating branch, and update as needed
… use of skos:editorialnote for audit purpose
s/skis/skos/
<AndreaPerego> +1 to using pull requests
<arminhaller> +1 to pull requests
<riccardoAlbertoni> +1 to use the pull request and to give some degree of freedom to the editors in case of trivial decision ;)
<alejandra> DaveBrowning_: I think that the general approach works
<alejandra> ... we can work with a degree of freedom
<alejandra> ... we need to be careful on how to move forward
<alejandra> ... more complicated situation when something touches multiple requirements
PWinstanley: Concern that the project is very spread out , and we need to bring things together (condense/consolidate)
… rather than letting get too fine grained
arminhaller: wiki pages have worked well, especially if there was an need for diagrams - used to drive agreement in the weekly meeting
alejandra: Idea/intention was to try to stay within GitHub/small number of channels rather than spread it wider
arminhaller: W3C has previously implied that it desired to have stuff safe stored outside github
alejandra: The idea to forward actions through mailing list will create a copy
<Zakim> DaveBrowning_, you wanted to ask about GitHub permissions
alejandra: Everyone can add issues, fork the repository (make copy into own area)
… can request merges, but can't do them - they need to be contributors
… probably need to ask Dave Raggett to add
<arminhaller> +1 to PR #94
alejandra: Important to be able to group the requirements so we can handle them in the appropriate collections
… need to revise/review the tags that exist, We need to classify the requirements for our purposes
+1 to assigning
AndreaPerego: If we want separate people to look at the groups we need to make sure the clustering is right
<riccardoAlbertoni> +1 to AndreaPerego 's comments
alejandra: There already is some form of clustering in the 'section heads' of the requirements list - and start from there
AndreaPerego: There may be some requirements that need more general changes to DCAT that need more co-ordination across the people working
alejandra: If we do some analysis and come back together next week to discussion if this is working, and any changes we can make (if we haven't discussed via GitHub)
<AndreaPerego> +1
+1
<arminhaller> +1
<riccardoAlbertoni> +1
<PWinstanley> +1
<riccardoAlbertoni> I candidate myself for quality
Resolved: Split up requirements across attendees today and review/revise tagging
<arminhaller> i can do semantics
DaveBrowning_: I can do distributions and relationships
ale
alejandra: I can do identification
<PWinstanley> please assign versioning
PWinstanley: Happy to do anything left
alejandra: aim is to revise tags, revise comments
<alejandra> identification requirements that I will check: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Arequirement+label%3Adcat+label%3Aidentification+
<riccardoAlbertoni> Thanks for chairing and for the discussion...
<riccardoAlbertoni> bye!
<AndreaPerego> Bye!
<PWinstanley> thanks. bye!!
<alejandra> thanks, and bye!
bye
Succeeded: s/Approval of last week's minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/01/17-dxwgdcat-minutes.htm//
Succeeded: s/resolved: last week's minutes approved//
Succeeded: s/skis/skos
Failed: s/skis/skos/
Succeeded: s/graine/grained/
Succeeded: s/clusting/clustering/
Succeeded: s/my self/myself