Meetings:Telecon2016.04.14

Thursday at 2pm US Eastern time for 90 minutes
  Please check your timezone:
  -- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?msg=RDF+Data+Shapes+meeting&iso=20160407T11&p1=224&p2=43&p3=195&p4=26&p5=240 
 WebEx (for audio): https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2f433ba94951cf59f6da984c15500e5e
  To join by phone: +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number
  Access code/Meeting number: 646 464 360
IRC channel: #shapes on irc.w3.org on port 6665 (irc link, W3C web irc link)
To start meeting (ignore errors related to Zakim not knowing what teleconf this is): trackbot, start meeting
Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent

Admin

• Chair: Arnaud
• Scribe: Harold Solbrig, or first available on the scribe list.

Minutes of last meeting

PROPOSED: Approve minutes of the 7 April 2016 Telecon: http://www.w3.org/2016/04/07-shapes-minutes.html

Next meeting

• 2016.04.21

Disposal of Raised Issues

PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-143, ISSUE-145, ISSUE-146, ISSUE-147

Discuss ISSUE-144

• ISSUE-143: pre-binding in core
• ISSUE-144: substitution
• ISSUE-145: minExclusive code incorrect
• ISSUE-146: sh:qualifiedMinCount
• ISSUE-147: vocabulary typos

ISSUE-78: sh:abstract

PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-78, without adding sh:abstract, given that sh:ShapeClass was dropped

• ISSUE-78: Should SHACL support marking classes as abstract
• ISSUE-78 Proposals & Votes
• Last discussed on 7 Apr 2016

ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism

PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-95, adopting Proposal 3 https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-95:_Metamodel_simplifications#Proposal_3

• ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism
• ISSUE-95 Latest Proposals
• ISSUE-133 Syntax
• Last discussed on 17 Mar 2016

ISSUE-135: and/or syntactic sugar

Discuss ISSUE-135: Should sh:and, sh:or, sh:not, and sh:valueShape support constraints too?

• ISSUE-135 Proposals & Votes
• ISSUE-141: Mixed ranges

ISSUE-138: Property constraints as lists

Discuss ISSUE-138: Should property constraints use rdf:Lists?

• ISSUE-138 Proposals & Votes

ISSUE-133: syntax

Discuss ISSUE-133: syntax simplification and regularization

• ISSUE-133 Proposals & Votes
• Proposal 4

ISSUE-139: Universal applicability

Discuss ISSUE-139: Can all constraint properties be applied in all scenarios?

• ISSUE-139 Proposals & Votes

Other open issues, time permitting

• Open Issues

AOB