Share-PSI 2.0 logo

Best Practice: Publish overview of managed data

Draft: 4 April 2016

This version
http://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/bp/pomd-20160404/
Latest version
http://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/bp/pomd/
Previous version
http://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/bp/pomd-20151012/

This is one of a set of Best Practices developed by the Share-PSI 2.0 Thematic Network.

Creative Commons Licence Share-PSI Best Practice: Publish overview of managed data by Share-PSI 2.0 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Outline

When the user community is asked about what datasets they would prefer for release they often cannot respond because they are not aware of what datasets are available. Therefore an overview of datasets managed by an organisation should be published.

Challenge

How to make sure that community is aware of datasets that could be possibly made available as open data?

There is often a ‘catch 22’ situation when identifying data for release. The public sector asks the user community what data they would like and they will prioritise this for release. However, the user community are often not aware of what exists and therefore cannot respond meaningfully.

Solution

Publish an overview of datasets managed by an organisation.

Why is this a Best Practice?

The user community is not always fully aware of datasets that an organisation can possibly make available as open data, at least not to a full extent. This might prevent the community from providing useful feedback about what datasets it would have preferred for release. Following this practice should improve efficiency of gathering feedback about datasets requested for release.

The overview when made public gives enough information for users (both public and private sector) to prioritise the most interesting data for release.

How do I implement this Best Practice?

The technical requirements are minimal. A simple published spreadsheet and a route through which feedback can be sent should be sufficient. The impact of the practice can be improved when the best practice Categorise openness of data is being followed. This allows potential external users to examine the data categorised as yellow (datasets that could be possibly shared within the public sector but not with the external users) and bring forward arguments about why some of it could be re-categorised as ‘green’ data if they see fit.

What do you need for this Best Practice?

The technical requirements are minimal. A simple published spreadsheet and a route through which feedback can be sent should be sufficient. The impact of the practice can be improved when the best practice Categorise openness of data is being followed. This allows potential external users to examine the data categorised as yellow (datasets that could be possibly shared within the public sector but not with the external users) and bring forward arguments about why some of it could be re-categorised as ‘green’ data if they see fit.

Where has this best practice been implemented?

Country Implementation Contact Point

References

Contact Info

Heather Broomfield, Difi (Norway).

$Id: Overview.html,v 1.5 2016/08/20 06:58:52 phila Exp $