See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: janina
jgw: Comments on their survey
instrument were requested by today.
... Far too short a timeline ...
ds: Intention is to have a very
small set of questions that will be asked to every stakeholder
group
... Can request time if needed
jgw: Thanks to David for
compiling comments into a doc.
... This is our last chance for comments and meeting their
requested deadline.
... Assuming there will be more rounds, especially targeted at
specific stakeholder communities.
ds: Specific Question: Would RQTF
like to be in the loop for the various communities to be
surveyed?
... Noting the distinction between the users of the web who
need a11y, and those who use the guidance to create content
sh: I think we'd be happy to continue to provide feedback
jgw: Any further comments? Either current questions? Or future plans?
[crickets]
jgw: Asking where the recieved comments are to be posted?
ds: So far just keeping them in a
word processor doc.
... So far, I'm in aggreement with suggestions and can forward
on their list
... Foliot had an important I18N point, but probably out of
scope for now
jgw: So, plan is that David will circulate a summary to the list, and if we're OK, will be forwarded
js: Wondering whether a formal RQTF CfC would be a good thing to do before forwarding.
ds: I'm almost ready, and people could respond
jgw: Is response by Thursday sufficient, recognizing it's a short turnaround?
[no disagreement]
jgw: Anyone with a problem reviewing in the next 24 hours?
[crickets]
ds: Yes, a good observation about providing us sufficient time to do things right.
jgw: OK, we'll respond by
tomorrow, so we can forward by Friday, if no objections.
... It's interesting to learn which resources are helpful to
which stakeholders.
... That certainly suggests more detail in the surveys in the
future
jb: Reads questions re authentication that were privately circulated ...
js: Had thought they went to list
<scott_h> +1 for circulating questions to web authentications from me!
jgw: Asking whether any mods to these questions?
sh: Asks whether wai-ig would be too broad?
jb: Suggest we work on building up the questions first
jgw: So, we'll work on how we contextualize, and present here next week.
[general discussion on how VR can assist]
<Judy> js: it's going to be a larger discussion than usual
jgw: Noting the coming APA discussion may present research questions for us
<Judy> js: many interesting topics and applications. charles lapierre gave a good presentation at the vr workshop last fall.
<Judy> js: many good & interesting applications of vr that go well beyond entertainment, application, etc
<Judy> jb: yes, both with regard to accessible design of mainstream vr applications, also with regard to potential applications of vr to dsiability and accessibility topics
<Judy> jason: any other comments and questions? please review things in the coming days and weeks.
<Judy> jason: adjourned.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Default Present: janina, shadi, scott_h, sloandr, Judy Present: janina shadi scott_h sloandr Judy Found Scribe: janina Inferring ScribeNick: janina WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 07 Jun 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/06/07-rqtf-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]