F2F São Paulo - Agenda Proposal DQV

From Data on the Web Best Practices
Jump to: navigation, search
Present the current version of the DQV model http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html
Open issues about Quality Annotations and Certificates
ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/184
ISSUE-185: dqv:QualityAnnotation modeling issues https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/185
ISSUE-165: What is the relation between duv:Feedback and dqv:UserFeedback? | ( link between DUV and DQV) http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/165
Open issues about Quality Provenance
ISSUE-181: Should we have only the existing class dqv:QualityMeasureDataset (formerly known as daq:QualityGraph) or keep the new class dqv:QualityMetadata? https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/181
Open issues about Quality Metrics
ISSUE-187: Do we want to keep the same occurrence constraints as defined in DAQ (for example, that every metric should belong to exactly one dimension)? https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/187
More general modeling issues, requirements and examples
ISSUE-189: Aether VoID extension uses a different from the pattern that DQV inherits from DAQ http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/189
ISSUE-190: "official" DQV reqs vs the implementation of our best practices (cf. the "5 stars" thread). http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/190
ISSUE-164: Are statistics about a dataset a kind of quality info we need to include in the data quality vocabulary? http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/164
ACTION-153: Look at completeness as one of the quality dimensions https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/153
ISSUE-188: Section "Express the quality of a linkset" will be completed by examples coming from Riccardo's work on measuring the quality of linksets between SKOS concept schemes http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/188
Connection with ISO and GEODCAT-DP https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Aug/0146.html
Vocabulary Management and Housekeeping
ISSUE-191: Backward compatibility with DAQ and Data Cube http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/191
ISSUE-179: The Working Group is considering to put all new classes and properties (together with the ones of the Data Usage Vocabulary) in the DCAT namespace. http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/179
Discuss how to get feedback from the community
Discuss DQV timetable and next steps https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_quality_schedule
Laufer's question Raises issue of metadata about different distributions of hte same dataset