ISSUE-76: New requirement for multiple CRSs?
multiple CRSs
New requirement for multiple CRSs?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Use Cases and Requirements
- Raised by:
- Frans Knibbe
- Opened on:
- 2016-09-09
- Description:
- Discussion on issue-70 led to the possible need for an additional requirement -that is should be possible to publish geometry data with multiple CRSs.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-09-26)
- [Minutes F2F] 2016-09-19 (from phila@w3.org on 2016-09-20)
- Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from eparsons@google.com on 2016-09-14)
- RE: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from bcochrane@linz.govt.nz on 2016-09-14)
- Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from rob@metalinkage.com.au on 2016-09-13)
- Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from eparsons@google.com on 2016-09-13)
- Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from rob@metalinkage.com.au on 2016-09-13)
- RE: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from bcochrane@linz.govt.nz on 2016-09-13)
- Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from rob@metalinkage.com.au on 2016-09-12)
- Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-09-12)
- Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-09-12)
- Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com on 2016-09-12)
- Re: UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from rob@metalinkage.com.au on 2016-09-12)
- Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-09-09)
- UCR issue-76: a new requirement for multiple CRSs? (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-09-09)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log