13:56:45 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/12/12-dwbp-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/12/12-dwbp-irc ←
13:57:28 <phila> phila has changed the topic to: Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20141212
Phil Archer: phila has changed the topic to: Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20141212 ←
13:57:36 <phila> RRSAgent, make logs public
Phil Archer: RRSAgent, make logs public ←
13:57:45 <phila> zakim, this will be dwbp
Phil Archer: zakim, this will be dwbp ←
13:57:45 <Zakim> ok, phila; I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, phila; I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes ←
13:58:42 <Zakim> DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has now started ←
13:58:49 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:58:49 <phila> zakim, ipcaller is me
Phil Archer: zakim, ipcaller is me ←
13:58:50 <Zakim> +phila; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +phila; got it ←
13:59:41 <gatemezi> Hi all
Ghislain Atemezing: Hi all ←
13:59:58 <cgueret> hello!
Christophe Gueret: hello! ←
13:59:58 <phila> Guest: Reinaldo Ferraz
14:00:10 <Zakim> +??P21
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P21 ←
14:00:12 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:00:20 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> Zakim, IPcaller i sme
Joao Almeida: Zakim, IPcaller i sme ←
14:00:20 <Zakim> I don't understand 'IPcaller i sme', JoaoPauloAlmeida
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'IPcaller i sme', JoaoPauloAlmeida ←
14:00:26 <MTCarrasco> zakim, ??P21 is me
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: zakim, ??P21 is me ←
14:00:26 <Zakim> +MTCarrasco; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MTCarrasco; got it ←
14:00:26 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> Zakim, IPcaller is me
Joao Almeida: Zakim, IPcaller is me ←
14:00:27 <Zakim> +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it ←
14:01:36 <hadleybeeman> Hello!
Hadley Beeman: Hello! ←
14:02:03 <hadleybeeman> Oh no! Sorry to hear that, cgueret
Hadley Beeman: Oh no! Sorry to hear that, cgueret ←
14:02:38 <Zakim> + +1.509.554.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.509.554.aaaa ←
14:02:51 <ericstephan> zakim, +1.509 is me
Eric Stephan: zakim, +1.509 is me ←
14:02:51 <Zakim> +ericstephan; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +ericstephan; got it ←
14:02:58 <Zakim> +??P28
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P28 ←
14:03:04 <cgueret> Zakim, ??P28 is me
Christophe Gueret: Zakim, ??P28 is me ←
14:03:04 <Zakim> +cgueret; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +cgueret; got it ←
14:03:09 <cgueret> zakim, mute me
Christophe Gueret: zakim, mute me ←
14:03:09 <Zakim> cgueret should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: cgueret should now be muted ←
14:03:20 <Zakim> +Reinaldo
Zakim IRC Bot: +Reinaldo ←
14:03:31 <phila> phila has changed the topic to: Agenda: Chair brought to you by Royal Appointment. We are your humble servants, ready to do as you command
Phil Archer: phila has changed the topic to: Agenda: Chair brought to you by Royal Appointment. We are your humble servants, ready to do as you command ←
14:03:48 <cgueret> :)
Christophe Gueret: :) ←
14:03:54 <hadleybeeman> Ha! Thanks, PhilA. *blushes*
Hadley Beeman: Ha! Thanks, PhilA. *blushes* ←
14:04:34 <yaso> Hi all
Yaso Córdova: Hi all ←
14:04:39 <phila> Hi yaso
Phil Archer: Hi yaso ←
14:05:07 <yaso> I was going to ask about this, hadleybeeman ...
Yaso Córdova: I was going to ask about this, hadleybeeman ... ←
14:05:09 <Zakim> +Steve
Zakim IRC Bot: +Steve ←
14:05:17 <phila> phila has changed the topic to: Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20141212
Phil Archer: phila has changed the topic to: Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20141212 ←
14:05:34 <Zakim> + +1.510.384.aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.510.384.aabb ←
14:05:52 <yaso> Zakim, yaso has newton
Yaso Córdova: Zakim, yaso has newton ←
14:05:52 <Zakim> sorry, yaso, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, yaso, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso' ←
14:06:04 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:06:11 <yaso> Zakim, who’s on the phone
Yaso Córdova: Zakim, who’s on the phone ←
14:06:11 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who’s on the phone', yaso
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'who’s on the phone', yaso ←
14:06:16 <Zakim> + +39.349.096.aacc
Zakim IRC Bot: + +39.349.096.aacc ←
14:06:17 <laufer> Zakim, IPcaller is me
Carlos Laufer: Zakim, IPcaller is me ←
14:06:17 <Zakim> +laufer; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +laufer; got it ←
14:06:38 <yaso> Zakim, Caroline is yaso
Yaso Córdova: Zakim, Caroline is yaso ←
14:06:38 <Zakim> sorry, yaso, I do not recognize a party named 'Caroline'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, yaso, I do not recognize a party named 'Caroline' ←
14:06:40 <laufer> zakim, mute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, mute me ←
14:06:40 <Zakim> laufer should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should now be muted ←
14:07:00 <RiccardoAlbertoni> zakim, +39.349.096.aacc is me
Riccardo Albertoni: zakim, +39.349.096.aacc is me ←
14:07:00 <Zakim> +RiccardoAlbertoni; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +RiccardoAlbertoni; got it ←
14:08:19 <Zakim> +HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: +HadleyBeeman ←
14:08:39 <Zakim> +??P33
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P33 ←
14:08:40 <RiccardoAlbertoni> Hello all
Riccardo Albertoni: Hello all ←
14:08:44 <Zakim> + +33.4.93.00.aadd
Zakim IRC Bot: + +33.4.93.00.aadd ←
14:09:00 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> Zakim who is making noise?
Joao Almeida: Zakim who is making noise? ←
14:09:03 <cgueret> :-)
Christophe Gueret: :-) ←
14:09:08 <cgueret> hello!
Christophe Gueret: hello! ←
14:09:22 <AdrianoC> Zakim, ??P33 is AdrianoC
Adriano Pereira: Zakim, ??P33 is AdrianoC ←
14:09:22 <Zakim> +AdrianoC; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AdrianoC; got it ←
14:09:43 <gatemezi> Zakim, +33.4.93.00.aadd is me
Ghislain Atemezing: Zakim, +33.4.93.00.aadd is me ←
14:09:43 <Zakim> +gatemezi; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +gatemezi; got it ←
14:09:51 <Zakim> +??P32
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P32 ←
14:10:08 <jerdeb> Zakim, ??P32 is me
Jeremy Debattista: Zakim, ??P32 is me ←
14:10:08 <Zakim> +jerdeb; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +jerdeb; got it ←
14:10:42 <laufer> Hot
Carlos Laufer: Hot ←
14:10:47 <phila> PROPOSED: Accept last week's minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-05
PROPOSED: Accept last week's minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-05 ←
14:10:51 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> laufer lives in Rio :-)
Joao Almeida: laufer lives in Rio :-) ←
14:10:52 <laufer> very hot
Carlos Laufer: very hot ←
14:10:58 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> right?
Joao Almeida: right? ←
14:11:05 <laufer> right
Carlos Laufer: right ←
14:11:36 <gatemezi> +0 since I was absent
Ghislain Atemezing: +0 since I was absent ←
14:11:39 <newton> +1
Newton Calegari: +1 ←
14:11:39 <ericstephan> +0 didn't attend
Eric Stephan: +0 didn't attend ←
14:11:41 <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 ←
14:11:43 <phila> I was impressed to see that Sumit scribed so well last week that I didn't need to make any edits to get rid of red boxes
Phil Archer: I was impressed to see that Sumit scribed so well last week that I didn't need to make any edits to get rid of red boxes ←
14:11:46 <AdrianoC> +1
Adriano Pereira: +1 ←
14:11:48 <laufer> +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 ←
14:11:50 <annette_g> I was in Michigan, not very hot
Annette Greiner: I was in Michigan, not very hot ←
14:11:57 <yaso> scribe: yaso
(Scribe set to Yaso Córdova)
14:11:57 <yaso> proposed: aprove last week’s minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-12
PROPOSED: aprove last week’s minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-12 ←
14:11:57 <yaso> PROPOSED: aprove last week’s minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-12
PROPOSED: aprove last week’s minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-12 ←
14:11:57 <yaso> +1
+1 ←
14:11:57 <yaso> PROPOSED: aprove last week’s minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-12
PROPOSED: aprove last week’s minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-12 ←
14:12:09 <annette_g> +1
Annette Greiner: +1 ←
14:12:14 <cgueret> that's the minutes for today...
Christophe Gueret: that's the minutes for today... ←
14:12:22 <adler1> +1
Steven Adler: +1 ←
14:12:42 <cgueret> +1 to approve last week minutes
Christophe Gueret: +1 to approve last week minutes ←
14:12:48 <phila> RESOLVED: Accept last week's minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-05
RESOLVED: Accept last week's minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-05 ←
14:12:50 <gatemezi> We still continue with +1's from phil link ;)
Ghislain Atemezing: We still continue with +1's from phil link ;) ←
14:13:04 <phila> agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20141212
14:13:15 <phila> chair: Hadley
14:14:06 <phila> Regrets: Makx, Antoine
14:14:23 <cgueret> Zakim, unmute me
Christophe Gueret: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:14:23 <Zakim> cgueret should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: cgueret should no longer be muted ←
14:14:35 <gatemezi> Not sure to understand ..
Ghislain Atemezing: Not sure to understand .. ←
14:14:48 <phila> I think Newton is talking about http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/
Phil Archer: I think Newton is talking about http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/ ←
14:14:51 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:14:53 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, ipcaller is BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, ipcaller is BernadetteLoscio ←
14:14:53 <Zakim> +BernadetteLoscio; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +BernadetteLoscio; got it ←
14:15:03 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio ←
14:15:03 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio should now be muted ←
14:15:40 <MTCarrasco> xmllint
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: xmllint ←
14:15:52 <cgueret> https://github.com/w3c/tidy-html5
Christophe Gueret: https://github.com/w3c/tidy-html5 ←
14:16:00 <cgueret> tidy -im bp.html
Christophe Gueret: tidy -im bp.html ←
14:16:23 <gatemezi> Zakim, unmute me
Ghislain Atemezing: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:16:23 <Zakim> gatemezi should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: gatemezi should no longer be muted ←
14:17:14 <yaso_> newton: I think that everyone that is editting the document should use the same html format
Newton Calegari: I think that everyone that is editting the document should use the same html format ←
14:17:48 <phila> q+
Phil Archer: q+ ←
14:17:58 <yaso_> q+
q+ ←
14:18:05 <phila> ack me
Phil Archer: ack me ←
14:18:06 <nathalia> Zakim, yaso has nathalia
Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício: Zakim, yaso has nathalia ←
14:18:06 <Zakim> sorry, nathalia, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, nathalia, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso' ←
14:18:13 <nathalia> Zakim, yaso_ has nathalia
Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício: Zakim, yaso_ has nathalia ←
14:18:13 <Zakim> sorry, nathalia, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso_'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, nathalia, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso_' ←
14:18:22 <nathalia> Zakim, yaso has nathalia
Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício: Zakim, yaso has nathalia ←
14:18:22 <Zakim> sorry, nathalia, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, nathalia, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso' ←
14:18:35 <yaso> phila: the reason that we had a problem with a merge this week is that html tidy changes things
Phil Archer: the reason that we had a problem with a merge this week is that html tidy changes things ←
14:18:44 <nathalia> Zakim, caroline has nathalia
Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício: Zakim, caroline has nathalia ←
14:18:44 <Zakim> sorry, nathalia, I do not recognize a party named 'caroline'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, nathalia, I do not recognize a party named 'caroline' ←
14:19:03 <adler1> +1 phila
Steven Adler: +1 phila ←
14:19:09 <cgueret> +1
Christophe Gueret: +1 ←
14:19:11 <MTCarrasco> q
14:19:14 <MTCarrasco> q+
14:19:17 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> the editor could use it...
Joao Almeida: the editor could use it... ←
14:19:29 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> to clean things up
Joao Almeida: to clean things up ←
14:19:35 <BernadetteLoscio> we can use just in the end?
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we can use just in the end? ←
14:19:45 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> yes at certain milestones
Joao Almeida: yes at certain milestones ←
14:19:50 <cgueret> zakim, mute me
Christophe Gueret: zakim, mute me ←
14:19:50 <Zakim> cgueret should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: cgueret should now be muted ←
14:19:55 <cgueret> +1 to that
Christophe Gueret: +1 to that ←
14:19:57 <phila> +1
Phil Archer: +1 ←
14:19:57 <gatemezi> +1
Ghislain Atemezing: +1 ←
14:20:03 <annette_g> +1
Annette Greiner: +1 ←
14:20:13 <phila> q?
Phil Archer: q? ←
14:20:15 <yaso> newton: we keep editing the document without using tidy and just run it at the end ?
Newton Calegari: we keep editing the document without using tidy and just run it at the end ? ←
14:20:18 <yaso> +1
+1 ←
14:20:22 <yaso> q-
q- ←
14:20:30 <yaso> q-
q- ←
14:20:36 <phila> q+
Phil Archer: q+ ←
14:20:40 <phila> ack MTCarrasco
Phil Archer: ack MTCarrasco ←
14:20:58 <yaso> q-
q- ←
14:21:06 <phila> MTCarrasco: I use XML Lint - it gives a minimal syntax validation
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: I use XML Lint - it gives a minimal syntax validation [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ] ←
14:21:08 <MTCarrasco> q-
14:21:11 <phila> ack me
Phil Archer: ack me ←
14:21:46 <MTCarrasco> +1
14:21:49 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> +1
Joao Almeida: +1 ←
14:21:51 <yaso> phila: I suggest to move on to the standards document
Phil Archer: I suggest to move on to the standards document ←
14:21:51 <phila> q- yaso_
Phil Archer: q- yaso_ ←
14:21:52 <yaso> +1
+1 ←
14:21:53 <cgueret> +1
Christophe Gueret: +1 ←
14:21:54 <gatemezi> +1
Ghislain Atemezing: +1 ←
14:21:55 <MTCarrasco> to Phil
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: to Phil ←
14:22:07 <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1 to Phil
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 to Phil ←
14:22:34 <yaso> Newton: no problem, I’ll send an email later
Newton Calegari: no problem, I’ll send an email later ←
14:22:42 <yaso> topic: Best practices document
14:23:03 <yaso> hadleybeeman: this discussion should be guided by the editors
Hadley Beeman: this discussion should be guided by the editors ←
14:23:07 <phila> regrets+ Caroline
Phil Archer: regrets+ Caroline ←
14:23:17 <yaso> newton: caroline is not here
Newton Calegari: caroline is not here ←
14:23:40 <newton> BernadetteLoscio can you hear us?
Newton Calegari: BernadetteLoscio can you hear us? ←
14:23:44 <BernadetteLoscio> yes...
Bernadette Farias Loscio: yes... ←
14:23:51 <BernadetteLoscio> there is a lot of noisy here
Bernadette Farias Loscio: there is a lot of noisy here ←
14:23:56 <BernadetteLoscio> i can try to talk
Bernadette Farias Loscio: i can try to talk ←
14:24:12 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio ←
14:24:12 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio should no longer be muted ←
14:24:31 <yaso> BernadetteLoscio: to noise here, and with bad connection
Bernadette Farias Loscio: to noise here, and with bad connection ←
14:24:59 <yaso> BernadetteLoscio: I’m happy we have a first version, thanks, but we still have a lot of work to do
Bernadette Farias Loscio: I’m happy we have a first version, thanks, but we still have a lot of work to do ←
14:25:29 <yaso> BernadetteLoscio: we had a discussion about the audience, this is one of my ponts, the other is about the organizations of the best practices: if we are going to organize it
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we had a discussion about the audience, this is one of my points, the other is about the organizations of the best practices: if we are going to organize it ←
14:25:41 <BernadetteLoscio> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html
Bernadette Farias Loscio: http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html ←
14:25:46 <gatemezi> s/ponts/points
14:25:50 <yaso> .. according to the lifecicle or other organization
.. according to the lifecycle or other organization ←
14:26:20 <MTCarrasco> q+
14:26:50 <yaso> … the other thing is that I don’t know if our priority now, to have the 1st wd, is writing more content on sections that are empty or continue editing the sections that are already being constructed
… the other thing is that I don’t know if our priority now, to have the 1st wd, is writing more content on sections that are empty or continue editing the sections that are already being constructed ←
14:26:53 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> s/lifecicle/lifecycle
14:27:03 <yaso> … this is something that I would like to discuss with the group
… this is something that I would like to discuss with the group ←
14:27:04 <adler1> q+
Steven Adler: q+ ←
14:27:09 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio ←
14:27:09 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio should now be muted ←
14:27:24 <hadleybeeman> ack mt
Hadley Beeman: ack mt ←
14:27:34 <yaso> MTCarrasco: regarding the content: I’m adding parts of the COMURI document
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: regarding the content: I’m adding parts of the COMURI document ←
14:27:37 <MTCarrasco> http://dragoman.org/bpc.html
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: http://dragoman.org/bpc.html ←
14:27:40 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
14:27:56 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q+ ←
14:28:03 <yaso> … and there was no comments about the document, so I’m going forward merging it
… and there was no comments about the document, so I’m going forward merging it ←
14:28:23 <cgueret> q+ to speak about preservation, again
Christophe Gueret: q+ to speak about preservation, again ←
14:28:37 <hadleybeeman> ack adler
Hadley Beeman: ack adler ←
14:28:48 <yaso> adler1: first I wanna to comment that we’re doing fantastic work
Steven Adler: first I wanna to comment that we’re doing fantastic work ←
14:29:00 <BernadetteLoscio> Tomas, before doing the merge, I think you should specify in which sections of the BP document the information from COMURI should be included.
Bernadette Farias Loscio: Tomas, before doing the merge, I think you should specify in which sections of the BP document the information from COMURI should be included. ←
14:29:04 <hadleybeeman> +1 to Steve: everyone on the BP doc has done a great amount of work
Hadley Beeman: +1 to Steve: everyone on the BP doc has done a great amount of work ←
14:29:11 <hadleybeeman> zakim, who is noisy?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who is noisy? ←
14:29:15 <yaso> Zakim, whos noisy?
Zakim, whos noisy? ←
14:29:15 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, yaso.
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand your question, yaso. ←
14:29:22 <Zakim> hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Steve (67%), Reinaldo (14%), gatemezi (45%)
Zakim IRC Bot: hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Steve (67%), Reinaldo (14%), gatemezi (45%) ←
14:29:36 <gatemezi> Zakim, mute me
Ghislain Atemezing: Zakim, mute me ←
14:29:36 <Zakim> gatemezi should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: gatemezi should now be muted ←
14:30:23 <yaso> … phil has begun with providing some native english to the document, I can help with this too
… phil has begun with providing some native english to the document, I can help with this too ←
14:30:45 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
14:30:49 <yaso> adler1: I suggest that the group can focus on content and not with sintaxes
Steven Adler: I suggest that the group can focus on content and not with sintaxes ←
14:30:58 <hadleybeeman> ack annete
Hadley Beeman: ack annete ←
14:31:01 <hadleybeeman> ack annette
Hadley Beeman: ack annette ←
14:31:03 <MTCarrasco> Bernadette: the sections that are starting to appear in BP and that are in http://dragoman.org/bpc.html and http://dragoman.org/comuri.html
Bernadette Farias Loscio: the sections that are starting to appear in BP and that are in http://dragoman.org/bpc.html and http://dragoman.org/comuri.html [ Scribe Assist by Manuel Carrasco Benitez ] ←
14:31:32 <MTCarrasco> URI should be in COMURI
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: URI should be in COMURI ←
14:31:37 <yaso> hadleybeeman: are you talking about the COMURI?
Hadley Beeman: are you talking about the COMURI? ←
14:31:54 <yaso> hadleybeeman: we have to agree on publishing the COMURI document
Hadley Beeman: we have to agree on publishing the COMURI document ←
14:32:03 <MTCarrasco> q+
14:32:48 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:32:51 <hadleybeeman> ack bernadette
Hadley Beeman: ack bernadette ←
14:32:51 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio ←
14:32:53 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio was not muted, BernadetteLoscio
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio was not muted, BernadetteLoscio ←
14:33:02 <CarlosIglesias> zakim, [ipcaller] is me
Carlos Iglesias: zakim, [ipcaller] is me ←
14:33:02 <Zakim> +CarlosIglesias; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +CarlosIglesias; got it ←
14:33:32 <Zakim> -HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: -HadleyBeeman ←
14:33:33 <yaso> BernadetteLoscio: we should not be specific about technologies, so MTCarrasco if you can
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we should not be specific about technologies, so MTCarrasco if you can ←
14:33:47 <Zakim> +HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: +HadleyBeeman ←
14:33:55 <yaso> … check what information fits in each section
… check what information fits in each section ←
14:34:05 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio ←
14:34:05 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio should now be muted ←
14:34:07 <yaso> … just to help us to organize all this information of the COMURI document
… just to help us to organize all this information of the COMURI document ←
14:34:07 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
14:34:33 <hadleybeeman> ack mtcarrasco
Hadley Beeman: ack mtcarrasco ←
14:34:45 <Zakim> +??P37
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P37 ←
14:34:45 <yaso> MTCarrasco: the point is: dont’ want to merge the document if the content is not relevant
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: the point is: dont’ want to merge the document if the content is not relevant ←
14:34:50 <cgueret> zakim, ??P37 is me
Christophe Gueret: zakim, ??P37 is me ←
14:34:50 <Zakim> +cgueret; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +cgueret; got it ←
14:34:54 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
14:35:01 <yaso> … the COMURI is mostly concerned about URIs
… the COMURI is mostly concerned about URIs ←
14:35:56 <yaso> … I’ll have to create a new section on
… I’ll have to create a new section on ←
14:36:04 <hadleybeeman> ack cgueret
Hadley Beeman: ack cgueret ←
14:36:05 <Zakim> cgueret, you wanted to speak about preservation, again
Zakim IRC Bot: cgueret, you wanted to speak about preservation, again ←
14:36:47 <MTCarrasco> archiving +1
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: archiving +1 ←
14:37:00 <MTCarrasco> q+
14:37:10 <yaso> cgueret: can you repeat your proposal?
Christophe Gueret: can you repeat your proposal? ←
14:37:33 <adler1> q+
Steven Adler: q+ ←
14:37:39 <cgueret> currently as 6.2.2 on github
Christophe Gueret: currently as 6.2.2 on github ←
14:37:44 <gatemezi> section 6.2.2 cgueret
Ghislain Atemezing: section 6.2.2 cgueret ←
14:37:45 <yaso> cgueret: thanks
Christophe Gueret: thanks ←
14:37:49 <newton> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#dataPreservation
Newton Calegari: http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#dataPreservation ←
14:38:11 <hadleybeeman> ack mt
Hadley Beeman: ack mt ←
14:38:15 <cgueret> zakim, mute me
Christophe Gueret: zakim, mute me ←
14:38:15 <Zakim> cgueret should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: cgueret should now be muted ←
14:38:22 <yaso> MTCarrasco: This is a good way to put it
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: This is a good way to put it ←
14:38:28 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> I bleieve that preservation is outside the scope because our focus in on the interoperability of data (data on the web).
Joao Almeida: I believe that preservation is outside the scope because our focus in on the interoperability of data (data on the web). ←
14:38:38 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> s/bleieve/believe
14:38:45 <adler1> I agree with this
Steven Adler: I agree with this ←
14:38:55 <hadleybeeman> ack adler
Hadley Beeman: ack adler ←
14:38:59 <yaso> MTCarrasco: how to adress that should be in the scope
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: how to adress that should be in the scope ←
14:39:03 <laufer> +1 to tomas
Carlos Laufer: +1 to tomas ←
14:39:14 <yaso> +1 also
+1 also ←
14:39:18 <cgueret> BP9 right now for this
Christophe Gueret: BP9 right now for this ←
14:39:27 <cgueret> ;)
Christophe Gueret: ;) ←
14:39:39 <cgueret> zakim, unmute me
Christophe Gueret: zakim, unmute me ←
14:39:39 <Zakim> cgueret should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: cgueret should no longer be muted ←
14:39:41 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> so, requirements on the preservation are relevant (agreeing with MTCarrasco)
Joao Almeida: so, requirements on the preservation are relevant (agreeing with MTCarrasco) ←
14:39:48 <yaso> hadleybeeman: I don’t think you need formal approval of the group
Hadley Beeman: I don’t think you need formal approval of the group ←
14:40:06 <cgueret> zakim, mute me
Christophe Gueret: zakim, mute me ←
14:40:06 <Zakim> cgueret should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: cgueret should now be muted ←
14:40:08 <yaso> Thanks JoaoPauloAlmeida
Thanks JoaoPauloAlmeida ←
14:40:29 <yaso> hadleybeeman: What else do we need to have at the document for the FPWD
Hadley Beeman: What else do we need to have at the document for the FPWD ←
14:40:40 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio ←
14:40:40 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio should no longer be muted ←
14:40:54 <yaso> hadleybeeman: do you want to propose specific questions to the group?
Hadley Beeman: do you want to propose specific questions to the group? ←
14:41:36 <yaso> BernadetteLoscio: we had discussions by email about the audience, annette_g asked if we are going to consider both publishers and consumers
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we had discussions by email about the audience, annette_g asked if we are going to consider both publishers and consumers ←
14:41:44 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
14:41:45 <yaso> … I think that we should consider both
… I think that we should consider both ←
14:42:04 <yaso> BernadetteLoscio: we need to decide if we are going to consider data publishers and data consumers
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we need to decide if we are going to consider data publishers and data consumers ←
14:42:25 <ericstephan> +1 @BernadetteLoscio publishers and consumers
Eric Stephan: +1 @BernadetteLoscio publishers and consumers ←
14:42:27 <yaso> … in my opinion, the Best Practices should be for both
… in my opinion, the Best Practices should be for both ←
14:42:33 <RiccardoAlbertoni> I agree on having both data consumer and publisher, they are at some extents two faces of the same coin.
Riccardo Albertoni: I agree on having both data consumer and publisher, they are at some extents two faces of the same coin. ←
14:42:37 <hadleybeeman> ack annette
Hadley Beeman: ack annette ←
14:42:39 <yaso> .. I think data consumers should be aware of it also
.. I think data consumers should be aware of it also ←
14:43:04 <MTCarrasco> I need to know if I merge into BP some relevant sections or not: data packing, etc - COMURI syntax should be a separated doc
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: I need to know if I merge into BP some relevant sections or not: data packing, etc - COMURI syntax should be a separated doc ←
14:43:06 <jerdeb> +1 for Bernadette's view on data publishers and consumers
Jeremy Debattista: +1 for Bernadette's view on data publishers and consumers ←
14:43:12 <yaso> annette_g: looking at the list of the best practices that we have now, It seems to me that we should focus on publishers
Annette Greiner: looking at the list of the best practices that we have now, It seems to me that we should focus on publishers ←
14:43:22 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q+ ←
14:43:26 <laufer> a person that is responsible for defining a URI scheme is a data publisher?
Carlos Laufer: a person that is responsible for defining a URI scheme is a data publisher? ←
14:43:35 <ericstephan> q+
Eric Stephan: q+ ←
14:43:36 <yaso> … I don’t know either, but I would like to see what other think about it
… I don’t know either, but I would like to see what other think about it ←
14:43:44 <BernadetteLoscio> q-
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q- ←
14:43:49 <yaso> q?
q? ←
14:43:57 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q+ ←
14:44:04 <hadleybeeman> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Scope
Hadley Beeman: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Scope ←
14:44:28 <hadleybeeman> ack ericstephan
Hadley Beeman: ack ericstephan ←
14:44:33 <MTCarrasco> laufer URI : yes the publisher is the URI minter
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: laufer URI : yes the publisher is the URI minter ←
14:44:37 <gatemezi> I agree that we should focus on publishers, but also to take into account consumers view during the publication process
Ghislain Atemezing: I agree that we should focus on publishers, but also to take into account consumers view during the publication process ←
14:44:46 <yaso> ericstephan: I just want to add that even if the document is focused on published
Eric Stephan: I just want to add that even if the document is focused on published ←
14:45:09 <annette_g> +1 to considering consumers in info for publishers
Annette Greiner: +1 to considering consumers in info for publishers ←
14:45:18 <MTCarrasco> +1
14:45:23 <yaso> ericstephan: I think that to publish data without consumers in mind don’t seems to me a good practice
Eric Stephan: I think that to publish data without consumers in mind don’t seems to me a good practice ←
14:45:25 <phila> q+ to make a new suggestion
Phil Archer: q+ to make a new suggestion ←
14:45:36 <MTCarrasco> Consumer are the customers
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: Consumer are the customers ←
14:45:46 <hadleybeeman> ack bern
Hadley Beeman: ack bern ←
14:46:00 <yaso> BernadetteLoscio: in the document, section 6.3 it’s about BP for external user feedback
Bernadette Farias Loscio: in the document, section 6.3 it’s about BP for external user feedback ←
14:46:02 <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1 to ericstephan
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 to ericstephan ←
14:46:03 <laufer> I agree that consumers are consumers... but consumers could assume a publisher role too...
Carlos Laufer: I agree that consumers are consumers... but consumers could assume a publisher role too... ←
14:46:15 <nathalia> +1 to ericstephan
Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício: +1 to ericstephan ←
14:46:21 <yaso> .. if we are going to consider data enrichment we will have to consider how this data will be used
.. if we are going to consider data enrichment we will have to consider how this data will be used ←
14:46:34 <phila> q-
Phil Archer: q- ←
14:46:34 <yaso> … we will have to consider how to use this data
… we will have to consider how to use this data ←
14:46:43 <MTCarrasco> q+
14:47:01 <yaso> q+
q+ ←
14:47:24 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
14:47:37 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio ←
14:47:37 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio should now be muted ←
14:47:42 <hadleybeeman> ack mt
Hadley Beeman: ack mt ←
14:47:59 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio ←
14:47:59 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio should no longer be muted ←
14:47:59 <yaso> MTCarrasco: the point of the lifecycle - should we take archiving in to account?
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: the point of the lifecycle - should we take archiving in to account? ←
14:48:34 <yaso> MTCarrasco: if the data is dinamic, it will be impossible to read it in the future
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: if the data is dinamic, it will be impossible to read it in the future ←
14:48:37 <hadleybeeman> ack yaso
Hadley Beeman: ack yaso ←
14:48:40 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio ←
14:48:40 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio should now be muted ←
14:49:07 <MTCarrasco> static vs. dynamic data - http://dragoman.org/bpc.html#static-and-dynamic-data
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: static vs. dynamic data - http://dragoman.org/bpc.html#static-and-dynamic-data ←
14:49:24 <cgueret> q+ to discuss that data on the web is by definition dynamic
Christophe Gueret: q+ to discuss that data on the web is by definition dynamic ←
14:49:25 <gatemezi> Bernadette: Are we going to draft a "big picture" of the lifecycle ?
Ghislain Atemezing: A question to Bernadette: Are we going to draft a "big picture" of the lifecycle ? ←
14:49:37 <BernadetteLoscio> yes!
Bernadette Farias Loscio: yes! ←
14:49:42 <gatemezi> s/Bernadette/ A question to Bernadette
14:49:52 <BernadetteLoscio> It is part of our plans
Bernadette Farias Loscio: It is part of our plans ←
14:49:54 <BernadetteLoscio> :0
Bernadette Farias Loscio: :0 ←
14:49:57 <BernadetteLoscio> :)
Bernadette Farias Loscio: :) ←
14:50:13 <hadleybeeman> q+ to draw things back to the scope: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Scope
Hadley Beeman: q+ to draw things back to the scope: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Scope ←
14:50:15 <yaso> annette_g: I wanna to adress this question about data enrichnment
Annette Greiner: I wanna to adress this question about data enrichnment ←
14:50:36 <yaso> annette_g: surely people can reuse data
Annette Greiner: surely people can reuse data ←
14:50:40 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q+ ←
14:50:42 <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1 to Yaso!!!;)
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 to Yaso!!!;) ←
14:50:49 <laufer> q+
Carlos Laufer: q+ ←
14:51:00 <MTCarrasco> Cooks often eat their own food: we must be able to read our own data in the next 25 to 50 years
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: Cooks often eat their own food: we must be able to read our own data in the next 25 to 50 years ←
14:51:24 <cgueret> that's why we need data preservation
Christophe Gueret: that's why we need data preservation ←
14:51:27 <yaso> … I support doing a separate document - the question of the organization of the data lyfecycle
… I support doing a separate document - the question of the organization of the data lyfecycle ←
14:51:56 <cgueret> Zakim, ack me
Christophe Gueret: Zakim, ack me ←
14:51:56 <Zakim> unmuting cgueret
Zakim IRC Bot: unmuting cgueret ←
14:51:57 <Zakim> cgueret, you wanted to discuss that data on the web is by definition dynamic
Zakim IRC Bot: cgueret, you wanted to discuss that data on the web is by definition dynamic ←
14:51:57 <Zakim> I see annette_g, hadleybeeman, BernadetteLoscio, laufer on the speaker queue
Zakim IRC Bot: I see annette_g, hadleybeeman, BernadetteLoscio, laufer on the speaker queue ←
14:51:59 <hadleybeeman> ack annette
Hadley Beeman: ack annette ←
14:52:00 <yaso> .. I do think that in the organization we should be based on other that the lyfecycle
.. I do think that in the organization we should be based on other that the lyfecycle ←
14:52:11 <yaso> cgueret: should we take archiving in to account?
Christophe Gueret: should we take archiving in to account? ←
14:52:28 <MTCarrasco> q+
14:52:37 <yaso> hadleybeeman, should we vote it now? Can I make a proposal on this?
hadleybeeman, should we vote it now? Can I make a proposal on this? ←
14:52:42 <annette_g> q+ to say that archiving is a publisher function
Annette Greiner: q+ to say that archiving is a publisher function ←
14:53:02 <hadleybeeman> @yaso, I think we should let the queue run down first.
Hadley Beeman: @yaso, I think we should let the queue run down first. ←
14:53:14 <yaso> @hadleybeeman ok!
@hadleybeeman ok! ←
14:53:17 <hadleybeeman> (since we still have a few more minutes)
Hadley Beeman: (since we still have a few more minutes) ←
14:53:24 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
14:53:37 <cgueret> zakim, mute me
Christophe Gueret: zakim, mute me ←
14:53:37 <Zakim> cgueret should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: cgueret should now be muted ←
14:53:37 <hadleybeeman> ack me
Hadley Beeman: ack me ←
14:53:38 <Zakim> hadleybeeman, you wanted to draw things back to the scope: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Scope
Zakim IRC Bot: hadleybeeman, you wanted to draw things back to the scope: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Scope ←
14:54:33 <yaso> hadleybeeman: we can’t focus in just one group or other
Hadley Beeman: we can’t focus in just one group or other ←
14:54:49 <yaso> hadleybeeman: about data preservation and archiving
Hadley Beeman: about data preservation and archiving ←
14:55:20 <yaso> … it’s important to be aware
… it’s important to be aware ←
14:55:27 <hadleybeeman> ack bern
Hadley Beeman: ack bern ←
14:56:22 <yaso> BernadetteLoscio: I’d like to know if it’s possible to have the FPWD before christmas
Bernadette Farias Loscio: I’d like to know if it’s possible to have the FPWD before christmas ←
14:56:58 <yaso> hadleybeeman: our next call is in january
Hadley Beeman: our next call is in january ←
14:57:04 <ericstephan> @annette perhaps "reuse" as Hadley suggested instead of consumer?
Eric Stephan: @annette perhaps "reuse" as Hadley suggested instead of consumer? ←
14:57:57 <hadleybeeman> @phila, do you want to comment on what needs to be in a FPWD?
Hadley Beeman: @phila, do you want to comment on what needs to be in a FPWD? ←
14:57:57 <yaso> hadleybeeman: its not clear what else is really important to do at the document to have the draft. We are going to work on the document, but we have a lot of questions to answer.
Bernadette Farias Loscio: its not clear what else is really important to do at the document to have the draft. We are going to work on the document, but we have a lot of questions to answer. ←
14:58:13 <hadleybeeman> s/hadleybeeman/bernadetteloscio
14:58:33 <yaso> BernadetteLoscio: can we move on improving the sections that we already have, or should we work on something elsE?
Bernadette Farias Loscio: can we move on improving the sections that we already have, or should we work on something elsE? ←
14:59:12 <yaso> phila: I think that the document is very new, but is evolving fast
Phil Archer: I think that the document is very new, but is evolving fast ←
14:59:22 <MTCarrasco> Phil +1 - probably too early
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: Phil +1 - probably too early ←
14:59:44 <yaso> … it’s possible that we could have a general resolution that over the christmas people want to take a look over it
… it’s possible that we could have a general resolution that over the christmas people want to take a look over it ←
14:59:54 <adler1> +1 phila
Steven Adler: +1 phila ←
15:00:01 <cgueret> +1
Christophe Gueret: +1 ←
15:00:06 <adler1> well said
Steven Adler: well said ←
15:00:09 <gatemezi> +1
Ghislain Atemezing: +1 ←
15:00:12 <AdrianoC> +1
Adriano Pereira: +1 ←
15:00:21 <laufer> +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 ←
15:00:24 <yaso> BernadetteLoscio: so we are going to continue to work at the document, help is welcome, it’s really important that we continue writing
Bernadette Farias Loscio: so we are going to continue to work at the document, help is welcome, it’s really important that we continue writing ←
15:00:26 <annette_g> +1
Annette Greiner: +1 ←
15:00:27 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> +1
Joao Almeida: +1 ←
15:00:28 <ericstephan> +1
Eric Stephan: +1 ←
15:00:38 <yaso> … we can evaluate and vote for this on the next friday
… we can evaluate and vote for this on the next friday ←
15:00:48 <MTCarrasco> Data preservation directly related to web technologies - if we recommend only to archive static data, one has to describe the degration of the dynamic data
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: Data preservation directly related to web technologies - if we recommend only to archive static data, one has to describe the degration of the dynamic data ←
15:01:04 <yaso> phila: I would say that at the moment we don’t have consensus on what the audience is
Phil Archer: I would say that at the moment we don’t have consensus on what the audience is ←
15:01:14 <yaso> … we have annette_g making a strong objection
… we have annette_g making a strong objection ←
15:01:21 <yaso> … so at the moment we don’t have consensus
… so at the moment we don’t have consensus ←
15:01:39 <yaso> +1
+1 ←
15:01:41 <annette_g> I'm happy to continue on email
Annette Greiner: I'm happy to continue on email ←
15:01:50 <BernadetteLoscio> thank you!!!
Bernadette Farias Loscio: thank you!!! ←
15:01:50 <gatemezi> thanks all!
Ghislain Atemezing: thanks all! ←
15:01:51 <yaso> Thank you all!
Thank you all! ←
15:01:55 <ericstephan> thank you!
Eric Stephan: thank you! ←
15:01:56 <cgueret> thx all!
Christophe Gueret: thx all! ←
15:01:57 <laufer> bye all, nice wkd
Carlos Laufer: bye all, nice wkd ←
15:01:57 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> bye
Joao Almeida: bye ←
15:01:58 <CarlosIglesias> bye bye!
Carlos Iglesias: bye bye! ←
15:01:58 <Zakim> -MTCarrasco
Zakim IRC Bot: -MTCarrasco ←
15:01:59 <newton> bye all
Newton Calegari: bye all ←
15:02:00 <cgueret> bye
Christophe Gueret: bye ←
15:02:00 <Zakim> -Steve
Zakim IRC Bot: -Steve ←
15:02:00 <MTCarrasco> bye
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: bye ←
15:02:01 <Zakim> -phila
Zakim IRC Bot: -phila ←
15:02:03 <jerdeb> bye
Jeremy Debattista: bye ←
15:02:03 <Zakim> - +1.510.384.aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: - +1.510.384.aabb ←
15:02:04 <RiccardoAlbertoni> thanks all!
Riccardo Albertoni: thanks all! ←
15:02:04 <BernadetteLoscio> bye bye!!!
Bernadette Farias Loscio: bye bye!!! ←
15:02:05 <Zakim> -cgueret
Zakim IRC Bot: -cgueret ←
15:02:05 <AdrianoC> Bye, see ya!
Adriano Pereira: Bye, see ya! ←
15:02:06 <Zakim> -gatemezi
Zakim IRC Bot: -gatemezi ←
15:02:06 <Zakim> -HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: -HadleyBeeman ←
15:02:07 <Zakim> -CarlosIglesias
Zakim IRC Bot: -CarlosIglesias ←
15:02:07 <Zakim> -laufer
Zakim IRC Bot: -laufer ←
15:02:08 <yaso> Bye!
Bye! ←
15:02:08 <Zakim> -ericstephan
Zakim IRC Bot: -ericstephan ←
15:02:08 <Zakim> -jerdeb
Zakim IRC Bot: -jerdeb ←
15:02:11 <Zakim> -Reinaldo
Zakim IRC Bot: -Reinaldo ←
15:02:15 <Zakim> -AdrianoC
Zakim IRC Bot: -AdrianoC ←
15:02:15 <nathalia> bye
Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício: bye ←
15:02:21 <Zakim> -RiccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: -RiccardoAlbertoni ←
15:02:26 <Zakim> -BernadetteLoscio
Zakim IRC Bot: -BernadetteLoscio ←
15:02:34 <Zakim> -JoaoPauloAlmeida
Zakim IRC Bot: -JoaoPauloAlmeida ←
15:07:34 <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, cgueret, in DATA_DWBP()9:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: disconnecting the lone participant, cgueret, in DATA_DWBP()9:00AM ←
15:07:35 <Zakim> DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended ←
15:07:35 <Zakim> Attendees were phila, MTCarrasco, JoaoPauloAlmeida, +1.509.554.aaaa, ericstephan, cgueret, Reinaldo, Steve, +1.510.384.aabb, laufer, RiccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman,
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were phila, MTCarrasco, JoaoPauloAlmeida, +1.509.554.aaaa, ericstephan, cgueret, Reinaldo, Steve, +1.510.384.aabb, laufer, RiccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, ←
15:07:36 <Zakim> ... AdrianoC, gatemezi, jerdeb, BernadetteLoscio, CarlosIglesias
Zakim IRC Bot: ... AdrianoC, gatemezi, jerdeb, BernadetteLoscio, CarlosIglesias ←
Formatted by CommonScribe