<ChrisLittle> +0 not there
<eparsons> +0 absent
Resolved: Approving last meeting's minutes
eparsons: Reads the Patent Call
tidoust: Next public working draft should be published tomorrow
jtandy: Were you able to add a diff?
tidoust: No, because we have not done this so far and it is not required
jtandy: Can you give us an update on the process for this sprint?
<joshlieberman_> The timing issues are of more concern for W3C Rec and OGC Implementation Spec
tidoust: Can only speak for W3C, where the requirements for a Note are not high as expressed in my email
tidoust: If we want a horizontal review, this might make sense for the Best Practices, but it is optional
jtandy: (Discusses Scott's email from yesterday about the schedule from the OGC side)
<eparsons> what joshlieberman_ said +1
joshlieberman_: If the vote needs to finish in June, the vote would need to start in mid May plus the 3-week rule
joshlieberman_: Maybe 2 weeks are fine as expressed by Scott due to prior versions of the document being shared with the OGC members regularly
jtandy: So we could target April 26 for the vote for release
<eparsons> not going on holiday :-(
jtandy: How do we feel about this?
joshlieberman_: Let's try to get as much done as we can in the time
Linda: We wanted to go through an extra call to resolve the remaining open 44 (?) issues. Many of the can probably be closed without much discussion.
Linda: When should we do it?
<eparsons> I can do this time next week
<joshlieberman_> Next week bad for me (AAG meeting)
jtandy: Same time next week?
<ChrisLittle> +1 to next week
ClemensPortele: next week is also bad for me
<eparsons> earlier in ok for me on the 5th
<AndreaPerego> No way next week for me - at RDA from Wed to Fri.
Linda: earlier would be better, if we need 3 hours
jtandy: Maybe in 1 hour blocks? Start next week? Do we need 3 hours?
eparsons: We should try to get as much done next week as possible
jtandy: Let's go through the issues and close as much as we can. If anyone has a concern about closing an issue it may be re-opened.
<eparsons> 15:00 BST ?
ChrisLittle: maybe 90 minutes, longer is hard in a web-meeting
jtandy: Let's do 2 hours, starting 14:00 GMT
jtandy: Put the tricky issues at the front
eparsons: Will go through the public comments next Tuesday
jtandy: Look also at Payam's list
AndreaPerego: (on the previous topic) I will not be available next Wednesday, maybe have a call earlier, e.g. Friday this week?
Linda: Friday does not work for me
Linda: But I can look at the issues earlier and flag issues relevant for AndreaPerego, if I know what topics he is interested in
jtandy: The issue resolution process should not interfere with the work on the BPs in general
jtandy: We could have a direct call to discuss BP8 on Friday?
AndreaPerego: Yes, that would be fine
jtandy: Anyone else interested?
<eparsons> Friday is _1 for me
jtandy: Based on the F2F this has been rewritten
jtandy: I will update "how to use" section
joshlieberman_: Fine with BP1
ClemensPortele: Fine with BP4 and BP11
jtandy: Will check with Peter Parslow
jtandy: And I have several BPs that I will take care of
jtandy: (Goes through the list of BP changes)
AndreaPerego: Asks for help from joshlieberman_ to refactor into 2 best practices
jtandy: BP17, I will discuss the WKT coordinate order change with AndreaPerego on Friday
jtandy: Let's wait with the conclusion section until the end of the sprint
Linda: I am working on a paper on the Best Practices and we may be able to reuse some of that work
jtandy: File formats and vocabularies as planned
jtandy: The section on benefits, the requirements cross-reference and the glossary, too
Linda: The reordering is a bigger task
Linda: Input on the proposals is required - and discussion
Linda: available this week and next, then on holiday, back the week starting April 17
jtandy: We should target that week then
<ChrisLittle> +1 to that week for restucturing\
Linda: That works, but I need the input before
jtandy: Issue resolution has already been discussed
jtandy: BP8 and BP10 seem to be the toughest ones for this sprint
jtandy: Please get back, in case you need help
ChrisLittle: Was the Time Ontology discussed at F2F?
<Zakim> AndreaPerego, you wanted to ask about slides for RDA
eparsons: No, neither Chris nor Simon were there
AndreaPerego: Simon offered to present the SDW work at RDA, but he needs slides. Are slides available?
jtandy: Similar request from Armin, see list of available slides in that email exchange (mostly older slides)
AndreaPerego: These are needed next week
Linda: Will provided up-to-date 2 slides on the BP
jtandy: I think we have a pretty clear plan for the sprint
<Linda> have to go bye
tidoust: I will set up the Webex for the call next Wednesday (April 5)
<eparsons> Get well soon Linda xx
<jtandy> +1 to LvdB getting well soon