None.
13:57:38 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/01-sparql-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/01-sparql-irc ←
13:57:40 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
13:57:42 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277 ←
13:57:42 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes ←
13:57:43 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
13:57:43 <trackbot> Date: 01 November 2011
13:57:47 <LeeF> zakim, this will be SPARQL
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, this will be SPARQL ←
13:57:47 <Zakim> ok, LeeF; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, LeeF; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes ←
13:58:12 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started ←
13:58:19 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:58:27 <AndyS> zakim, IPCaller is me
Andy Seaborne: zakim, IPCaller is me ←
13:58:27 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←
13:58:47 <AndyS> sandro? The WG resolved to publish two docs (overview as WD, fed query as LC) 2 weeks ago - do you have everything you need?
Andy Seaborne: sandro? The WG resolved to publish two docs (overview as WD, fed query as LC) 2 weeks ago - do you have everything you need? ←
13:59:08 <Zakim> +??P1
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P1 ←
13:59:18 <cbuilara> zakim, ??P1 is me
Carlos Buil Aranda: zakim, ??P1 is me ←
13:59:18 <Zakim> +cbuilara; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +cbuilara; got it ←
13:59:42 <kasei> Zakim telling me the passcode is invalid...
Gregory Williams: Zakim telling me the passcode is invalid... ←
14:00:12 <Zakim> +Lee_Feigenbaum
Zakim IRC Bot: +Lee_Feigenbaum ←
14:00:20 <LeeF> zakim, Lee_Feigenbaum is LeeF
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, Lee_Feigenbaum is LeeF ←
14:00:20 <Zakim> +LeeF; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +LeeF; got it ←
14:00:31 <Zakim> +??P2
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P2 ←
14:00:35 <swh> Zakim, ??P2 is me
Steve Harris: Zakim, ??P2 is me ←
14:00:35 <Zakim> +swh; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +swh; got it ←
14:00:49 <LeeF> swh, do you mind scribing?
Lee Feigenbaum: swh, do you mind scribing? ←
14:01:00 <Zakim> +sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +sandro ←
14:01:11 <LeeF> Regrets: Axel, pgearon, chimezie
14:01:16 <kasei> curse you, Zakim!
Gregory Williams: curse you, Zakim! ←
14:01:22 <LeeF> keep trying, kasei :D
Lee Feigenbaum: keep trying, kasei :D ←
14:01:25 <Zakim> +MattPerry
Zakim IRC Bot: +MattPerry ←
14:01:30 <kasei> Zakim, what is the code?
Gregory Williams: Zakim, what is the code? ←
14:01:30 <Zakim> the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), kasei
Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), kasei ←
14:01:35 <kasei> :|
Gregory Williams: :| ←
14:01:48 <MattPerry> yes
Matthew Perry: yes ←
14:01:53 <kasei> LeeF: is there reason to think it will randomly start working at some point?
Lee Feigenbaum: is there reason to think it will randomly start working at some point? [ Scribe Assist by Gregory Williams ] ←
14:02:00 <Zakim> +kasei
Zakim IRC Bot: +kasei ←
14:02:03 <kasei> wtf
Gregory Williams: wtf ←
14:02:04 <LeeF> kasei: past experience
Gregory Williams: past experience [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
14:02:07 <LeeF> kasei: :-)
Gregory Williams: :-) [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
14:02:13 <sandro> AndyS, give or take pubrules corrections, I think so.
Sandro Hawke: AndyS, give or take pubrules corrections, I think so. ←
14:02:47 <AndyS> sandro - great - just making sure we haven't forgotten something that's a block on process
Andy Seaborne: sandro - great - just making sure we haven't forgotten something that's a block on process ←
14:03:07 <LeeF> Scribe: swh
(Scribe set to Steve Harris)
14:03:27 <swh> scribenick: swh
14:03:50 <Zakim> +??P8
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P8 ←
14:03:59 <swh> LeeF: want to make progress on…?
Lee Feigenbaum: want to make progress on…? ←
14:04:02 <bglimm> Zakim, +??P8 is me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, +??P8 is me ←
14:04:02 <Zakim> sorry, bglimm, I do not recognize a party named '+??P8'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, bglimm, I do not recognize a party named '+??P8' ←
14:04:07 <LeeF> zakim, who's speaking?
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, who's speaking? ←
14:04:15 <bglimm> Zakim, ??P8 is me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, ??P8 is me ←
14:04:15 <Zakim> +bglimm; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm; got it ←
14:04:18 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
14:04:18 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:04:20 <Zakim> LeeF, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: LeeF (73%), ??P8 (73%)
Zakim IRC Bot: LeeF, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: LeeF (73%), ??P8 (73%) ←
14:04:26 <bglimm> Yes, that's me
Birte Glimm: Yes, that's me ←
14:04:35 <swh> … comments
… comments ←
14:04:42 <swh> … including making sure they're all assigned
… including making sure they're all assigned ←
14:04:43 <Zakim> + +3539149aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +3539149aaaa ←
14:04:51 <alexpassant> Zakim, +3539149aaaa is me
Alexandre Passant: Zakim, +3539149aaaa is me ←
14:04:51 <Zakim> +alexpassant; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +alexpassant; got it ←
14:05:07 <swh> … need to close out all comments we haven't closed, prepare documents of 2LC
… need to close out all comments we haven't closed, prepare documents of 2LC ←
14:05:20 <swh> … before comments in detail
… before comments in detail ←
14:05:30 <swh> … anybody as ISWC, anything to report?
… anybody as ISWC, anything to report? ←
14:05:35 <AndyS> q+
Andy Seaborne: q+ ←
14:05:49 <LeeF> ack AndyS
Lee Feigenbaum: ack AndyS ←
14:06:12 <swh> AndyS: at ISWC there was a lot of SPARQL, managed to go to a query related session every time, federated, efficiency, extraction work etc. based on SPARQL
Andy Seaborne: at ISWC there was a lot of SPARQL, managed to go to a query related session every time, federated, efficiency, extraction work etc. based on SPARQL ←
14:06:16 <swh> … quite a lot of SPARQL 1.1
… quite a lot of SPARQL 1.1 ←
14:06:28 <swh> LeeF: any general sentiment about 1.1?
Lee Feigenbaum: any general sentiment about 1.1? ←
14:06:49 <swh> AndyS: felt like it was accepted, people are using it now
Andy Seaborne: felt like it was accepted, people are using it now ←
14:06:52 <swh> … expecting it to happen
… expecting it to happen ←
14:07:04 <swh> LeeF: good, meshes well with what I've heard
Lee Feigenbaum: good, meshes well with what I've heard ←
14:07:05 <bglimm> I agree with Andy, SPARQL 1.1 is used and I didn't here real criticism
Birte Glimm: I agree with Andy, SPARQL 1.1 is used and I didn't hear real criticism ←
14:07:32 <swh> LeeF: ought to help with implementation report
Lee Feigenbaum: ought to help with implementation report ←
14:07:33 <LeeF> topic: schedule
14:07:36 <bglimm> s/here/hear/
14:07:53 <swh> LeeF: axel put forward a tentative schedule for next few weeks
Lee Feigenbaum: axel put forward a tentative schedule for next few weeks ←
14:08:16 <swh> … milestones - 22nd nov telecon, begin approving 2LC versions
… milestones - 22nd nov telecon, begin approving 2LC versions ←
14:08:21 <swh> … finish off on 29th
… finish off on 29th ←
14:08:33 <swh> … not a lot of changes need to be made
… not a lot of changes need to be made ←
14:08:45 <swh> … will need to line up reviewers
… will need to line up reviewers ←
14:09:07 <swh> … will talk to editors to make sure everything is lined up
… will talk to editors to make sure everything is lined up ←
14:09:14 <swh> … need to make sure we've looked at all the comments
… need to make sure we've looked at all the comments ←
14:10:14 <AndyS> Oi! JSON results is rec track - that's the point!
Andy Seaborne: Oi! JSON results is rec track - that's the point! ←
14:10:23 <swh> … goal to start on tests suite, Impl reports in new year
… goal to start on tests suite, Impl reports in new year ←
14:10:39 <swh> … leave us with 1.1 reqs by end of june
… leave us with 1.1 reqs by end of june ←
14:11:09 <swh> … substantive questions about JSON res format
… substantive questions about JSON res format ←
14:11:29 <swh> … one of the things we've heard is that W3C is less likely than they have been to extend charters
… one of the things we've heard is that W3C is less likely than they have been to extend charters ←
14:11:47 <swh> … group may not get extension without aggressive work
… group may not get extension without aggressive work ←
14:12:19 <swh> sandro: I've heard that there's a change in the level of concern [about extensions]
Sandro Hawke: I've heard that there's a change in the level of concern [about extensions] ←
14:12:23 <swh> … I wouldn't really worry about it
… I wouldn't really worry about it ←
14:12:30 <swh> … as long as the grp is active it should be ok
… as long as the grp is active it should be ok ←
14:13:03 <swh> LeeF: it's not formal policy, we're all going to lose steam, so should push ahead
Lee Feigenbaum: it's not formal policy, we're all going to lose steam, so should push ahead ←
14:13:22 <swh> … will email schedule to list later today
… will email schedule to list later today ←
14:13:40 <LeeF> topic: Comments
14:13:52 <LeeF> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
Lee Feigenbaum: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments ←
14:14:29 <swh> LeeF: will reach out to editors not on call with comments assigned to them
Lee Feigenbaum: will reach out to editors not on call with comments assigned to them ←
14:14:37 <swh> … maybe finish some off
… maybe finish some off ←
14:15:06 <swh> … comment on bnode ordering
… comment on bnode ordering ←
14:15:15 <swh> … AndyS, you tied that with some other comments
… AndyS, you tied that with some other comments ←
14:15:21 <swh> AndyS: I can deal with that
Andy Seaborne: I can deal with that ←
14:16:01 <swh> … related to something by David Booth, I would punt to RDFWG, skolemisation
… related to something by David Booth, I would punt to RDFWG, skolemisation ←
14:16:14 <swh> … not keen on making changes
… not keen on making changes ←
14:16:41 <swh> LeeF: we don't have enough underlying mechanisms to define that ourselves
Lee Feigenbaum: we don't have enough underlying mechanisms to define that ourselves ←
14:17:17 <swh> LB-8
LB-8 ←
14:17:20 <swh> JB-8
JB-8 ←
14:17:28 <swh> kasei: work done, needs writing up
Gregory Williams: work done, needs writing up ←
14:17:38 <swh> .. it's fixed
.. it's fixed ←
14:17:50 <swh> DB-11/a
DB-11/a ←
14:18:14 <swh> AndyS: I took it to be a question, not a comment
Andy Seaborne: I took it to be a question, not a comment ←
14:19:00 <swh> … if there's an easy way to address I don't mind doing it, but the spec is not a tutorial
… if there's an easy way to address I don't mind doing it, but the spec is not a tutorial ←
14:19:15 <swh> … as long as the tech details are right, lets keep moving forwards
… as long as the tech details are right, lets keep moving forwards ←
14:19:23 <swh> LeeF: do we have a test case that illustrates this
Lee Feigenbaum: do we have a test case that illustrates this ←
14:19:27 <swh> AndyS: don't know
Andy Seaborne: don't know ←
14:19:47 <swh> LeeF: if we make a promise to include a test case to highlight scoping, that seems more appropriate
Lee Feigenbaum: if we make a promise to include a test case to highlight scoping, that seems more appropriate ←
14:20:07 <swh> AndyS: I'll see if there's a test case, and put one in if not
Andy Seaborne: I'll see if there's a test case, and put one in if not ←
14:20:41 <swh> DB-15 - editorial
DB-15 - editorial ←
14:20:49 <swh> LeeF: Andy or Steve, one of you like to handle that
Lee Feigenbaum: Andy or Steve, one of you like to handle that ←
14:21:11 <swh> AndyS: I'll do it, but it's a SPARQL 1.0 point, hasn't been revisited
Andy Seaborne: I'll do it, but it's a SPARQL 1.0 point, hasn't been revisited ←
14:21:54 <swh> DaveB - output rows are a bad idea[?]
DaveB - output rows are a bad idea[?] ←
14:22:10 <swh> LeeF: I thought i saw some discussion
Lee Feigenbaum: I thought i saw some discussion ←
14:22:20 <swh> kasei: the test case he's talking about is perverse
Gregory Williams: the test case he's talking about is perverse ←
14:22:27 <swh> … the issue is nonsensical
… the issue is nonsensical ←
14:22:40 <swh> … doesn't align with his system, but the semantics are not in question
… doesn't align with his system, but the semantics are not in question ←
14:22:58 <swh> … not sure he'd agree with that, but I don;t think there's any fundamental problem
… not sure he'd agree with that, but I don;t think there's any fundamental problem ←
14:23:17 <swh> AndyS: I've removed this test case from the manifest
Andy Seaborne: I've removed this test case from the manifest ←
14:24:08 <swh> kasei: it could come up in the future, but it's a weird way to write tests
Gregory Williams: it could come up in the future, but it's a weird way to write tests ←
14:25:01 <swh> LeeF drafting response to this comment
LeeF drafting response to this comment ←
14:26:07 <swh> DB-14 [?]
DB-14 [?] ←
14:26:21 <swh> LeeF: I'm going to put AndyS's name on this, similar situation to the other
Lee Feigenbaum: I'm going to put AndyS's name on this, similar situation to the other ←
14:26:47 <AndyS> SHA224 tests removal done.
Andy Seaborne: SHA224 tests removal done. ←
14:28:12 <swh> LeeF: there's some responses that haven't been ACKd, so we'll send some 2nd notices for LC comments that we're going to close them
Lee Feigenbaum: there's some responses that haven't been ACKd, so we'll send some 2nd notices for LC comments that we're going to close them ←
14:28:35 <swh> DB-12
DB-12 ←
14:28:51 <swh> LeeF: has axel sent that message?
Lee Feigenbaum: has axel sent that message? ←
14:29:17 <swh> … I don't see a message from axel, our response is "yes, that's fine"
… I don't see a message from axel, our response is "yes, that's fine" ←
14:29:26 <swh> … sending now
… sending now ←
14:30:28 <swh> DB-11
DB-11 ←
14:30:35 <swh> AndyS has sent a response
AndyS has sent a response ←
14:31:09 <swh> DB-10 - close
DB-10 - close ←
14:33:37 <swh> BT-2,3
BT-2,3 ←
14:33:46 <swh> swh: will take a look at them
Steve Harris: will take a look at them ←
14:34:12 <swh> DB-7
DB-7 ←
14:34:40 <swh> kasei: needs a few words added to draft
Gregory Williams: needs a few words added to draft ←
14:34:45 <swh> RC-4
RC-4 ←
14:35:04 <swh> LeeF: looking at draft, we had a WG decision needed
Lee Feigenbaum: looking at draft, we had a WG decision needed ←
14:35:14 <swh> … I'm not swapped in on it
… I'm not swapped in on it ←
14:35:21 <LeeF> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RC-4
Lee Feigenbaum: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RC-4 ←
14:35:49 <swh> AndyS: asked for help from Paul last week (c.f. DB-4)
Andy Seaborne: asked for help from Paul last week (c.f. DB-4) ←
14:36:04 <swh> … we need to make a decision, red box in LC doc
… we need to make a decision, red box in LC doc ←
14:36:27 <swh> … email on list a few weeks ago
… email on list a few weeks ago ←
14:36:39 <swh> LeeF: we ought to put a proposal on next weeks agenda
Lee Feigenbaum: we ought to put a proposal on next weeks agenda ←
14:37:27 <swh> AndyS: my inclination is that the RDF WG will do the other thing, so we should do what they do
Andy Seaborne: my inclination is that the RDF WG will do the other thing, so we should do what they do ←
14:37:48 <swh> … don't want to do the more radical thing that eric is proposing
… don't want to do the more radical thing that eric is proposing ←
14:37:59 <swh> JB-7
JB-7 ←
14:38:11 <swh> LeeF: response needs WG discussion
Lee Feigenbaum: response needs WG discussion ←
14:38:17 <swh> … ready to go
… ready to go ←
14:38:25 <swh> MS-7
MS-7 ←
14:38:26 <bglimm> I'll handle that
Birte Glimm: I'll handle that ←
14:38:37 <bglimm> It's mainly clarifying an open question I had
Birte Glimm: It's mainly clarifying an open question I had ←
14:38:51 <swh> DB-6
DB-6 ←
14:38:54 <bglimm> We had an editor's note in the document
Birte Glimm: We had an editor's note in the document ←
14:39:08 <swh> kasei: everyone signed off on it yesterday
Gregory Williams: everyone signed off on it yesterday ←
14:39:15 <swh> DB-5 - for Paul
DB-5 - for Paul ←
14:39:36 <bglimm> MS-2 to MS-5 could be approved
Birte Glimm: MS-2 to MS-5 could be approved ←
14:39:41 <swh> MS-2..6
MS-2..6 ←
14:39:48 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:39:48 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should no longer be muted ←
14:40:03 <swh> bglimm: I have to work on MS-6, but 2..5 could be sent
Birte Glimm: I have to work on MS-6, but 2..5 could be sent ←
14:40:16 <LeeF> zakim, mute bglimm
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, mute bglimm ←
14:40:16 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:40:32 <swh> LeeF: will mark 2-5 is responded, 6 open
Lee Feigenbaum: will mark 2-5 is responded, 6 open ←
14:42:41 <swh> XSLT change [?]
XSLT change [?] ←
14:42:56 <swh> kasei: not part of the document, so we can change it
Gregory Williams: not part of the document, so we can change it ←
14:44:34 <swh> LeeF: one live perf change to XSLT doc, would like to change it
Lee Feigenbaum: one line perf change to XSLT doc, would like to change it ←
14:44:45 <swh> s/one live/one line/
14:44:47 <LeeF> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/result-to-html.xsl
Lee Feigenbaum: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/result-to-html.xsl ←
14:45:06 <swh> sandro: we're not supposed to change anything under /TR
Sandro Hawke: we're not supposed to change anything under /TR ←
14:45:22 <swh> … if there's a good enough reason we could do
… if there's a good enough reason we could do ←
14:45:29 <swh> LeeF: I don't think it's a good enough reason
Lee Feigenbaum: I don't think it's a good enough reason ←
14:45:54 <swh> AndyS: I've had the same report from someone else
Andy Seaborne: I've had the same report from someone else ←
14:46:24 <swh> sandro: I'll forward this to the person who might be able to make the change
Sandro Hawke: I'll forward this to the person who might be able to make the change ←
14:46:27 <LeeF> ACTION: Sandro to forward http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0007 to the person who would make an exception to making the change in TR space
ACTION: Sandro to forward http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0007 to the person who would make an exception to making the change in TR space ←
14:46:27 <trackbot> Created ACTION-544 - Forward http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0007 to the person who would make an exception to making the change in TR space [on Sandro Hawke - due 2011-11-08].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-544 - Forward http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0007 to the person who would make an exception to making the change in TR space [on Sandro Hawke - due 2011-11-08]. ←
14:47:19 <AndyS> We've done this
Andy Seaborne: We've done this ←
14:47:26 <swh> re. CONSTRUCT WHERE
re. CONSTRUCT WHERE ←
14:47:51 <swh> LeeF: we're going to decline to do anything additional
Lee Feigenbaum: we're going to decline to do anything additional ←
14:48:12 <swh> … could possibly be standardised in the future
… could possibly be standardised in the future ←
14:48:35 <swh> AL-1
AL-1 ←
14:48:43 <swh> HTTP protocol
HTTP protocol ←
14:48:52 <swh> LeeF: will contact chime about that
Lee Feigenbaum: will contact chime about that ←
14:49:27 <swh> IM-1, CB-3 - for chime
IM-1, CB-3 - for chime ←
14:49:51 <swh> LC comments done
LC comments done ←
14:50:13 <swh> Pre-LC comments
Pre-LC comments ←
14:50:39 <sandro> q+
Sandro Hawke: q+ ←
14:51:03 <swh> RC-1,2 - LeeF will look at
RC-1,2 - LeeF will look at ←
14:51:24 <swh> DBeckett-1 - has a draft
DBeckett-1 - has a draft ←
14:51:34 <swh> from carlos?
from carlos? ←
14:51:57 <swh> cbuilara: I forgot to close the issue
Carlos Buil Aranda: I forgot to close the issue ←
14:52:07 <swh> … I will check and close
… I will check and close ←
14:52:43 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?
Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:52:43 <Zakim> On the phone I see AndyS, cbuilara, LeeF, swh, sandro, MattPerry, kasei, bglimm (muted), alexpassant
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see AndyS, cbuilara, LeeF, swh, sandro, MattPerry, kasei, bglimm (muted), alexpassant ←
14:54:13 <swh> FS-1 [?]
FS-1 [?] ←
14:54:23 <swh> cbuilara: I think I sent a response
Carlos Buil Aranda: I think I sent a response ←
14:55:29 <LeeF> q?
Lee Feigenbaum: q? ←
14:55:39 <LeeF> ack sandro
Lee Feigenbaum: ack sandro ←
14:56:01 <swh> sandro: followup q. on action, maybe put a redirect from /TR to WG space, where we can control it?
Sandro Hawke: followup q. on action, maybe put a redirect from /TR to WG space, where we can control it? ←
14:56:12 <swh> … would that break anything
… would that break anything ←
14:56:15 <swh> AndyS: no
Andy Seaborne: no ←
14:56:20 <swh> sandro: I'll propose that
Sandro Hawke: I'll propose that ←
14:56:29 <sandro> Can we redirect http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/result-to-html.xsl to WG space.
Sandro Hawke: Can we redirect http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/result-to-html.xsl to WG space. ←
14:57:38 <swh> AndyS: I'll sort into things that have to be done, and things that should be done
Andy Seaborne: I'll sort into things that have to be done, and things that should be done ←
14:57:46 <swh> LeeF: I can help write responses if you like
Lee Feigenbaum: I can help write responses if you like ←
14:58:13 <swh> … I see 4 open ones next to you + [something]
… I see 4 open ones next to you + [something] ←
14:58:20 <swh> … most of them can be dispatched easily
… most of them can be dispatched easily ←
14:58:38 <swh> … ones in LC table that are yours are taken care of
… ones in LC table that are yours are taken care of ←
14:58:53 <swh> … I don't think it's that bad
… I don't think it's that bad ←
14:59:16 <swh> … AOB?
… AOB? ←
14:59:44 <LeeF> http://www.w3.org/2009/CommonScribe/panel/
Lee Feigenbaum: http://www.w3.org/2009/CommonScribe/panel/ ←
15:00:04 <bglimm> RRSAgent, make logs world
Birte Glimm: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
15:00:09 <Zakim> -alexpassant
Zakim IRC Bot: -alexpassant ←
15:00:11 <Zakim> -LeeF
Zakim IRC Bot: -LeeF ←
15:00:11 <MattPerry> bye
Matthew Perry: bye ←
15:00:16 <Zakim> -swh
Zakim IRC Bot: -swh ←
15:00:17 <Zakim> -sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -sandro ←
15:00:18 <Zakim> -MattPerry
Zakim IRC Bot: -MattPerry ←
Formatted by CommonScribe