<benws_> Many thanks
<renato> Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20180115
<renato> Chair: Ben
https://www.w3.org/2017/12/11-poe-minutes
<renato> +1
<benws_> +1
+1
<ivan> +1
<LindaB> +1
RESOLUTION: the minutes of the last meeting are agreed
ivan: sent an email today listing the members of this working group who are also full W3C member and have not voted yet
<renato> Deadline is 4 Feb
benws_: how many votes are needed?
ivan: no real numerical minimal requirement.
... ODRL got already 5 affirmative votes. 5 more would be great.
benws_: What if members vote against?
ivan: The Director will decide what happens next: back the WG - or not.
http://w3c.github.io/poe/semantics/
victor: he could work on that - if it is not required that he works on Best Practices
ivan: recollects: this document may be dropped caused by copyright issues
renato: the original goal for this vote was
to catch the formal semantics
... but not they have been moved to the Information Model document ...
... therefore: they are not not-existing.
<benws_> https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Best_Practices
victor: when should the document be finalized?
ivan: the period of this WG has been
extended longer than extended. But we should stick to our
... initial plans: finalized such documents by mid-Februars. 1st week of
February is the dead line for editors
victor: ok, will align
benws_: would like to add more commentary,
and more examples (or links to)
... and be behind common licenses expressed by ODRL
<victor> you may want to see those licenses here: http://rdflicense.appspot.com/
victor: is aware of such common licenses expressed by ODRL 2.1 = the old version
<victor> example: http://rdflicense.appspot.com/rdflicense/cc-by2.5hu.ttl
benws_: is it possible to update it?
michaelS: IPTC started to work on RightsML aligned with ODRL 2.2 - including some examples
benws_: showed interest to include such examples in the Best Practices
michaelS: will provide one or two by the end of January
LindaB: suggests to talk to Caroline/Copyright Hub
<renato> https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/201
<benws_> https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Best+Practices%22
benws_: did policy inference go into the Validation document?
victor: sees no open issues in this area.
ivan: suggested to close this issue
benws_: asked if such issues can be handed over to the ODRL Community Group
ivan: yes
... maybe the ownership of the Wiki can be handed over as a whole
victor: asked benws_ to discuss with him details of the Best Practices document
benws_: agreed, maybe starting next week
renato: we had 3 issues submitted for the
Use Cases
... we can decide it we want to address them.
benws_: will go through those and provide feedback.
renato: we don't have real issues there
ivan: we should discuss "life after the
recommendation"
... who will run activities after its release. Who will handle errata?
... we need a group of people maintaining ODRL in future.
benws_: TR will use ODRL widely, more
information architects will work on ODRL and they could support such a
community group
... the Community Group should spread the word: into IoT and others
michaelS: reminded: the CG should maintain a list of all know ODRL Profiles
ivan: who will run the CG?
renato: is currently its chair and will continue
ivan: suggested to send an email to the CG introducing such plans for maintenance there.
renato: we should create a list of action for the CG
LindaB: what about face-to-face or online meetings?
ivan: f2f has no budget, but Webexes could be hosted by W3C
<renato> Current ODRL CG members https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/participants
<renato> Next call 29th Jan