ISSUE-166: separate out advanced part of specification
two documents
separate out advanced part of specification
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Peter Patel-Schneider
- Opened on:
- 2016-05-19
- Description:
- An external comment
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016May/0000.html
has suggested separating the SHACL specification into two documents. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-07-07)
- Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-07-07)
- ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-07-07)
- Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-07-06)
- proposed reply to Tom Baker [was Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-05-19)
- shapes-ISSUE-166 (two documents): separate out advanced part of specification [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2016-05-19)
Related notes:
RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-166, keeping the spec as one document
https://www.w3.org/2016/07/07-shapes-minutes.html#resolution05
Display change log