OCF/WoT Liaison Task Force Charter

<yingying> https://github.com/mmccool/wot/blob/a9e934e52b2296a1088a82eb25ac27c1ca33864b/proposals/liaison-ocf/charter.md

<kaz> Liaison wiki

<inserted> scribenick: kaz

michael: making the minutes the TF internally would be better (for a while)
... generating the charter for the TF

<inserted> scribenick: yingying

Michael: target is to make it possible to get ahead of OCF recommendation before published. On OCF side there is similar group.
... benefits of OCF and W3C are described in the charter.
... for the deliverables, some might belong to IG and some WG.
... you guys can review this and give comments.
... the critical thing is we have to make the communication public.
... do we want to make liaison a TF.

<inserted> scribenick: yingying_

daniel: currently 4 people in the TF. They need to join the WG as well.

<kaz> pull request 292

<inserted> scribenick: kaz

kaz: for mainly Daniel, we'll have a dedicated call with the WG co-Chairs ant the WG staff contacts (probably on Friday)
... and the agenda topics include how to deal with liaison with external SDOs

mccool: would it make sense for liaison in general?

kaz: yes
... we should have discussion with both the IG co-Chairs and the WG co-Chairs
... we should have discussion on who should be the main liaison contact for which SDO

michael: right

kaz: btw, what would be the relationship between the liaison tf and this comm tf?

michael: this liaison tf is specific for the OCF liaison

kaz: including the right of the possible deliverable document generated by OCF or W3C

michael: yeah
... basically, OCF documents become public and then brought to W3C
... but for the quicker progress sometimes we might want to look at unpublished version draft beforehand
... btw, will you bring this topic to the IG main call in 2 hours?
... yes, just summary though

Launching WG

yingying: Xueyuan is preparing for the announcement

kaz: will talk with the co-Chairs about the WG page, etc.

yingying: good idea

IG co-Chair change

kaz: waiting for response from Matthias
... but it would make sense to make the announcement along with the WG announcement

oneM2M liaison

kaz: will talk with the Liaison Team
... and then forward the liaison letter to the group

OPC liaison

kaz: we should check with the IG co-Chairs about their opinions

yingying: will respond to the email thread on the possible invited expert for OPC liaison

Long Term topics

yingying: let's talk about long term topics next time

[ adjourned ]