See also: IRC log
<Lisa_Seeman> trackbot, start meeting
<Lisa_Seeman_> agenda: this
<Lisa_Seeman_> instuctions: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1,
<Lisa_Seeman_> issues: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3ACOGA
<Lisa_Seeman_> pull requests: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3ACOGA
<Lisa_Seeman> i think the call is now
<Lisa_Seeman> scribe: Jim_S
Lisa: Hopes to publish the 1st
working draft for the semantics of personalisation this
month
... Andy Heath sees overalp between our Working Group and ISO
standards
Mike_Pluke: There are two ISO standards relating to COGA
Lisa: compatibility with other standards is a worthy goal
No other updates
<Lisa_Seeman> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EVnmFO6l8nAdBs5UiasJnZz3Ri_diKcoz8peoPWTm4Q/edit#
Lisa: Draft invite e-mail is
availabe on Google Docs (link above) for Outreach
... Has anyone reached out to dyslexia organisations?
E.A.: will reach out to British and European
Dyslexia Associations
... and also the Intrenational Dyslexia Association
Jan: will reach out to US organisations
Mike_Pluke: will contact team developing Autism tools
John Kirkwood: will contact medical organisations in USA
<EA> I have just had a reply from on person from BDA who commented about difficulty with Github
<Lisa_Seeman> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EVnmFO6l8nAdBs5UiasJnZz3Ri_diKcoz8peoPWTm4Q/edit#
Jim to contact Dementia groups in UK
Pietro: will contact Autism Europe
Pietro will also contact national branches where possible
Lisa: we need user feedback as well as developer feedback
<Pietro> European Disability Forum too
E.A.: reported that users find the process too
complex and do not wish to use GitHub
... feels that we need to break things down into bite-size
chunks
<Pietro> and Inclusion Europe
Lisa: requests that E.A. forward the user feeedback in question
Jim_S: suggests that we break the document down into chunks of individual SC
Lisa: proposes that the SC have a short explaination of why the COGA SC are important in plain language before the SC text
Lisa will set up Google Doc and write, Jan will edit and E.A. will help with editing if she can (as will Jim_S)
<Lisa_Seeman> ACTION: Jan to write simple version for the wcag draft - all to edit .... [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-coga-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-202 - Write simple version for the wcag draft - all to edit .... [on Jan McSorley - due 2017-03-20].
<Lisa_Seeman> ACTION: Lisa to make a new document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-coga-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-203 - Make a new document [on Lisa Seeman-Kestenbaum - due 2017-03-20].
Lisa: can Pietro provide two
symbols to identify the introduction and the SC Text?
... Need three sections: Plain Langague Introduction, SC Text
and why it is important.
<Lisa_Seeman> On coga github: accessible-authentication.html wcag issue 23
Mike-Pluke will look at providing alternative wording for the Accessible Authentication SC
<Lisa_Seeman> ACTION: mike to sugets how to spit up On coga github: accessible-authentication.html wcag issue 23 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-coga-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-204 - Sugets how to spit up on coga github: accessible-authentication.html wcag issue 23 [on Mike Pluke - due 2017-03-20].
Clear Controls and Personalisation will be discussed this week on the WCAG call
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/March14SCReviews/
Lisa: can people complete the survey (above)
MichaelC: Comments on SC are still being made on GitHub
Lisa: asked which SC are considered high priority
<Lisa_Seeman> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/status.html
https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/status.html
MichaelC is working on normalising the commenting and versioning of the SC for surveys
Lisa and others: There is no clarity on what we are voting on in the surveys
<Lisa_Seeman> + <h4>Clear Controls</h4>
<Lisa_Seeman> + <p class="conformance-level">AA</p>
<Lisa_Seeman> + <p><strong>Clear controls:</strong> Visual interactive controls are clear or clear controls are <a>easily available</a> through personalization that conforms to all of the following:</p>
<Lisa_Seeman> + <ul>
<Lisa_Seeman> + <li>Interactive controls are visually discriminable and have a border around the interactive area of the element with a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 with its background, or has fill that provides a contrast ratio of at least 3:1 from the background. It is sufficient for links to be consistently underlined.</li>
<Lisa_Seeman> + <li>Interactive controls are available in a standard style that indicates how they can be used and what action it will trigger or have clearly labelled instructions that explains their use.</li>
<Lisa_Seeman> + </ul>
<Lisa_Seeman> + <p>An exception is available if the style is an essential part of the main function of the site, such as for a game.</p>
MichaelC: the survey is not an approval survey it is to generate information on what is required to get the survey ready for review
E.A.: expressed concern about new comments that have not been addressed
Jim_S to ask Neil to address comment on SC 36
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: Jim_S MaryJoMueller Lisa_Seeman kirkwood_ Mike_Pluke jan_mcsorley Pietro janina Found Scribe: Jim_S Inferring ScribeNick: Jim_S WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 13 Mar 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-coga-minutes.html People with action items: jan lisa mike WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]