<renato> https://www.w3.org/2017/11/13-poe-minutes
renato: silence means approval
... and they're approved
<renato> https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/actions/49
action-49
<trackbot> action-49 -- Benedict Whittam Smith to Add commentary to the test regime page as instructions for implementors -- due 2017-10-02 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/actions/49
benws_: I hope I managed to send a request
with changes to you
... on github
<lindab> not able to join via regular teleconference . Can you send me dial in #
renato: can't see anything
<renato> https://w3c.github.io/poe/test/test-regime
benws_: will send it to you directly via email
renato: we are getting to the pointy end of the CR process
<renato> https://w3c.github.io/poe/test/implementors
renato: looking at the google doc &
final implementors page, they are the same?
... we got 2 implementations from UPM and IPTC
... how did TR go the last couple of weeks?
benws_: probably end of next week for results (8th dec.)
renato: probably the only other impl. we are waiting for?
ivan: the last 4 lines weren't implemented by anyone
michaelS: how to implement them?
renato: we are only looking at the CR-IM ones
ivan: that means, with a bit of luck
... we can vote for going to PR at around 11th
... at the same time we would ask for an extension of the charter
... we cannot publish this year
... if we get the extension that's fine (assuming the PR request goes
in)
<renato> https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/VocabTest
[renato explaining entries for 17/18]
renato: the idea would be to do the same for json-ld context files (19)
ivan: essentially you've done 19/20 michaelS
... I would have expect victor and ben to have done the same (you are
using/have used the context file)
... I dont know why we have 20
... but yeah
michaelS: 20 should have been phrased differently
http://www.easyrdf.org/converter
http://rdf-translator.appspot.com/?_sm_au_=iVVNVR363T7PQlj7
<ivan> http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller?command=serialize
renato: that's the vocab test cases done
... any other questions regarding test cases?
michaelS: could we rephrase the wording of 20?
<renato> https://github.com/w3c/poe/projects/2
ivan: no.. don't do it
renato: mostly editorial
... an issue was raised regarding the version numbering
... we've added 2.2 to the title of both documents
ivan: this information should be prominently featured!
lindab: I think 3.0 would make most people happier (than 2.2)
renato: the namespace has 2 in it
... if we are doing a 3, we would need a more substantial change
benws_: well.. there's changed a lot
ivan: the ns is already part of the spec
itself and all implementations would have to be rerun again.. (I think)
... the question is whether it's worth it
renato: nah..
ivan: what will happen with the various notes?
[simon giving an update on FS note]
ivan: be aware of copyright issues!
... we could ask for a charter extension until end of febr or even march
(but that's maybe a bit of a stretch)
renato: we'll have our next call in 2 weeks
<ivan> trackbot, end telcon