ISSUE-81: Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints?

Property pair constraints

Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SHACL Spec

Raised by:

Holger Knublauch

Opened on:

2015-08-19

Description:

SKOS has several pairs of properties that must be disjoint. E.g. skos:prefLabel and skos:altLabel must not have the same values. This seems to be a recurring pattern, also supported by OWL. We may want to add something like

sh:AbstractPropertyPairConstraint
sh:argument sh:predicate1 ;
sh:argument sh:predicate2 .

sh:DisjointPropertyPairConstraint
rdfs:subClassOf sh:AbstractPropertyPairConstraint .

Another common pattern would be

sh:OrderedPropertyPairConstraint
rdfs:subClassOf sh:AbstractPropertyPairConstraint .

where all values of ?predicate1 must be < ?predicate2.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-16)
2. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-15)
3. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-14)
4. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-14)
5. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-14)
6. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-14)
7. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-13)
8. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-13)
9. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-13)
10. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-13)
11. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-13)
12. Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-13)
13. ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-10)
14. Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-21)
15. Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2015-08-21)
16. Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-21)
17. Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at on 2015-08-21)
18. Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-21)
19. Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-08-20)
20. Re: sh:allowedValues and skos:Collection (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-19)
21. shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-08-19)

Related notes:

Display change log