See also: IRC log
<Lisa_Seeman> agenda: this
<Lisa_Seeman> JohnRochford.a is Lisa_Seeman
<KateDeibel> I'm about to call in
<Lisa_Seeman> scribe: JohnRochford
<Lisa_Seeman> scribe: JohnRochford
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page
Lisa: As soon as gap analysis is ready, post to COGA list.
John: This week, John will add content from Neil to Autism gap analysis, then post to COGA list.
<Lisa_Seeman> ACTION: lisa to bug usergroups not ion list for update [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/07/07-coga-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-18 - Bug usergroups not ion list for update [on Lisa Seeman - due 2014-07-14].
Lisa: I will contact group members about status of each gap analysis.
KateDeibel: I am free this week to "do almost anything".
Neil: I will be conducting
interviews next week with people on the autistic
spectrum.
... The content JohnRochford will be publishing this week
includes info from previous interviews.
Lisa: Because peer reviews will start next week, the sooner the better for publication to the list.
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/track/actions/
<Lisa_Seeman> http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/cognitive/adaptable1.html
<Lisa_Seeman> rich: we need enhacment
<Lisa_Seeman> http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/TechniquesCOGA.html
Rich: List of enhancements for each user group are needed.
<Elle_Waters> (symptoms = needs, which can be contextual?)
Lisa: We are attempting to attribute techniques, by tag, to each user group.
<Elle_Waters> Agree with John
<Lisa_Seeman> http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/cognativefunction.shtml
John: I think we should focus on functional limitation rather than on disability.
<Tim> +1
Lisa: I am awaiting on agreement
for related info in http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/cognativefunction.shtml
... Example - Dyslexia could be broken up into functional
limitations, which would enable targeting of subgroups.
... Gap analyses are by disability because it is a starting
point.
<neilmilliken> I think that we are taking this approach because we are starting with the familiar as a way to break down tasks by things that are recognisable
<neilmilliken> John the limitations (and conversely strengths) will make one almighty matrix which I think will capture this.
Lisa: The next steps for the gap analyses will include a focus on functional limitations, both ones common to all user groups and ones unique to them.
<Elle_Waters> I think that's a good strategy.
Kate: Thinking of functional limitation needs to be mapped to particular disabilities.
Lisa: A more mature draft of the gap analyses will map functional limitation to disability by tags.
<neilmilliken> I agree the tags are the key to connecting common understanding of 'recognised' disabilities to techniques and specific difficulties
Janina: Real-time chat has been
introduced to the HTML-accessibility task force.
... One consideration is evaluating real time chat in terms of
whether or not accessibility troubles are caused by the UI or
by the real-time chat back end, for example.
Neil: Should we consider accessibility requirements for scenarios such as juggling more than one real-time chat at the same time.
John: Such considerations may add an extra layer of complexity we may not want to add to our task force's efforts at this time.
Neil: I agree with John.
Janina: There is a working group for real-time chat.
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page#Gap_Analysis_Issues
Lisa: Do we need tags for particular technologies as well as tags for disabilities?
<Elle_Waters> Apologies, all, I have to drop for another meeting (action item for Elle: complete usability review - scope and terminology - planned meeting with Neil later this week), cheers!
Janina: Maybe the way to capture this is to name a technology as a source for where a concern came from.
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page#Gap_Analysis_Issues
Lisa: If anyone want to review a technology, review the list at https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page#Gap_Analysis_Issues
<KateDeibel> Will do... cannot talk... on second phone call
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: JohnRochford Found Scribe: JohnRochford Inferring ScribeNick: JohnRochford Default Present: +1.508.856.aaaa, JohnRochford, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Lisa_Seeman, +44.203.618.aabb, janina, neilmilliken, Michael_Cooper, KateDeibel Present: +1.508.856.aaaa JohnRochford Rich_Schwerdtfeger Lisa_Seeman +44.203.618.aabb janina neilmilliken Michael_Cooper KateDeibel Regrets: Mary_Jo_Mueller Steve_Lee Debra_Dahl WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting Got date from IRC log name: 07 Jul 2014 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/07/07-coga-minutes.html People with action items: lisa[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]