W3C

- DRAFT -

XForms Users Community Group Teleconference

02 Nov 2016

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Alain, Erik, Philip, Steven
Regrets
None
Chair
Steven
Scribe
Steven

Contents


Parsing JSON

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Oct/0067

Steven: FYI
... interesting information

StackOverflow answer

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Oct/0077

Steven: Thanks for the good answer.
... I might add an answer pointing to major organisations who are using it.

model@version

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0001

Steven: I have made the change

bind@model

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0003

Steven: I made that change

dispatch@targetid

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0015

Steven: I made that change

in-scope evaluation context

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0014.html

[pause while the mail is read]

Erik: We touched on this long ago
... In which case do we need to switch models
... It is not *really* intended to work in this way, but we need to say what happens when we change model in the hierarchy
... in our implementation we don't exactly do what is in the spec
... statically you know what model is referred to because of @model, but you don't know what the model is you are switching from statically, only dynamically. It might be the same model
... you need to compute the context item all the way, and then see if you need to switch.
... I have never liked it, but...
... I do not like the way it is specified now. I think we can do better.
... two ways to do it: 1 - remove the dependency on the comparison between the model of the context item and the @model
... to explain what we do I would need to write it down.

<scribe> ACTION: Erik to write down his impmplementation's version of in-scope evaluation [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/11/02-forms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-2087 - Write down his implementation's version of in-scope evaluation [on Erik Bruchez - due 2016-11-09].

Steven: If we could make the spec text clearer and more obvious, that would be great.

AOB

[None]

[ADJOURNED]

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Erik to write down his impmplementation's version of in-scope evaluation [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/11/02-forms-minutes.html#action01]
 

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.148 (CVS log)
$Date: 2016/11/02 13:22:05 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.148  of Date: 2016/10/11 12:55:14  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/rou/tou/
Succeeded: s/impmplementation's/implementation's/
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: Steven
Inferring Scribes: Steven
Present: Alain Erik Philip Steven
Regrets: None
Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0016
Found Date: 02 Nov 2016
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/11/02-forms-minutes.html
People with action items: erik

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]