16:37:16 RRSAgent has joined #audio 16:37:16 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/11/13-audio-irc 16:37:18 RRSAgent, make logs world 16:37:18 Zakim has joined #audio 16:37:20 Zakim, this will be 28346 16:37:20 ok, trackbot; I see RWC_Audio()12:00PM scheduled to start in 23 minutes 16:37:21 Meeting: Audio Working Group Teleconference 16:37:21 Date: 13 November 2014 16:37:37 agenda? 16:37:53 Agenda+ Web Audio Conference Session 16:38:04 Agenda+ Assign open issues which need WG decision to V1 or V.next 16:38:13 Agenda+ Decide on issues marked as “Needs WG Review" to discuss for next call (what can we discuss outside of the telecon) 16:38:22 Agenda+ AOB 16:38:26 agenda? 16:39:00 rrsagent, pointer? 16:39:00 See http://www.w3.org/2014/11/13-audio-irc#T16-39-00 16:39:53 Previous meeting minutes -> http://www.w3.org/2014/10/27-audio-minutes.html 16:40:02 http://www.w3.org/2014/10/28-audio-minutes.html 16:42:32 Chair: joe 16:57:30 hongchan has joined #audio 16:59:11 RWC_Audio()12:00PM has now started 16:59:18 +??P11 16:59:39 + +1.650.214.aaaa 16:59:41 Zakim, P11 is me 16:59:41 sorry, mdjp, I do not recognize a party named 'P11' 16:59:50 Zakim, ??P11 is me 16:59:50 +mdjp; got it 17:00:25 rtoyg_m has joined #audio 17:00:47 +[IPcaller] 17:00:53 Zakim, IPCaller is me 17:00:53 +padenot; got it 17:00:57 joe has joined #audio 17:01:03 +joe 17:01:05 +Doug_Schepers 17:02:32 +jdsmith 17:02:44 agenda? 17:02:52 jdsmith has joined #audio 17:04:20 zakim, who is here? 17:04:20 On the phone I see mdjp, +1.650.214.aaaa, padenot, joe, Doug_Schepers, jdsmith 17:04:22 On IRC I see jdsmith, joe, rtoyg_m, hongchan, Zakim, RRSAgent, colinbdclark, marcosc, mdjp, slightlyoff, padenot, paul___irish, Domenic, cwilso, rtoyg, shepazu, trackbot 17:04:29 zakim, aaaa is me 17:04:29 +cwilso; got it 17:04:48 zakim, cwilso has hongchan 17:04:48 +hongchan; got it 17:04:59 zakim, cwilso has rtoyg 17:04:59 +rtoyg; got it 17:05:16 Zakim, pick scribe 17:05:16 I don't understand 'pick scribe', mdjp 17:05:20 zakim, pick a victim 17:05:20 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Doug_Schepers 17:05:48 Scribe: hongchan 17:06:18 zakim, take up agendum 1 17:06:18 agendum 1. "Web Audio Conference Session" taken up [from mdjp] 17:06:42 mdjp: Web Audio Conference at IRCAM 17:07:24 mdjp: the idea of having more representation from working group. 17:08:06 http://wac.ircam.fr/ 17:08:37 mdjp: cwilso, padenot and me will be there. 17:09:41 mdjp: we're looking through many papers and they are great examples of user-based outlet. 17:10:07 mdjp: it is beneficial for use to provide support for them as we can. 17:10:57 zakim, take up agendum 2 17:10:57 agendum 2. "Assign open issues which need WG decision to V1 or V.next" taken up [from mdjp] 17:11:10 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/milestones/Needs%20WG%20decision 17:12:51 joe: shall we just walk through this and discuss? 17:13:07 cwilso: https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/373 17:14:10 …: I don't want to replace the buffer source node we already have. 17:14:32 …: we could add another node can be resued. 17:15:25 joe: this should be v.next. 17:16:25 joe: move on to next issue. 17:16:35 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/371 17:18:11 cwilso: this came up while domenic want to rebuild audio element on top of web audio api. 17:18:54 cwilso: it is about expanding features of decodingAPI. 17:19:08 cwilso: this should be v.next. 17:19:56 joe: don't we need some blanket solution? 17:20:28 cwilso, padenot: blanket solution is not appropriate. 17:21:30 joe: next inter-app audio. https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/358 17:21:51 cwilso: defer decision - leave it as needs working group decision. 17:22:16 joe: what are we waiting for? 17:22:38 cwilso: we need some guidance from developers and users. 17:22:53 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/344 17:23:02 padenot: I like this proposal 17:23:14 cwilso: ok 17:23:58 cwilso: I need to rethrough comments but I think we're heading to the same goal. 17:24:55 cwilso: you can say ready for editing 17:25:03 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/337 17:25:24 cwilso: this is the big one, should go to v2. 17:25:33 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/335 17:25:58 padenot: straight forward to spec and doesn't break a thing. 17:26:14 cwilso: this is not possible with promise because it's repeating 17:26:57 it will change the signature in an unfortunate way 17:27:25 joe: we need to know what the signature is when the callback 17:27:52 in general progress + promises should be something like `getPromise(onProgressCallback).then(onSuccess, onFailure)` 17:28:01 but in this case... not good 17:28:14 streams is a better solution IMO for granular decoding 17:29:09 cwilso: I will follow up with domenic and alex to see what the right pattern for this 17:29:26 joe: I'll leave the review tag on it. 17:30:26 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/331 17:30:53 joe: it looks like chris wants to push this 17:30:59 rtoy: works for me 17:31:46 cwilso: I don't think analyzer is good for the process requires precision. 17:31:52 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/323 17:32:01 padenot: it doesn't break anything. 17:32:08 cwilso: you mean creating a new node 17:32:57 cwilso: certainly there are some demands for this. 17:33:26 cwilso: it is easy to implement but the problem is the stability of biquad filter 17:34:38 rtoy: i'd be happy to ignore this stability issue. then it's on developer's hand. 17:34:46 joe: what is the current proposal? 17:35:02 padenot: exposed coef as audioparam 17:35:17 rtoy: k-rate 17:35:27 joe: i'll mark this as v.1 17:35:37 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/302 17:35:58 joe: this is actually more than the progress 17:36:32 joe: changing the content of offline audio context as progress. 17:37:14 joe: my point of view - chair hat off - so you don't have create nodes up front. 17:37:45 cwilso: rendering the hour of audio to get one file is not great. 17:37:56 joe: that's what I think too. 17:38:19 padenot: yeah i might be doable 17:38:58 cwilso: there's is an alignment issue too. 17:39:41 cwilso: it is doable but this is going to be a fairly big undertaking. 17:40:18 joe: the question we should ask is - without it how offline context would be useful. 17:40:31 joe: as developer - offline context needs this to be useful 17:41:02 padenot: I think we can try for v1.. 17:41:06 cwilso: yeah 17:41:26 joe: ok let's try. I will put it in the v1 bracket and we'll see. 17:41:34 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/301 17:42:59 cwilso: resampling is done elsewhere not our problem. 17:43:08 joe: this is v.next 17:43:18 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/296 17:43:19 s/is done elsewhere/might be done elsewhere 17:44:19 cwilso: if you change the playback rate it is hard to calculate the position. 17:44:58 cwilso: we don't have sample accurate hook - so users will be disappointed anyway. 17:45:59 cwilso: it is very good for visual feedback, and also good for making complex changes to playback rate. will make many things easier. (i.e. DJ app) 17:46:50 padenot: yeah I agree 17:49:13 q+ 17:49:31 q- 17:49:31 joe: this goes to v.1 17:49:54 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/264 17:50:49 cwilso: this is about utilizing multiple audio tracks in media elements. 17:52:09 cwilso: adding a new node. not a breaking change. should be in v.1 17:52:40 joe: we need to have a clear way of determining the 'first' track. 17:53:04 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/261 17:53:20 cwilso: this is too late. 17:53:26 padenot: yes, next. 17:53:40 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/255 17:55:17 cwilso: I would say this is appendix for last call. Should keep it in v.1. 17:56:11 cwilso: non-normative description of all nodes. 17:56:26 joe: okay I put that it the proposal and we can revisit later. 17:56:34 https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/248 17:57:12 padenot: this would be useful - will cause big change. 17:57:43 cwilso: I want to do the heavy lifting in the native code rather than the javascript. 17:57:45 cwilso 17:57:57 cwilso: it should be in v.next 17:58:49 agenda? 18:01:50 -cwilso 18:01:53 -jdsmith 18:03:07 -padenot 18:03:09 -Doug_Schepers 18:03:10 -joe 18:03:21 -mdjp 18:03:22 RWC_Audio()12:00PM has ended 18:03:22 Attendees were +1.650.214.aaaa, mdjp, padenot, joe, Doug_Schepers, jdsmith, hongchan, rtoyg 18:04:07 rrsagent, make minutes 18:04:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/11/13-audio-minutes.html mdjp 18:04:13 trackbot, end meeting 18:04:13 Zakim, list attendees 18:04:13 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 18:04:21 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 18:04:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/11/13-audio-minutes.html trackbot 18:04:22 RRSAgent, bye 18:04:22 I see no action items