Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Meetings:Telecon2016.02.11
From RDF Data Shapes Working Group
Thursday at 2pm US Eastern time for 90 minutes The US and Europe should be back on the usual time offset, but please effect check your timezone: -- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?msg=RDF+Data+Shapes+meeting&iso=20160211T11&p1=224&p2=43&p3=195&p4=26&p5=240 WebEx (for audio): https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2f433ba94951cf59f6da984c15500e5e To join by phone: +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number Access code/Meeting number: 646 464 360 IRC channel: #shapes on irc.w3.org on port 6665 (irc link, W3C web irc link) To start meeting (ignore errors related to Zakim not knowing what teleconf this is): trackbot, start meeting Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Contents
Admin
- Chair: Arnaud
- Scribe: Dimitris Kontokostas, or first available on the scribe list.
Minutes of last meeting
PROPOSED: Approve minutes of the 4 February 2016 Telecon: http://www.w3.org/2016/02/04-shapes-minutes.html
Next meeting
- 2016.02.18
New WG member
- Jim Amsden from IBM joined the WG
Disposal of Raised Issue
PROPOSED: Open ISSUE-121 Should the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character
- SS: Just stumbled across Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies which might be useful for solving this issue (esp. Appendix B: URI namespaces)
ISSUE-78: sh:abstract
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-78, as is, given that sh:ShapeClass was dropped
- ISSUE-78: Should SHACL support marking classes as abstract
- ISSUE-78 Proposals & Votes
- Status as of 12 Nov 2015
ISSUE-119: Defining constraints on (values of) rdf:Lists
Discuss ISSUE-119: rdf:Lists
ISSUE-47: sparqling-shape-graph
Discuss ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how?
ISSUE-57: group cardinality
Discuss ISSUE-57: Cardinalities on expressions or groups of triple constraints
