See also: IRC log
<clown> agenda: this
<scribe> scribe: joanie
JS: I'm not here for the next two
weeks.
... If you want to meet, you can do so.
... Is there any interest in meeting?
BG: I don't think it would be especially productive.
JS: Rich is driven since he wants
to get ARIA 1.1 out.
... Do you want to chair, Cynthia? :)
CS: I'm pretty busy these days.
JS: So I'll send out an email
saying no meeting the next two weeks.
... If you change your mind, contact Michael to set up
WebEx.
... So the next meeting will be on May 24th.
<clown> action-2043?
<trackbot> action-2043 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Modify UIA mapping of role="status" -- due 2016-03-28 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2043
JS: This has gone through one set of reviews.
CS: Didn't we talk about this last week?
JS: We talked about it two weeks
ago.
... Cynthia wanted to make the localized control type be
status.
<clown> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-status
JS: I made that change.
... The URL above has the update.
<clown> • Control Type: Group
<clown> • Localized Control Type: status
<clown> • LiveSettingProperty = Polite (1)
JS: I'll copy the full text (above)
JD: We need to do something similar for ATK and IA2 I bet.
CS: This looks fine for my platform.
JS: I think there's an issue in github for this.
CS: Yes, I opened one.
JS: We'll wait until things
settle down to have that discussion.
... I will close action-2043.
<clown> action-2054?
<trackbot> action-2054 -- Matthew King to Expand aria-haspopup to support a token list of values -- due 2016-04-28 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2054
JS: I know that Matt King has put
forth a proposal for aria-haspopup.
... I think it's reached CfC.
CS: It has.
<clown> issue-540
<trackbot> issue-540 -- Should the UAIG have a section to describe the API differences -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/540
JS: I think on Thursday it will
go through.
... So we'll need mappings.
<clown> issue-1025
<trackbot> issue-1025 -- Drive mappings of the new enumerated type values for aria-haspopup -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1025
<clown> action-1026
<trackbot> Sorry, but action-1026 does not exist.
<clown> action-2056
<trackbot> action-2056 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to Coordinate the mappings for the various AAPIs of the enumerated aria-haspopup values -- due 2016-05-17 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2056
JS: Rich has an action to
coordinate the mappings for this.
... He'll be contacting you.
... So it's a reminder.
CS: I don't know about anyone else, but I don't have anywhere to map it.
<clown> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaHaspopupTrue
JS: Not even in ARIA properties?
CS: It will be in ARIA
properties, but that's not a real mapping.
... What we do now is use the expand/collapse pattern.
... I'll keep looking.
JS: I wonder what AXAPI is going
to do.
... I think ATK and MSAA will use the object attribute
technique.
JD: Confirmed.
<clown> action-1569?
<trackbot> action-1569 -- Cynthia Shelly to Create a section that describes AAPI differences -- due 2016-05-03 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1569
JS: I had sent email to Jason
Kiss a while back about the API differences section.
... He replied that he has some minor suggestions for the UIA
content, which Cynthia wrote.
... I forwarded Cynthia the email.
<clown> Fwd: Re: Section of Core-AAM that describes AAPI differences (ACTION-1569)
JS: Essentially, he wants to capitalize some technical terms.
<clown> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#uia
CS: That's fine.
JS: Special font or just
capitalized?
... Capitalized is fine.
... I will try to do this by the end of the week so we can
close this out.
... If I make this change, can I just close the action?
CS: Yes.
JD: Thanks for the ping. :)
<clown> action-1409?
<trackbot> action-1409 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Monitor progress of bug against atk in gnome's bugzilla requesting new position, level, and other api be added (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727453) -- due 2016-04-07 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1409
<clown> action-1668?
<trackbot> action-1668 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Add a ia2_role_landmark to ia2. this will tell ats to look at the xml-roles value for landmarks -- due 2015-07-07 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1668
JS: I have a question about this one.
<clown> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-form
JS: Rich had a dialog with Alex
about the IA2 mapping of the role form.
... Alex accepted mapping it as a landmark.
... And use the xml-roles object attribute.
... This makes the mapping consistent with the other
landmarks.
... So I've done it. I think I can close it now.
... Last week we discussed whether the WebAim folks thought the
form element should be treated as a landmark.
... One other thing I've done is because the landmark roles
have all changed drastically, I've put an ARIA 1.1 tag by each
landmark.
<clown> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-banner
JS: For instance, if you look at
banner (above), you'll see the ARIA 1.1 tag.
... I think we'll need to test the landmark roles for 1.1 due
to the changes.
... And this tag will help me find them.
... Any objections?
Group: None.
JS: It doesn't mean the role was introduced in 1.1; just that we need to retest.
<clown> action-1668
<trackbot> action-1668 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Add a ia2_role_landmark to ia2. this will tell ats to look at the xml-roles value for landmarks -- due 2015-07-07 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1668
JS: Can I now close this action?
JD: Was the mapping of ATK made consistent with IA2?
<clown> ROLE_LANDMARK + object attribute xml-roles:form
JS: Yes. It's above.
... Hearing no objections to closing this action....
... Closed.
JS: Triage!
<clown> action-980?
<trackbot> action-980 -- Cynthia Shelly to Describe/define managed aria related states: aria-setsize, aria-posinset, aria-level, focused, focusable with reference to section 5.5 bullet 1 of the UAIG. -- due 2016-05-03 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/980
JS: A new one (action-980).
... Cynthia, this is the section that describes and defines
managed states.
CS: Give me another two weeks.
action-1533
<trackbot> action-1533 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Investigate and possibly create a minimal/skeleton javascript at-spi2 listener with the aim of automating the 1.1 tests. -- due 2016-03-15 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1533
<clown> action-1533?
<trackbot> action-1533 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Investigate and possibly create a minimal/skeleton javascript at-spi2 listener with the aim of automating the 1.1 tests. -- due 2016-03-15 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1533
JS: So, Joanie, how's this coming?
JD: I'm busy this week, but plan
to start on it next week.
... Extend two weeks please.
CS: Were you going to look at IA2 and Mac as well?
JD: Not entirely sure yet. I need to start with my platform first, of course. But I'll try.
<clown> action-1593
<trackbot> action-1593 -- Cynthia Shelly to Compare implementations of AAPI managed states and look for gaps. -- due 2016-05-03 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1593
<clown> issue-706
<trackbot> issue-706 -- Describe/define AAPI managed states -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/706
CS: This seems like a duplicate
of the earlier managed-states action.
... There may have originally been a distinction, but I don't
recall what it is.
JS: I'll close this one out as a
duplicate then.
... The other one is action-980, right?
... Yes.
<clown> action-1681?
<trackbot> action-1681 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Propose new wording, as an editorial change only to clarify the inclusion rules in section 5.1.2 -- due 2016-04-12 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1681
JS: I've been trying to do
this.
... I've started, but not finished.
... I hope to be finished by the end of the week.
... I'm glad I have Rich's section to point to, but Matt has
raised some issues.
... So I'm going to postpone it for three weeks (one week after
I get back).
<clown> action-1686
<trackbot> action-1686 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Drive mapping of aria-errormessage to aapis -- due 2015-07-23 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1686
JS: We have a bunch of errormessage actions.
<clown> action-1692
<trackbot> action-1692 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Propose ATK/AT-SPI mapping for aria-errormessage -- due 2015-08-04 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1692
JD: Aren't we stalled on
this?
... I had proposed new relation types.
... But then in subsequent discussion, things seemed to have
stalled.
... This is on the IA2 list.
JS: It's also on the ARIA
list.
... The most recent discussion was in April.
<clown> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Apr/0132.html
JS: I think it's the message at
the above URL.
... (Reads from message)
CS: I can talk about how we do
our error messages which are built into the browser.
... We have a separate accessible object and a
controller-for.
... And the message is exposed through the help text.
... So it's both a linked-to object and a descriptive
string.
... Help text is whatever is in the tooltip.
JS: I don't see a UIA action for errormessage.
<clown> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaErrorMessage
JS: Maybe we completed it.
... Yes, the mapping for UIA is above.
<clown> UIA aria-errormessage mapping: "Expose pointer to the target accessible object using ControllerFor property."
JD: Should the mapping include exposing the string via your help text attribute?
CS: I'm ok with it being a SHOULD; not a MUST.
JS: Do you want to add anything to the UIA mapping, or leave it as it is?
CS: I'm fine with leaving it as it is.
JS: I guess we're stuck with the other platforms.
<clown> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaControls
JD: I think ATK is blocked on IA2's mapping because a number of people want ATK and IA2 to be parallel whenever possible.
Group: Discusses and reads specs and API docs on "controls" and "controller".
JD + JS: This seems like controls/controller do not quite fit here.
JD: We can propose this to Jamie, but I don't think he'll embrace this mapping.
JS: Should we bring this up to the group on Thursday first?
JD: Fine with me.
JS: I'll leave these items as red so they come up next time.
<clown> action-1695
<trackbot> action-1695 -- Cynthia Shelly to Propose UIA mapping for aria-kbdshortcuts -- due 2016-03-08 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1695
CS: I did this a while ago.
JS: (Reads from action)
... So what is the mapping if I were to write it out?
CS: AcceleratorKey is the best mapping for now.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/You wanted/Cynthia wanted/ Succeeded: s/firest/first/ Found embedded ScribeOptions: -final *** RESTARTING DUE TO EMBEDDED OPTIONS *** Found Scribe: joanie Inferring ScribeNick: joanie Default Present: Joseph_Scheuhammer, Joanmarie_Diggs, Bryan_Garaventa, Cynthia_Shelly Present: Joseph_Scheuhammer Joanmarie_Diggs Bryan_Garaventa Cynthia_Shelly Regrets: Richard_Schwerdtfeger Found Date: 03 May 2016 People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]