ISSUE-81: Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints?
Property pair constraints
Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Holger Knublauch
- Opened on:
- 2015-08-19
- Description:
- SKOS has several pairs of properties that must be disjoint. E.g. skos:prefLabel and skos:altLabel must not have the same values. This seems to be a recurring pattern, also supported by OWL. We may want to add something like
sh:AbstractPropertyPairConstraint
sh:argument sh:predicate1 ;
sh:argument sh:predicate2 .
sh:DisjointPropertyPairConstraint
rdfs:subClassOf sh:AbstractPropertyPairConstraint .
Another common pattern would be
sh:OrderedPropertyPairConstraint
rdfs:subClassOf sh:AbstractPropertyPairConstraint .
where all values of ?predicate1 must be < ?predicate2. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-16)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-15)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-14)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-14)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-14)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-14)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-13)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-13)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-13)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-13)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-13)
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-13)
- ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-10)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-21)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2015-08-21)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-21)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at on 2015-08-21)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-21)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-08-20)
- Re: sh:allowedValues and skos:Collection (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-19)
- shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-08-19)
Related notes:
Resolution: Close ISSUE-81, resolved as proposed in Holger's email https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2015Aug/0133.html, pending better suggestions for the names
See http://www.w3.org/2015/09/09-shapes-minutes.html#resolution09
Display change log