Research and Development Working Group Teleconference

Headings

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/47076/RDWG-270115/results#xheads

<mhakkinen> Description Background and State-of-the-Art Challenges Research Goals

VC: proposal by David Sloan
... I concur with that

SAZ: what would we want to have in this section?

VC: challenges in using accrediation schemes

<luz> Maybe "Transfere"

AN: like "challenges" but could apply to any topic
... could be challenges in applying
... or challenges that people observe
... depending on the topic
... if we get to specific then we lose flexibility

MH: also try to think about the gaps
... what is it that we don't know
... maybe research gaps

<luz> I like Challenges and Gaps

VC: next section is "research goals"

SAZ: "challenges and gaps"?

VC: like it

MH: maybe can keep it simple with challenges
... gaps can be a sub-part of that

VC: proposal is section called just "challenges"

+1

<annika> +1

<Vivienne> +1

<mhakkinen> +1

<luz> yes

<luz> +1

<mhakkinen> +1 to introduction

VC: "overview" or "introduction" rather than "description"?

<Vivienne> +1 introduction

<annika> +1

+1 both fine by me

<luz> yes

VC: keep "state-of-the-art" as a separate section?

AN: like "current situation" or "current practices"
... current "situation" may be more open

<mhakkinen> +1

AN: some topics may not have "practice" (yet)

+1

<mhakkinen> Agree that "current situation" is more open

<Vivienne> agree with current situation also

VC: keep as two sections or together with background?

SAZ: no keep separate

<annika> +1 (two separate sections)

<mhakkinen> +1 to keep separate

VC: not providing much about current practice

SAZ: we'll need to be clear how much detail vs brief we want to be

<luz> +1

SAZ: need to keep separate from symposia call for papers

VC: "opportunities for research"?

SAZ: or just "research opportunities"?

<luz> "Reseach Oportunities" +1

MH: like the opportunities

<Vivienne> +1 to research opportunities

MH: may not even have arranged specific questions yet

<annika> +1 to opportunities

+1

<mhakkinen> +1

VC: will have a look and try out these new titles

"Research Topic: Accreditation"

VC: think "catalogue entry" is confusing

SAZ: can just drop it

<mhakkinen> +1

<annika> +1

<Vivienne> +1

<mhakkinen> +1 to leaving them in

<luz> +1

MH: change "categorization and tags" to "keywords"?

<annika> +1 to keywords

+1

<mhakkinen> +1 to keywords

<Vivienne> +1 to leave them in and say 'keywords'

Related W3C Activities

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/47076/RDWG-270115/results#xstds

<mhakkinen> +1 to specific heading

VC: suggestion for specific section

MH: think makes it relevant to other W3C groups

<annika> W3C activities could be a subsection under background

<mhakkinen> Related W3C Activities: Listing Active/Inactive

<mhakkinen> Domains, Groups, Standards

SAZ: are we talking about groups or standards, or both?

<luz> +1 for Standarization

<luz> !

<annika> +1 to list all activities not only standards

<Vivienne> +1

AN: may be on-going work, not finalized standards

SAZ: proposed title "standardization"
... under that could be W3C or "external"

AN: could this be under "current situation"?
... otherwise may have too many sections

MH: standardization could be side-bar but should be quick to spot
... just a list

AN: just the W3C part could be the side bar, that makes sense
... "external" should be under "current practice"

MH: agree with that

Catalog Home

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/47076/RDWG-270115/results#xshape

SAZ: could combine Annika's and Klaus' suggestions