edit

Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 13 September 2012

Agenda
http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20120913
Seen
Bernadette Hyland, Boris Villazón-Terrazas, Deirdre Lee, George Thomas, Gerald Steeman, Hadley Beeman, John Erickson, Phil Archer, Richard Cyganiak, Sandro Hawke, Yigal Arens
Scribe
John Erickson
IRC Log
Original
Resolutions
  1. The vocabulary known as Business Core Vocabulary is now being changed to the "Legal Entity Vocabulary" link
  2. The namespace previously known as /ns/legal shall be moved to /ns/legal-entity link
Topics
14:00:00 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/09/13-gld-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/09/13-gld-irc

14:00:02 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world

14:00:04 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be GLD

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be GLD

14:00:04 <Zakim> ok, trackbot, I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM already started

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot, I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM already started

14:00:05 <trackbot> Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference
14:00:06 <trackbot> Date: 13 September 2012
14:02:20 <Zakim> + +1.757.604.aaaa

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.757.604.aaaa

14:02:29 <Zakim> + +3539149aabb

Zakim IRC Bot: + +3539149aabb

14:03:00 <George> zakim who is here?

George Thomas: zakim who is here?

14:03:21 <George> zakim, who is here?

George Thomas: zakim, who is here?

14:03:26 <Zakim> +??P29

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P29

14:03:35 <Zakim> On the phone I see Sandro, George_Thomas, +1.757.604.aaaa, +3539149aabb, ??P29

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Sandro, George_Thomas, +1.757.604.aaaa, +3539149aabb, ??P29

14:03:36 <olyerickson> Zakim, ??P29 is me.

John Erickson: Zakim, ??P29 is me.

14:03:43 <DeirdreLee> zakim, +3539149aabb is me

Deirdre Lee: zakim, +3539149aabb is me

14:03:50 <Zakim> On IRC I see bhyland, GeraldSteeman, mhausenblas, olyerickson, Zakim, RRSAgent, DeirdreLee, George, MacTed, danbri_, cygri, trackbot, sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see bhyland, GeraldSteeman, mhausenblas, olyerickson, Zakim, RRSAgent, DeirdreLee, George, MacTed, danbri_, cygri, trackbot, sandro

14:03:56 <Zakim> +olyerickson; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +olyerickson; got it

14:03:59 <GeraldSteeman> zakim, aaaa is me.

Gerald Steeman: zakim, aaaa is me.

14:04:06 <Zakim> +DeirdreLee; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +DeirdreLee; got it

14:04:12 <olyerickson> Zaim, who is on the phone?

John Erickson: Zaim, who is on the phone?

14:04:17 <Zakim> +GeraldSteeman; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +GeraldSteeman; got it

14:04:29 <George> zakim, who is here?

George Thomas: zakim, who is here?

14:04:31 <Zakim> +bhyland

Zakim IRC Bot: +bhyland

14:04:47 <Zakim> On the phone I see Sandro, George_Thomas, GeraldSteeman, DeirdreLee, olyerickson, bhyland

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Sandro, George_Thomas, GeraldSteeman, DeirdreLee, olyerickson, bhyland

14:05:12 <Zakim> On IRC I see bhyland, GeraldSteeman, mhausenblas, olyerickson, Zakim, RRSAgent, DeirdreLee, George, MacTed, danbri_, cygri, trackbot, sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see bhyland, GeraldSteeman, mhausenblas, olyerickson, Zakim, RRSAgent, DeirdreLee, George, MacTed, danbri_, cygri, trackbot, sandro

14:05:53 <olyerickson> I'll scribe

John Erickson: I'll scribe

14:05:56 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller]

14:06:06 <PhilA2> zakim, IPCaller is me

Phil Archer: zakim, IPCaller is me

14:06:06 <Zakim> +PhilA2; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +PhilA2; got it

14:06:10 <olyerickson> Scribe: olyerickson

(Scribe set to John Erickson)

14:06:22 <bhyland> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20120913
14:06:30 <olyerickson> Topic: Minutes

1. Minutes

14:06:35 <bhyland> Minutes for last week: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-09-06

Bernadette Hyland: Minutes for last week: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-09-06

14:06:38 <bhyland> +1

Bernadette Hyland: +1

14:07:00 <PhilA2> Propose accept minutes of last week http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-09-06

Phil Archer: Propose accept minutes of last week http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-09-06

14:07:19 <olyerickson> bhyland: Note resolution was added last week

Bernadette Hyland: Note resolution was added last week

14:07:31 <olyerickson> PhilA2: confirms resolution (near end)

Phil Archer: confirms resolution (near end)

14:07:41 <olyerickson> * note "+1s" at end

* note "+1s" at end

14:08:02 <olyerickson> PhilA2 to edit to note resolution

PhilA2 to edit to note resolution

14:08:32 <olyerickson> bhyland: add to agenda discussion of "Business Core Vocabulary"

Bernadette Hyland: add to agenda discussion of "Business Core Vocabulary"

14:08:47 <olyerickson> Topic: Agenda items for this call

2. Agenda items for this call

14:08:56 <olyerickson> "Business Core Vocabulary" (PhilA2 & bhyland request)

"Business Core Vocabulary" (PhilA2 & bhyland request)

14:09:04 <olyerickson> Deliverable adjustments (George)

Deliverable adjustments (George)

14:09:19 <bhyland> Agenda+ Feedback on ADMS Business Vocabulary feedback (has to do with suggestions to move to legal-entity)

Bernadette Hyland: Agenda+ Feedback on ADMS Business Vocabulary feedback (has to do with suggestions to move to legal-entity)

14:09:34 <olyerickson> George: Would like to talk vocab but are thin on attendance (edits)

George Thomas: Would like to talk vocab but are thin on attendance (edits)

14:09:53 <olyerickson> PhilA2: Request to continue conformance discussion

Phil Archer: Request to continue conformance discussion

14:11:01 <olyerickson> Topic: Conformance Issue (PhilA2)

3. Conformance Issue (PhilA2)

14:11:09 <olyerickson> Recall discussion with Rufus

Recall discussion with Rufus

14:11:18 <olyerickson> Two key aspects:

Two key aspects:

14:11:19 <bhyland> Agenda+ Modifications to Main GLD wiki page under "Deliverables" (has to do with geography & spatial information)

Bernadette Hyland: Agenda+ Modifications to Main GLD wiki page under "Deliverables" (has to do with geography & spatial information)

14:11:34 <PhilA2> Take a look at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/legal/index.html#conformance

Phil Archer: Take a look at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/legal/index.html#conformance

14:11:49 <olyerickson> * Double-check that what we agreed with Rufus is correct; see above editor's draft

* Double-check that what we agreed with Rufus is correct; see above editor's draft

14:12:11 <olyerickson> * The point: includes text that captures what we discussed w/ Rufus

* The point: includes text that captures what we discussed w/ Rufus

14:12:20 <olyerickson> "What does it mean to conform to a vocab"

"What does it mean to conform to a vocab"

14:12:35 <olyerickson> * In the "open world" paradigm, very hard to think about 'conformance'

* In the "open world" paradigm, very hard to think about 'conformance'

14:12:49 <olyerickson> * If everything is optional, how to measure conformance

* If everything is optional, how to measure conformance

14:13:09 <olyerickson> * Conformance isn't about using everything

* Conformance isn't about using everything

14:13:12 <bhyland> PhilA reviewed language: "Conformance to this vocabulary means using its classes, properties and relationships to describe businesses. It does not necessarily mean using every term and there are no terms that are mandatory. However, the inclusion of a term signals that the Working Group has found it to be useful. Applications may specify a minimum set of terms that publishers must use if their data is to be processed, and may also specify controlled vocabularies

Bernadette Hyland: PhilA reviewed language: "Conformance to this vocabulary means using its classes, properties and relationships to describe businesses. It does not necessarily mean using every term and there are no terms that are mandatory. However, the inclusion of a term signals that the Working Group has found it to be useful. Applications may specify a minimum set of terms that publishers must use if their data is to be processed, and may also specify controlled vocabularies

14:13:51 <olyerickson> Applications MAY specify req'd usage. Vocab itself doesn't specify requirements for compliant usage

Applications MAY specify req'd usage. Vocab itself doesn't specify requirements for compliant usage

14:14:14 <olyerickson> * WG GLD may e.g. recognize cardinality constraints often important

* WG GLD may e.g. recognize cardinality constraints often important

14:14:57 <olyerickson> bhyland: What specifically was changed? What's different?

Bernadette Hyland: What specifically was changed? What's different?

14:15:02 <sandro> +1 to this approach, and it's what we talked about

Sandro Hawke: +1 to this approach, and it's what we talked about

14:15:05 <George> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/legal/index.html#conformance

George Thomas: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/legal/index.html#conformance

14:15:13 <George> Conformance to this vocabulary means using its classes, properties and relationships to describe businesses. It does not necessarily mean using every term and there are no terms that are mandatory. However, the inclusion of a term signals that the Working Group has found it to be useful. Applications may specify a minimum set of terms that publishers must use if their data is to be processed, and may also specify controlled vocabularies as acceptable values for p

George Thomas: Conformance to this vocabulary means using its classes, properties and relationships to describe businesses. It does not necessarily mean using every term and there are no terms that are mandatory. However, the inclusion of a term signals that the Working Group has found it to be useful. Applications may specify a minimum set of terms that publishers must use if their data is to be processed, and may also specify controlled vocabularies as acceptable values for p

14:15:27 <olyerickson> PhilA2: The (conformance) text is new; added to (he thinks) Editors' Draft

Phil Archer: The (conformance) text is new; added to (he thinks) Editors' Draft

14:16:00 <olyerickson> bhyland: Some of the bullets are boilerplate

Bernadette Hyland: Some of the bullets are boilerplate

14:16:06 <PhilA2> Current ed draft oif DCAT http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/dcat/index.html

Phil Archer: Current ed draft oif DCAT http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/dcat/index.html

14:16:09 <Zakim> +??P37

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P37

14:16:22 <Yigal> zakim, ??p37 is me

Yigal Arens: zakim, ??p37 is me

14:16:22 <Zakim> +Yigal; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +Yigal; got it

14:16:45 <olyerickson> PhilA2; Current Editors' Draft of DCAT doesn't have more "robust" language. Neither does Data Cube, neither does Org

PhilA2; Current Editors' Draft of DCAT doesn't have more "robust" language. Neither does Data Cube, neither does Org

14:16:56 <olyerickson> (last bit was bhyland)

(last bit was bhyland)

14:17:24 <olyerickson> * PhilA2: Rufus did not like some of the language; refer to public comments

* PhilA2: Rufus did not like some of the language; refer to public comments

14:17:48 <olyerickson> * bhyland: PhilA2's draft is paragraph, not bullets (problem)

* bhyland: PhilA2's draft is paragraph, not bullets (problem)

14:18:02 <olyerickson> * bhyland: Wording "wishy-washy"

* bhyland: Wording "wishy-washy"

14:18:19 <olyerickson> * bhyland: Say what you mean, directly...

* bhyland: Say what you mean, directly...

14:18:31 <Zakim> + +1.440.389.aacc

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.440.389.aacc

14:18:36 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, aacc is me

Hadley Beeman: zakim, aacc is me

14:18:36 <Zakim> +HadleyBeeman; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +HadleyBeeman; got it

14:18:44 <olyerickson> George: Well, GLD draft does say conformance will be "application specific"

George Thomas: Well, GLD draft does say conformance will be "application specific"

14:18:57 <Zakim> + +34.60.062.aadd

Zakim IRC Bot: + +34.60.062.aadd

14:19:23 <olyerickson> * bhyland: Would rather be definite on minimum set

* bhyland: Would rather be definite on minimum set

14:20:27 <olyerickson> George; PhilA2 has captured what would make Rufus happy

George; PhilA2 has captured what would make Rufus happy

14:20:40 <boris> zakim, aadd is me

Boris Villazón-Terrazas: zakim, aadd is me

14:20:40 <Zakim> +boris; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +boris; got it

14:20:48 <olyerickson> * bhyland: Needs bullets, better for International readers

* bhyland: Needs bullets, better for International readers

14:20:50 <boris> zakim, mute me

Boris Villazón-Terrazas: zakim, mute me

14:20:50 <Zakim> boris should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: boris should now be muted

14:21:11 <olyerickson> * bhyland: Needs more direct language, current is wishy-washy

* bhyland: Needs more direct language, current is wishy-washy

14:21:44 <olyerickson> * bhyland: better: "applications must satisfy minimum set of terms"

* bhyland: better: "applications must satisfy minimum set of terms"

14:22:08 <bhyland> We are talking about http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/legal/index.html#conformance

Bernadette Hyland: We are talking about http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/legal/index.html#conformance

14:22:15 <HadleyBeeman> thanks, bhyland.

Hadley Beeman: thanks, bhyland.

14:22:33 <olyerickson> PhilA2: There is a difference between conforming to vocab vs conforming to application (such as meeting LOD Cloud requirements)

Phil Archer: There is a difference between conforming to vocab vs conforming to application (such as meeting LOD Cloud requirements)

14:22:33 <bhyland> * has added some language beyond the boilerplate Conformance section and we're discussing it.

Bernadette Hyland: * has added some language beyond the boilerplate Conformance section and we're discussing it.

14:23:08 <PhilA2> olyerickson: It's not the vocab designers' brief to design the specify the requirements for getting into the application

John Erickson: It's not the vocab designers' brief to design the specify the requirements for getting into the application [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ]

14:23:16 <bhyland> q+

Bernadette Hyland: q+

14:23:58 <olyerickson> * George: Notion of standard is diluted if anyone can use it in any way they see fit. But that's the deal

* George: Notion of standard is diluted if anyone can use it in any way they see fit. But that's the deal

14:24:24 <olyerickson> * sandro: We don't know what the applications will be/need. So hard to talk about it

* sandro: We don't know what the applications will be/need. So hard to talk about it

14:24:27 <PhilA2> * Example: CKAN is an application that will define mandatory fields

Phil Archer: * Example: CKAN is an application that will define mandatory fields

14:24:36 <PhilA2> * Example: EU's Joinup platform will do this for ADMS

Phil Archer: * Example: EU's Joinup platform will do this for ADMS

14:24:40 <bhyland> +1

Bernadette Hyland: +1

14:24:49 <bhyland> to what you just said PhilA2

Bernadette Hyland: to what you just said PhilA2

14:25:17 <olyerickson> sandro: Could do: create a "matrix" illustrating what terms are often consumed, what terms are rarely used.

Sandro Hawke: Could do: create a "matrix" illustrating what terms are often consumed, what terms are rarely used.

14:25:56 <olyerickson> sandro: If you don't know what the specific usage is, you don't know what to include/not include

Sandro Hawke: If you don't know what the specific usage is, you don't know what to include/not include

14:26:12 <olyerickson> * try really hard to include everything you have

* try really hard to include everything you have

14:26:33 <Zakim> -boris

Zakim IRC Bot: -boris

14:26:34 <olyerickson> bhyland: GLD is in the best practices business

Bernadette Hyland: GLD is in the best practices business

14:26:38 <PhilA2> q+

Phil Archer: q+

14:26:44 <Zakim> +mhausenblas

Zakim IRC Bot: +mhausenblas

14:26:49 <cygri> zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me

Richard Cyganiak: zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me

14:26:49 <Zakim> +cygri; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +cygri; got it

14:26:56 <George> q?

George Thomas: q?

14:27:02 <olyerickson> sandro: WG's such as GLD can provide strong/helpful advice

Sandro Hawke: WG's such as GLD can provide strong/helpful advice

14:27:10 <olyerickson> * to application developers

* to application developers

14:27:32 <olyerickson> PhilA2: Happy to include, "Include as much data as you can"

Phil Archer: Happy to include, "Include as much data as you can"

14:27:40 <olyerickson> * Specific applications in mind

* Specific applications in mind

14:27:52 <sandro> sandro: adivce people to publish using all the properties you can, and consume in a way that works even with lots of fields missing.

Sandro Hawke: adivce people to publish using all the properties you can, and consume in a way that works even with lots of fields missing. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ]

14:28:05 <olyerickson> ** CKAN: "If you want your data to appear on any CKAN portal, you must include these terms"

** CKAN: "If you want your data to appear on any CKAN portal, you must include these terms"

14:28:22 <olyerickson> ** EC "JoinUp" Platform: Same is true

** EC "JoinUp" Platform: Same is true

14:28:46 <olyerickson> ** Example: if description less than five terms, submission rejected

** Example: if description less than five terms, submission rejected

14:29:19 <olyerickson> * PhilA2: App/Service designers entitled; not part of vocab designers job

* PhilA2: App/Service designers entitled; not part of vocab designers job

14:29:23 <HadleyBeeman> :)

Hadley Beeman: :)

14:29:27 <cygri> :-)

Richard Cyganiak: :-)

14:29:49 <DeirdreLee> q?

Deirdre Lee: q?

14:29:53 <DeirdreLee> q+

Deirdre Lee: q+

14:29:55 <cygri> q+

Richard Cyganiak: q+

14:29:55 <PhilA2> q-

Phil Archer: q-

14:30:11 <olyerickson> * PhilA2: "This specification does not specify what you must do"

* PhilA2: "This specification does not specify what you must do"

14:30:12 <PhilA2> ack me

Phil Archer: ack me

14:30:21 <HadleyBeeman> Isn't the point of establishing standards that we find the points of commonality?  Each app/implementation may have additional requirements, no?

Hadley Beeman: Isn't the point of establishing standards that we find the points of commonality? Each app/implementation may have additional requirements, no?

14:31:01 <George> ack bhyland

George Thomas: ack bhyland

14:31:28 <olyerickson> * bhyland: PhilA2, please make it bulleted to make it more accessible; also, make conditionals more consistent/parsable

* bhyland: PhilA2, please make it bulleted to make it more accessible; also, make conditionals more consistent/parsable

14:31:32 <PhilA2> action: Phil to tidy up the conformance language, preferably with bullet points

ACTION: Phil to tidy up the conformance language, preferably with bullet points

14:31:32 <trackbot> Created ACTION-76 - Tidy up the conformance language, preferably with bullet points [on Phil Archer - due 2012-09-20].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-76 - Tidy up the conformance language, preferably with bullet points [on Phil Archer - due 2012-09-20].

14:31:53 <olyerickson> * DeirdreLee: Agrees with what has been discussed

* DeirdreLee: Agrees with what has been discussed

14:32:11 <bhyland> @PhilA2, please consider using same *format* as http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/#conformance

Bernadette Hyland: @PhilA2, please consider using same *format* as http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/#conformance

14:32:27 <olyerickson> ** Consider including word-of-warning, to indicate possible application requirements

** Consider including word-of-warning, to indicate possible application requirements

14:32:37 <George> ack DeirdreLee

George Thomas: ack DeirdreLee

14:32:40 <olyerickson> * Is conformance section required?

* Is conformance section required?

14:32:49 <George> ack cygri

George Thomas: ack cygri

14:32:55 <olyerickson> * cygri: Yes. But there are plenty that don't

* cygri: Yes. But there are plenty that don't

14:33:11 <olyerickson> * sandro: Makes perfect sense, from a "meaning" standpoinbt

* sandro: Makes perfect sense, from a "meaning" standpoinbt

14:33:26 <olyerickson> ** There is some inherent notion of conformance

** There is some inherent notion of conformance

14:33:34 <olyerickson> * PhilA2: There is another issue

* PhilA2: There is another issue

14:33:42 <olyerickson> ** Come back to it

** Come back to it

14:33:49 <bhyland> For example, People and Data Cube both need to get a Conformance section...

Bernadette Hyland: For example, People and Data Cube both need to get a Conformance section...

14:33:50 <olyerickson> * cygri: A couple points

* cygri: A couple points

14:34:08 <olyerickson> ** Dublin Core: Has notion of "Application Profile."

** Dublin Core: Has notion of "Application Profile."

14:34:20 <olyerickson> ** e.g. "using DC in this particular way"

** e.g. "using DC in this particular way"

14:34:48 <olyerickson> ** DC doesn't dictate, but particular applications do

** DC doesn't dictate, but particular applications do

14:35:09 <olyerickson> ** Specialization of properties, etc

** Specialization of properties, etc

14:35:34 <PhilA2> An example DC Application Profile http://dublincore.org/documents/library-application-profile/index.shtml

Phil Archer: An example DC Application Profile http://dublincore.org/documents/library-application-profile/index.shtml

14:35:39 <olyerickson> ** CKAN etal trying to define *Protocols* around vocabularies

** CKAN etal trying to define *Protocols* around vocabularies

14:36:06 <olyerickson> ** To actually exchange data based on these vocabs

** To actually exchange data based on these vocabs

14:36:20 <olyerickson> ** What's required, what's optional

** What's required, what's optional

14:36:59 <olyerickson> ** When we talk about conformance, need to discuss what kinds of things can conform

** When we talk about conformance, need to discuss what kinds of things can conform

14:37:32 <olyerickson> ** In the case of DCAT, kinds of "things" may be specifications, data APIs, etc

** In the case of DCAT, kinds of "things" may be specifications, data APIs, etc

14:37:51 <sandro> q?

Sandro Hawke: q?

14:37:59 <olyerickson> ** ie technical specifications need to use the vocab consistent with the definitions

** ie technical specifications need to use the vocab consistent with the definitions

14:38:03 <sandro> q+

Sandro Hawke: q+

14:38:20 <George> eg. federation/harvesting based on vocab + app-specific profile + protocol...

George Thomas: eg. federation/harvesting based on vocab + app-specific profile + protocol...

14:38:37 <olyerickson> ** We are defining something that would be used by others to define standards/interfaces

** We are defining something that would be used by others to define standards/interfaces

14:39:04 <olyerickson> sandro: Curious what cygri thinks about "lightweight" usage

Sandro Hawke: Curious what cygri thinks about "lightweight" usage

14:39:06 <George> q?

George Thomas: q?

14:39:32 <PhilA2> ack sandro

Phil Archer: ack sandro

14:39:36 <olyerickson> * cygri: There are plenty of specs "out there" that consist only of terminology

* cygri: There are plenty of specs "out there" that consist only of terminology

14:40:01 <olyerickson> ** Could we refer to e.g. ISO experience on 'conformance'

** Could we refer to e.g. ISO experience on 'conformance'

14:40:18 <olyerickson> ** possible to "certify," how do they do that?

** possible to "certify," how do they do that?

14:40:21 <George> certification is a key gov idea

George Thomas: certification is a key gov idea

14:40:41 <olyerickson> q+

q+

14:40:57 <olyerickson> PhilA2: Culturally closer to DC world

Phil Archer: Culturally closer to DC world

14:41:31 <olyerickson> * conformance means conforming to the semantics as well

* conformance means conforming to the semantics as well

14:41:58 <sandro> q+ to say it's not necessarily common sense

Sandro Hawke: q+ to say it's not necessarily common sense

14:42:09 <George> ack olyerickson

George Thomas: ack olyerickson

14:42:18 <sandro> q-

Sandro Hawke: q-

14:42:22 <PhilA2> olyerickson: Circling back to Richard's point. We can envision data APIs that say "uses DCAT etc."

John Erickson: Circling back to Richard's point. We can envision data APIs that say "uses DCAT etc." [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ]

14:42:45 <PhilA2> olyerickson: Then conject that a developer will take that literally and build something based on the spec

John Erickson: Then conject that a developer will take that literally and build something based on the spec [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ]

14:43:26 <PhilA2> ... that's why I think it's important to flag in the spec that this is the super set, this is what could be included. This is not a required list. Please refer to the application for guidance

Phil Archer: ... that's why I think it's important to flag in the spec that this is the super set, this is what could be included. This is not a required list. Please refer to the application for guidance

14:43:32 <PhilA2> PhilA2: +1 to olyerickson

Phil Archer: +1 to olyerickson [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ]

14:44:55 <PhilA2> olyerickson: Adopters might be very lightweight on what they use. They should be clear. People with queryable interfaces need to be clear on what is required and optional

John Erickson: Adopters might be very lightweight on what they use. They should be clear. People with queryable interfaces need to be clear on what is required and optional [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ]

14:45:26 <olyerickson> bhyland: Does this clarify? Is this enough?

Bernadette Hyland: Does this clarify? Is this enough?

14:45:41 <olyerickson> PhilA2: yes...thinks he knows what he'll say

Phil Archer: yes...thinks he knows what he'll say

14:46:09 <olyerickson> Topic: Otherwise very Loosely Derived Agenda Items

4. Otherwise very Loosely Derived Agenda Items

14:46:34 <olyerickson> * George: since we have cygri, recap DCAT resolution?

* George: since we have cygri, recap DCAT resolution?

14:46:56 <olyerickson> ** George: Does anyone recall DCAT resolution?

** George: Does anyone recall DCAT resolution?

14:47:03 <bhyland> @George - how about remaining Business Core vocab issues raised by email (this week) to allow Phil to complete actions assigned last week ...

Bernadette Hyland: @George - how about remaining Business Core vocab issues raised by email (this week) to allow Phil to complete actions assigned last week ...

14:47:32 <olyerickson> * PhilA2 and George searching for applicable minutes

* PhilA2 and George searching for applicable minutes

14:47:33 <PhilA2> This one http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-07-26

Phil Archer: This one http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-07-26

14:48:38 <olyerickson> * PhilA2 Subclasses, classes, resources, distributions, oh my!

* PhilA2 Subclasses, classes, resources, distributions, oh my!

14:48:54 <olyerickson> Topic: Business Core Vocab

5. Business Core Vocab

14:49:05 <Zakim> -GeraldSteeman

Zakim IRC Bot: -GeraldSteeman

14:49:16 <olyerickson> * bhyland: PhilA2 wants to get (this) up in W3C namespace

* bhyland: PhilA2 wants to get (this) up in W3C namespace

14:49:49 <PhilA2> Currently we have http://www.w3.org/ns/legal

Phil Archer: Currently we have http://www.w3.org/ns/legal

14:50:17 <olyerickson> PhilA2: Placeholder page that says 'It's coming..."

Phil Archer: Placeholder page that says 'It's coming..."

14:50:35 <olyerickson> * Currently being used by OpenCorporates, swedish govt etc

* Currently being used by OpenCorporates, swedish govt etc

14:50:49 <olyerickson> * Following comments, an updated version of ADMS coming

* Following comments, an updated version of ADMS coming

14:50:52 <bhyland> So the current Business Core Vocab in ED form, is here dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/legal/

Bernadette Hyland: So the current Business Core Vocab in ED form, is here dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/legal/

14:51:31 <HadleyBeeman> +1 to clearer

Hadley Beeman: +1 to clearer

14:51:35 <olyerickson> PhilA2: "legal" because of "legal entity"

Phil Archer: "legal" because of "legal entity"

14:51:38 <sandro> +1 legal-entity

Sandro Hawke: +1 legal-entity

14:52:03 <sandro> yeah -- maybe merge this and make it org 2.0 ?

Sandro Hawke: yeah -- maybe merge this and make it org 2.0 ?

14:52:11 <olyerickson> bhyland: PhilA2 is mixing things

Bernadette Hyland: PhilA2 is mixing things

14:52:28 <olyerickson> * Naming should be closer to what it is

* Naming should be closer to what it is

14:52:53 <olyerickson> * Term "legal" is too broad (so is "legal entity" but that's the deal)

* Term "legal" is too broad (so is "legal entity" but that's the deal)

14:53:28 <olyerickson> sandro: Example: W3C (may or may not be "legal entity"

Sandro Hawke: Example: W3C (may or may not be "legal entity"

14:53:32 <sandro> W3C most certainly does exist as an organization, but not a legal-entity.

Sandro Hawke: W3C most certainly does exist as an organization, but not a legal-entity.

14:54:20 <olyerickson> bhyland: Whole issue of OpenCorporates utilization is separate issue

Bernadette Hyland: Whole issue of OpenCorporates utilization is separate issue

14:54:37 <PhilA2> nothing to apologise for!

Phil Archer: nothing to apologise for!

14:54:53 <HadleyBeeman> I've been concerned about court data as well, bhyland

Hadley Beeman: I've been concerned about court data as well, bhyland

14:55:24 <olyerickson> PhilA2: This kind of issue is part of the "learning curve"

Phil Archer: This kind of issue is part of the "learning curve"

14:55:26 <bhyland> @Hadley, right, court data, licenses, all are "legal" mega categories.

Bernadette Hyland: @Hadley, right, court data, licenses, all are "legal" mega categories.

14:55:38 <olyerickson> * changing the namespace is a legitimate part of that learning curve

* changing the namespace is a legitimate part of that learning curve

14:55:59 <olyerickson> bhyland: So, what are next steps? Feedback?

Bernadette Hyland: So, what are next steps? Feedback?

14:56:08 <olyerickson> PhilA2: Two separate documents

Phil Archer: Two separate documents

14:56:13 <olyerickson> * Spec will be...

* Spec will be...

14:56:15 <PhilA2> specification /TR/vocab-legal-entity

Phil Archer: specification /TR/vocab-legal-entity

14:56:24 <olyerickson> * Namespace will be...

* Namespace will be...

14:56:26 <bhyland> +1, I'm OK with that

Bernadette Hyland: +1, I'm OK with that

14:56:28 <PhilA2> namespace logically is therefore /ns/legal-entity

Phil Archer: namespace logically is therefore /ns/legal-entity

14:56:59 <olyerickson> PhilA2: "horse in front of the cart..."

Phil Archer: "horse in front of the cart..."

14:57:08 <bhyland> PhilA2: First issue (TR one) is trivial to fix.  The second one, (ns/) is harder to change ...

Phil Archer: First issue (TR one) is trivial to fix. The second one, (ns/) is harder to change ... [ Scribe Assist by Bernadette Hyland ]

14:58:18 <olyerickson> bhyland: If you develop a system based on a proto vocab et.al....that's the risk you take

Bernadette Hyland: If you develop a system based on a proto vocab et.al....that's the risk you take

14:58:47 <olyerickson> +1 to early adopter usage being a sign of goodness

+1 to early adopter usage being a sign of goodness

14:58:47 <sandro> +1 bhyland -- we can't be held to be compatible with decisions we haven't made

Sandro Hawke: +1 bhyland -- we can't be held to be compatible with decisions we haven't made

14:59:08 <olyerickson> +1 to sandro to bhyland

+1 to sandro to bhyland

14:59:20 <olyerickson> PhilA2: In that case...

Phil Archer: In that case...

14:59:21 <bhyland> … +1 to sandro & John ;-)

Bernadette Hyland: … +1 to sandro & John ;-)

14:59:49 <olyerickson> * the group is happy for vocab to be know as the legal entity vocabulary

* the group is happy for vocab to be know as the legal entity vocabulary

14:59:51 <HadleyBeeman> +1 to the name changes.  Sounds good to me.

Hadley Beeman: +1 to the name changes. Sounds good to me.

14:59:52 <George> +1

George Thomas: +1

15:00:02 <olyerickson> * namespace should reflect both of those words

* namespace should reflect both of those words

15:00:04 <bhyland> Resolved: The vocabulary known as Business Core Vocabulary is now being changed to the "Legal Entity Vocabulary"

RESOLVED: The vocabulary known as Business Core Vocabulary is now being changed to the "Legal Entity Vocabulary"

15:00:07 <bhyland> +1

Bernadette Hyland: +1

15:00:19 <olyerickson> George: All right, then!

George Thomas: All right, then!

15:00:27 <HadleyBeeman> q+

Hadley Beeman: q+

15:00:38 <HadleyBeeman> hang on… finding mute

Hadley Beeman: hang on… finding mute

15:00:41 <bhyland> Resolved: The namespace previously known as /ns/legal shall be moved to /ns/legal-entity

RESOLVED: The namespace previously known as /ns/legal shall be moved to /ns/legal-entity

15:00:44 <bhyland> +1

Bernadette Hyland: +1

15:01:04 <PhilA2> PhilA2: I'd like to record my talks to the chairs for giving these issues time today

Phil Archer: I'd like to record my talks to the chairs for giving these issues time today [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ]

15:01:06 <olyerickson> HadleyBeeman: very hard to hear comments on Open data Initiative

Hadley Beeman: very hard to hear comments on Open data Initiative

15:01:22 <olyerickson> * Scribe literally can't hear HadleyBeeman

* Scribe literally can't hear HadleyBeeman

15:01:24 <PhilA2> HadleyBeeman: Alluncing Gavin Sparks as CEO and Jeni Tennison as CTO of the Open data Institute

Hadley Beeman: Announcing Gavin Sparks as CEO and Jeni Tennison as CTO of the Open data Institute [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ]

15:01:34 <PhilA2> s/Alluncing/Announcing/
15:01:54 <PhilA2> HadleyBeeman: Hoping that Jeni or a member of her team to join this WG

Hadley Beeman: Hoping that Jeni or a member of her team to join this WG [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ]

15:01:56 <George> really great news!

George Thomas: really great news!

15:02:08 <bhyland> Congratulations for all of you & for sharing this with us Hadley!

Bernadette Hyland: Congratulations for all of you & for sharing this with us Hadley!

15:02:22 <olyerickson> Awesome to have THE JeniT involved in this work!

Awesome to have THE JeniT involved in this work!

15:02:30 <George> q?

George Thomas: q?

15:02:34 <George> ack HadleyBeeman

George Thomas: ack HadleyBeeman

15:02:34 <HadleyBeeman> q-

Hadley Beeman: q-

15:02:37 <olyerickson> Topic: Pre-Adjournment?

6. Pre-Adjournment?

15:02:40 <olyerickson> None

None

15:02:49 <bhyland> @PhilA2 thanks for moving these issues forward.  Thanks all for input on vocabs … we made progress :-)

Bernadette Hyland: @PhilA2 thanks for moving these issues forward. Thanks all for input on vocabs … we made progress :-)

15:02:57 <olyerickson> Have a great one

Have a great one

15:03:00 <Zakim> -HadleyBeeman

Zakim IRC Bot: -HadleyBeeman

15:03:01 <Zakim> -Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro

15:03:01 <Zakim> -cygri

Zakim IRC Bot: -cygri

15:03:01 <Zakim> -bhyland

Zakim IRC Bot: -bhyland

15:03:01 <Zakim> -Yigal

Zakim IRC Bot: -Yigal

15:03:09 <Zakim> -DeirdreLee

Zakim IRC Bot: -DeirdreLee

15:03:12 <Zakim> -PhilA2

Zakim IRC Bot: -PhilA2

15:03:31 <George> RRSAgent, set logs world-visible

George Thomas: RRSAgent, set logs world-visible

15:03:45 <George> RRSAgent, generate minutes

George Thomas: RRSAgent, generate minutes

15:03:45 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/09/13-gld-minutes.html George

RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/09/13-gld-minutes.html George

15:06:34 <Zakim> -olyerickson

Zakim IRC Bot: -olyerickson

15:06:35 <Zakim> -George_Thomas

Zakim IRC Bot: -George_Thomas

15:06:36 <Zakim> T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended

Zakim IRC Bot: T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended

15:06:36 <Zakim> Attendees were Sandro, George_Thomas, +1.757.604.aaaa, olyerickson, DeirdreLee, GeraldSteeman, bhyland, PhilA2, Yigal, +1.440.389.aacc, HadleyBeeman, +34.60.062.aadd, boris, cygri

Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were Sandro, George_Thomas, +1.757.604.aaaa, olyerickson, DeirdreLee, GeraldSteeman, bhyland, PhilA2, Yigal, +1.440.389.aacc, HadleyBeeman, +34.60.062.aadd, boris, cygri



Formatted by CommonScribe