See also: IRC log
<kpaulh> +present
scribe
I will scribe
TPAC is coming up and WebAuthn has requested a slot
<wseltzer> scribenick: angelo
TPAC is a whole week. The exact slot for webauthn will be out by next few weeks
We will aim at having WebAppSec meeting and the WebAuthn meeting in two different slots
<wseltzer> I'll convey TPAC preferences -- to avoid end of week before IETF
379 is ongoing. Jeff will try to work on it today or tomorrow
Sorry Angelo will work on 379
427 also needs a little more works. Jeff will work on 427
JeffH: we should use squash merge on github so that we can avoid noises in the merge history
470: Angelo still need to do some work on that front
476 and 477 needs more attention and time to check references
We are now at 479
Giri: to clarify, once these PRs are meged in, does that mean no client extension is around anymore?
Rolf: I think you are correct
Tony: does 479 add a lot more burden on the authenticator?
Rolf: the authenticatorData already contains AAGUID
Angelo: I am still concerned about how the flow will look like. The RPs now has a lot more burden to go through.
Rolf: It's the RP's choice as to how they want to select. But I will add examples
We are looking at 460
MikeJ: How authenticator processes the information needs to written down because the actual operation is missing
Alexei: I need to spend some time writing this down
Tony: MikeJ, can you spend some time helping with this?
MikeJ: I will help out
We are looking at 416
JeffH: once PR 464 is merged, 416 should be closed.
My mistake. 464 is already merged. 416 is closed.
We are looking at 167
JeffH: I am hoping one of the browser wizard can look at it.
Jeffrey: I think this one is ready to close
167 is closed.
We are now at 182
JeffH: which order are we going at?
Tony: we are looking at all WD-06 issues and looking from bottom up
<wseltzer> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/milestone/10
We are looking at 349
Angelo: I am not familiar with
CTAP spec. So I am hoping someone can help me out here.
... I have some bandwidth to do this work. I can probably get
on 349 sometime this week
We are looking at 245
245: Angelo: I haven't had a chance to look at Jeff's comment yet. I will add some response this week.
We are looking at 393
JeffH: we should do it but I haven't had bandwidth yet
We are looking at 383
283
We have some easy ones to deal with. Hopefully we can get them done by next week but they will depend on when the hard ones are done.
We are looking at 362
JeffH: maybe we should move this out to CR
We are looking at 469
We can move 469 out to CR
We should do 380 in WD-06
Angelo: I will talk to my team's Fetch guys about 380 and then we can see if we want to get it done in WD-06
Tony: when is an achievable target for WD-06?
Our current target is mid-June.
345 is moved to WD-06
<jeffh> adios
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Default Present: present, jeffh, wseltzer, selfissued, Rolf, christiaan, battre, alexei-goog, dirk, jyasskin, gmandyam, nadalin Present: present jeffh wseltzer selfissued Rolf christiaan battre alexei-goog dirk jyasskin gmandyam nadalin jfontana Regrets: weiler Found ScribeNick: angelo Inferring Scribes: angelo Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2017May/0378.html Found Date: 31 May 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/05/31-webauthn-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]