See also: IRC log
I will scribe for this meetingg
<jcj_moz> scribenick: angelo
Next week will be IETF week and the WG meeting will not be held next week
The week after next week will be thanksgiving week
Should we cancel the meeting the week after next week? We will try to keep the meeting that week because we are behind the schedule.
We are on PR #102
PR was posted by Rolf, who is not present. Vijay has posted comments on this one.
PR 102: Rolf added a section on how to verify webauthn assertion
<RobTrace> +1 move PR102 to WD4
We are discussing #243
PR #229 is accepted
We are now discussing PR #235
It'd be good to have Rolf double-check on the language for PR #235
Vijay is ok with the change
There are some contentious points about #235. Alexei will respond to that.
There is no clear documentation for CBOR mapping. This issue will addressed in a separate conversation.
Alexei will take a look at PR #235 before we merge it
Is any issue on WD-03 that is not addressed by a open pull request?
Issue #88 is moved to WD-04
Vijay believes we should first address the overall attestation format browser parsing problem and then we move on to the U2F attestation format
Issue #88 is not addressed by a open PR
Is issue #95 addressed by a open pull request? No. But we plan to punt it to WD-04
The current spec uses different representation for algorithms. Vijay believes we should stick to one representation.
#123 is porposed to be punted to WD-04
#123 is punted
Issue #213 is punted
issue #238 is proposed to be punted
#252 and #247 are addressed by a open PR
All the rest of the issues are addressed by PR
All the rest of the issues for WD-03 are addressed by PR
Once all current PRs are closed, should we be ready to publish a working draft?
Once all current PRs are closed, we will publish a new working draft
FIDO alliance communication is planning a event in early December. They want to ask us what status we are at.
we can release a statement about WebAuthn testing
If we make progress on the tests, we can start releasing statements about testing.
<jcj_moz> Can someone paste a link to apowers' PR?
The PR team wants to talk about what webauthn is, how exciting webauthn is, etc.
<jcj_moz> apowers: thanks
The main thing is releasing signals that the WG are still on track
The issues opened by Boris are concise and clearly stated, which makes it easier for them to be addressed.
We will plan to release WD-04 sometime before holidays in December
<Zakim> weiler, you wanted to ask if there are any (WD-04) issues that would benefit from face time (at IETF next week?)
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.148 of Date: 2016/10/11 12:55:14 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/preesent+ nadalin// Found ScribeNick: angelo Inferring Scribes: angelo Default Present: jcj_moz, jeffh, vgb, angelo, RobTrace, seltzer, apowers, Ketan, nadalin, Alexei WARNING: Replacing previous Present list. (Old list: (no, one), jcj_moz, jeffh, vgb, scribe, RobTrace) Use 'Present+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Present+ jcj_moz, jeffh, vgb, angelo, RobTrace Present: jcj_moz jeffh vgb angelo RobTrace seltzer apowers Ketan nadalin Alexei Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2016Nov/0142.html Found Date: 09 Nov 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/11/09-webauthn-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]