ISSUE-166: separate out advanced part of specification

two documents

separate out advanced part of specification

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SHACL Spec

Raised by:

Peter Patel-Schneider

Opened on:

2016-05-19

Description:

An external comment
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016May/0000.html
has suggested separating the SHACL specification into two documents.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-07-07)
2. Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-07-07)
3. ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-07-07)
4. Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-07-06)
5. proposed reply to Tom Baker [was Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-05-19)
6. shapes-ISSUE-166 (two documents): separate out advanced part of specification [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2016-05-19)

Related notes:

Display change log