F2F São Paulo - Agenda Proposal DQV
From Data on the Web Best Practices
| Present the current version of the DQV model | http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html |
| Open issues about Quality Annotations and Certificates | |
| ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? | https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/184 |
| ISSUE-185: dqv:QualityAnnotation modeling issues | https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/185 |
| ISSUE-165: What is the relation between duv:Feedback and dqv:UserFeedback? | ( link between DUV and DQV) | http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/165 |
| Open issues about Quality Provenance | |
| ISSUE-181: Should we have only the existing class dqv:QualityMeasureDataset (formerly known as daq:QualityGraph) or keep the new class dqv:QualityMetadata? | https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/181 |
| Open issues about Quality Metrics | |
| ISSUE-187: Do we want to keep the same occurrence constraints as defined in DAQ (for example, that every metric should belong to exactly one dimension)? | https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/187 |
| More general modeling issues, requirements and examples | |
| ISSUE-189: Aether VoID extension uses a different from the pattern that DQV inherits from DAQ | http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/189 |
| ISSUE-190: "official" DQV reqs vs the implementation of our best practices (cf. the "5 stars" thread). | http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/190 |
| ISSUE-164: Are statistics about a dataset a kind of quality info we need to include in the data quality vocabulary? | http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/164 |
| ACTION-153: Look at completeness as one of the quality dimensions | https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/153 |
| ISSUE-188: Section "Express the quality of a linkset" will be completed by examples coming from Riccardo's work on measuring the quality of linksets between SKOS concept schemes | http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/188 |
| Connection with ISO and GEODCAT-DP | https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Aug/0146.html |
| Vocabulary Management and Housekeeping | |
| ISSUE-191: Backward compatibility with DAQ and Data Cube | http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/191 |
| ISSUE-179: The Working Group is considering to put all new classes and properties (together with the ones of the Data Usage Vocabulary) in the DCAT namespace. | http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/179 |
| Discuss how to get feedback from the community | |
| Discuss DQV timetable and next steps | https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_quality_schedule |
| Laufer's question | Raises issue of metadata about different distributions of hte same dataset |
